check out this 7777 digit prime I discovered today, it's new to science.
This. Changes. Everything. Do you realize what you have done? The world will never be the same. Be careful anon, you're their target now. Make sure you check if people's eyes reflect lights. If they don't, RUN.
>>17005552I already knew about that one
137 is the 33rd prime number and a bunch of people got obsessed with 137 and the fine structure constant. One of them, Wolfgang Pauli died in room 137
>>17005581OP here, when I was sectioned in the UK, I was put in a room 's136' for three days of solitary confinement. Here's one with 9292 digits.Also, fun fact, these primes are generated by:1. pick an integer as the base: b2. pick an integer: k, where that k<b3. concatenate the digit k in base b, k times to create candidate d4. pick value w, with w<b, where w is coprime to b.5. substitute the first and last digits of d with w6. prime checkingThis procedure produces primes that are palindromic in rather high bases, the first one (7777 digits) is palindromic in base 9719720 with the value k being 1113. Considering there are no palindromic primes in any base with more than two digits which also have an even number of digits, all the primes this method will produce will have an odd number of digits in the base they are formed in, as cannot be prime, palindromic, and have an even number of digits greater than two digits. One fun thing I like is that in any base b, for values of x<b, x*(b-1) will be of the form (x-1):(b-x). Such as in base 10, 7*9 = 63, or (7-1):(10-7), and in base 60, 37*59 = (37-1):(60-37), or 36:23, or 2183. The reason for that is obvious, but I really love it for reckoning.
>>17005587the prime I mentioned of 9292 digits
>>17005587Don’t look into Sacred GeometryYou’re going to anger “them”Remember, as long as you don’t learn sacred truths, you won’t be a threat
>>17005589geaux awne...
What is the smallest prime over 10 000 digits in length?
>>17005581The fine-structure constant is a "pure" number, meaning it is dimensionless and remains the same regardless of the unit system usedThe age of the universe is 13.7 billion years; the fractional difference might be the unraveling starting force.
>>17005631elaborate if you would like please
i only like primes that have a prime number of digits. your primes are both composite and not prime primes. gtfo
>>17005675autism and wrong
>>17005731>9292 is prime>7777 is primeretard
>>17005589Stop vague posting, delve deeper into the golden ratio
>>17005552POLL(a) primes make everything easier(b) primes make everything harder(c) niggers tongue my angles
>>17005552I bet there is also 7777 digit primes in any base you take, from base 2, until base 7777.
>>17005581looks like an horrible case of murder by elites
>>17005674Looking at the differences of >700 million years, it would have to be when life theoretically started on Earth.
>>17006322I'll elaborate. 700 million years ago, Earth was a giant snowball cloaked in ice from pole to pole, for 57 million years.The first animals on Earth were sea sponges and comb jellies. These simple, aquatic creatures first appeared in the ancient oceans roughly 600 to 900 million years ago. While scientific consensus historically pointed to sponges, recent genetic and chromosome studies suggest comb jellies may be the very first branch on the animal tree.