https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513821000453Why is this?They measured intelligence through iq tests btw
Amazing research. This is where your tax dollars are going to.
>>17006470If you're too smart you're not fun
>>17006470"Contraryto our prediction that women would prefer more intelligent men, we found that more intelligent men were rated to have a slightly lower sexual mate appeal(gfactor: b = - .07, 95% HDI [ - .11, - .03]). Men’s physical attractiveness was the main predictor of sexualmate appeal(b= 1.15, 95% HDI [1.05; 1.24]) (see Table 2). These findings do not support our second prediction, suggesting that women did not find intelligent men more appealing."https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/qv3eh_v1
>>17006470timmies be balding af put the cap back on lil timtim leave the "no cap" to men with hair lmao
>>17006470Poos really are genetically inferior specimen.
>>17006470Life is hierarchical.Some guy calls Stacies as Microsoft tech support, while the Stacies hang up and call the other.
>>17006470I'm pretty sure intelligence only makes someone more attractive if they're already attractive.
What are the comorbidities?
>>17006470I noticed dumb bitches get intimidated by intelligence. You gotta hide your power level.
>>17006470Sapiosexual is the word for attraction to intelligent people.
>>17006470>>17006518>another bullshit headline bait "study" by sociologists that's really just a polltl;dr (Supplement pages 13-15)- If women think you're smart then they're statistically more likely to fuck you- If you're actually smart then women aren't statistically more likely to fuck you- Women are statistically good at telling if you're smart or notSeems self-contradictory? Shut up science denier!
>>17006470I talked to a female physicist about it, and she said being around guys is all the same. I guess they pick who they get along with the easiest, which would double for child relations.
>>17006729This can be explained by rare smart Chads and common smart men like me that women don't even see until it's too late. They notice the IQ in Chads that read a book in a café but they don't notice most smart men at all, so most smart men are actually virgins whereas 100 IQ normie bullies at least are given sex a few times.
>>17006712Yeah just like men are intimidated by career women, right?
Physical attractiveness is a letter of recommendation to open the envelope and see the intelligence. That's how I enjoy women.
>>17006470>life is hierarchical, one guy works at his dad's hedge fund while the other delivers Uber eats
>>17006735that's a very nuanced and highly sophisticated position, Eugenics Master 666, thank you for sharing
Man that's crazy. I've always been socially retarded (literal definition of the word), no fun, and obviously too smart for my own good.And I've tuened down (or ignored rather) as many females as I've taken, both numbers being higher than the claimed male average lifetime partner count.But then I'm decent looking, always have a muscular appearance, and my flaccid dick is bigger than at least 33% of erect men if the statistics are anywhere close to true.
>>17006590Lmfao
>>17006876If you're socially retarded and looking up dick statistics on the internet then I promise that none of the girls you "ignored" were ever actually trying to hit on you.
>>17006470Well being intelligent or well educated isn't exactly fun either. You basically have to nod and feign agreement for most of your life because the alternative is basically arguing with people who refuse to know any better or find any sign of knowledge and wisdom an affront to their being. It's not a smart/dumb people thing, there are people who will put you on their shitlist solely because of your apparent or actual knowledge and expertise. More so if you don't fit their definition of a person who should be knowledgeable or intelligent.All those issues pile up and you basically have a handicap that makes getting someone to want know more about you even harder unless you have the looks to offset it (to a degree) or real wealth.
>>17006803is this foid being cereal kek
>>17007478fag
>>17007478Kek
>>17006470>he is a genetic dead end midget poocel with tiny 1 inch pecker, that means he must be a quant super genius or some shit at leastNormnigger copes at its finest.
>>17007661True."The project, documented across five volumes published between 1925 and 1959, demonstrated that high childhood intelligence robustly predicts superior educational attainment, professional success, physical health, and social adjustment in adulthood, with subjects outperforming general population norms on multiple metrics despite comprising only a small fraction of true historical geniuses.[3][4]"https://grokipedia.com/page/Genetic_Studies_of_Genius"This Vanderbilt-led initiative builds on 2023 midlife data showing no well-being deficits relative to norms, including robust physical and mental health profiles among the gifted."https://grokipedia.com/page/Study_of_Mathematically_Precocious_Youth
I find it funny how Indians try to cope with muh google or intelligence. But Europeans are way more intelligent on average than Indians too, and produce far more research/innovation.
>>17006842This is more likely.
>>17007758>IndiansWhich ones?>EuropeansWhich ones?
>>17007689Most genius level people aren't actually known or public about ir.
>>17007811Zainichi indians saar
>works at Google>is responsible for turning a universally beloved technological giant into a flaming trashbin, or at best, throwing kerosine and tires on top of said firevs.>serves drinks>makes people happyHierarchical indeed.
>>17008078this is the biggest cope ive seen by the saar race. you guys are dysgenic as shit, look at that jeets head its small as fuck hes def not working for google you retarded bitch ass nigger
>>17008078that jeet probably has a disgusting 2 incher thats black and nasty with a filthy bush
>>17007813>Most genius level people aren't actually known or public about ir.I have no clue what you mean by "genius level," but precocious youth who go on to become some of the best in their respective fields are generally well known.
>>17006470Statistically speaking left is probably smarter
Intelligence likely isn't directly attractive, being strong also isn't directly attractive, being tall also isn't directly attractive.attraction is based on what these traits can produce and how you use them
>>17006712this is only because they believe the most inane shitwhen they encounter someone thinking rationally, it challenges their skewed worldview on a mode they can't argument with nor refutethe uneasiness triggers a feeling of alienation that in turn fuels anxietyand since they usually lack introspection, they project the negative emotions onto the nature of the encounter>>17006729>Women are statistically good at telling if you're smart or notsee abovethey only think you're smart if you confirm their biasesmind you, men are as dumb, just in different ways
>science article>main author : psychology majorlol yeah right most bullshit article ever plus most cuck subject for an article everplus theyre using references from 1998 lmao
>>17008210You're being ridiculous. There's absolutely no reason why psychology can't be subjected to empirical analysis. It already is.
>>17008210>hasn't read the g-factorKek.
>>17008096You have, perhaps, missed the point for the sake of being angry at jeets.
>>17008209>they only think you're smart if you confirm their biasesIt's called "stereotype accuracy."https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/beaq3_v1https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391329394_Stereotypes_of_the_Intelligence_of_Nations
>>17008211because it's a field built on sand, you'd need to root and branch the entire field. at least psychoterics has something measurable.
>>17008213Many people seem to be that way, i wonder if they're rash, npcs or just bots?
>>17008228>psychotericsDo you mean psychometrics? What do you think that's a subfield of?
>>17006518>Contrary to our prediction that women would prefer more intelligent menHow deeply brainwashed by feminism do you have to be to make that prediction? Who ever actually believed women who said "I just want a nice guy who is smart and funny"? Women don't give a shit about any of that, they want a dominant, cool man who fucks her rough.>Some of the authors of the study are womenKek, I wonder if they pretended to be surprised by this. >>17006585No, it still makes them less attractive. Take two guys of equal attractiveness and women will reject a genius nice guy in favor of a midwit asshole. This used to be widely known by all men, but somehow feminists shamed men into pretending otherwise
>>17006489If you're smart enough to be witty and clever then that's attractive, that's basically the extent of the attraction to intelligence
>>17008278Typo yes, I'm aware its a sub field but it's the only properly replicable part of it. some absolute howlers have emerged from the field, one of which was some study of polynesians written entirely from a hotel room
>>17008289there's more if you can use your smarts to stay fit, get rich and wield power
>>17008299That's true
