Is human sexual dimorphis the result of misogynistic patriarchial selective breeding?
>>17009723
actually if we are talking about northern european blonde selection it is the opposite. Due to larger female population (males dying from hunting big animals), male started to select for rare traits like blonde hair and blue eyes because of their inherent rarity, thus creating the condition for their expression in northern european population, it's not ideological, just sure economics
>>17009723See Mao! Those hotblooded highschoolers are as calm as tigers that took a spin in a microwave dish! I set mine to popcorn!Why would you believe in such a girl? POLNAREFF!? I SET MINE TO PEANUTBUTTER!!!>>17009759
>>17009723Yes. Women could be bigger on average than Men if we picked things differently
>>17009723In the future women will be big and men will be (very) small.
>>17009723*white* misogynistic patriarchal selective breeding, yes. along with capitalism
>>17009723It can't be an all, and there is not nearly enough time with the characteristics from outside ourselves.
>>17009723Probably not. Asians have the most patriarchal and misogynistic culture on the planet, literally murdering female infants, and they have no sexual dimorphism.