What do scientists mean by "subatomic particles have no location?" How does an electron have NO location? I don't get it at all lol.
>>17012378it means they cant find where they are but they know they are there somehow
>>17012378There is no theoretical location for a subatomic particle outside of the measurement.
>>17012378I wouldn't worry about it, just take your gene altering vaccine and pay your carbon taxes.
>>17012420When your people are shit, but you still give it you all anyway? Will you get all moany about this truth?
I don't think so.You deserve the worst luck.
>>17012378because they are not really "particles" in the common sense of the word
>>17012442But I'll give it my all anyway, and do everything I can to first help you, and anything else I can do. That's asking a lot, someone who's faithful to good.
>>17012443Shut up for a sec and focus on your problem.
Honestly, not really. You're not a good people to be with. But you got everything I can do. Hopefully I can help(not happy about it).
>>17012420IT CHANGES LIKE GENES AND SHITMIGA TRUST THE PLAN
Everyone deserves the best luck
>>17012456Awww.Well not with me.
>>17012378You know how Jesus is Lord, and he is God, but also God is God and the holy ghost is also God?And how jesus is also the bread and wine you have at church? Its like that, the electron is in multiple places at the same time, until you try to find it, then its only in one place. It sounds dumb but when you shoot lasers at molecules you can literally observe it happening, you aim for one part of the molecule where you think there should be an electron and you hit it exactly as many times as the math says you should
Subatomic partical here, amaI only have time to answer one, though
>>17012455Trump created the poisonous gene altering vaccine by the way, libshits and MIGAmorons are equally cattle.Cue the schizophrenic mental gymnastics.
So one electron has more than one location? Lol.
>>17012488The electron includes a probability distribution for its measured position.
>>17012493Yeah ok, but how is that possible.What does this mean.How can it have a probability of a position and not a position. Lol.
>Electrons have no location>Also, they're right here
>>17012570Science really seems so schizophrenic when you think about it.>Le world is 13,700,000,000 years old>Le life just happened because it just le did>Le spooki electron has no real location, just a probability of location that changes if you measure it or measure its momentumLol.
>>17012488Lets say there's a molecule with an orbital that has space for 2 electrons, but it has only one electron. There's a probability of finding it at one of two places, but if we shoot beams at each place, we get that exact probability, even if we shoot two beams at the same timeeach time beam 1 hits an electron, beam 2 misses one, and each time beam 2 hits, beam 1 misses. This is the experimental result from real life and the only way it make sense (other than the electron being physically huge or zipping around faster than the speed of light) is that it *behaves as if its 2 places at once* when hit by lightBut if you poke it with a probe designed to capture a single electron, you'll only find one electron in one place
what
>>17012596Your explanation makes sense but the natural phenomenon still doesn't make sense.But I've heard that quantum randomness is "truly" random which makes even less sense too, because I thought every effect has a cause.Is this probability of location also truly random, how is that possible. If that's true doesn't it mean like basically everything is just "le random.">>17012597Read this until you understand it: >>17012596Lol.
>>17012420>gene alteringit still doesn't do that, sorry sweetie>inb4 seething
>>17012378It means that shitentists make up so much lies and garbage to cover up for their other lies that everything becomes absurd and contradictory
>>17012378They mean that determinism itself is emergent and not resultant
>>17012378They only exist when there's a weight on its position and the nucleus. Other wise it's like superfluid that can make shapes and tiny specks.
>>17012495It's present everywhere around the nucleus until you try to locate it. If it's not being measured, the electron is a field and you calculate its probable location so you know where to aim the microscope
>>17012378soientists make up so much garbage it's impressive
>>17012686RNA is a form of genetic code, just not a very stable one. Technically it is gene altering, sweetie.>>17012603The probability distribution isn’t random. It’s stochastic. You’re much more likely to find an electron near the nucleus of an atom. If there are other electrons, then the probability distribution shifts the possible locations for the electrons, but they’re still following the laws of electromagnetism.It’s not “random” like “omg what if the electron was on Alpha Centauri XD so randumb”In fact, when Bohr calculated where the electron “orbits” a hydrogen nucleus using his outdated model that didn’t rely on probability distributions — it lined up exactly with the peak of a radial probability distribution from modern quantum mechanics.Electrons want to be close to the nucleus and far away from other electrons. Stochastic or deterministic, either way it’s a balancing act. Not random.
Should be a way to build a quantum computer at room temp with a stable atom if we can interact with the nucleus of a group..
>>17015874Isolate them with entropy so there's no decoherance.
>>17015869Bohr crowning achievement of instrumentalist interpretation was a false model of the atom. The guy was a fucking retard who thought he knew QM better than Planck and Maxwell.
>>17012378They should say they have no classical location. They do have a location described by a wave function.
