you know, 4 years ago it was uncommon for a /sci/ thread to stay up longer than a day and a half. we now have like 5 over 30 days old. As far as I can tell the site traffic hasn't declined that much, what the fuck is going on here? My home board switched to /his/ and /lit/ a while back, so I haven't been reading these threads. Do we still have tooker and weebs in /mg/ /sqt/?
>>17013819Just use a theme that's forbidden in this CIA chatroom. Get's way more faster to the archive. Or better one where the author is blocked and you will permabanned to link to. If you think this site is about science, just start one of them and a flaterath one as "control group"
>>17013819There's a bump bot, it's been here for like couple of years at least. Dozens of threads are being bumped on schedule with inane garbage.
