You can't project a flat earth onto a sphere without getting insane amounts of distortion.
>>17014398You could have googled "how does google maps avoid distorted flat projections." and had your answer.
>>17014406He's attention whoring. He's posted similar threads of other boards like /tv/ trying to rile people up.
>>17014398/x/ is smarter than /sci/
>>17014398>distortiondistorted to what mate??? Are we supposed to automatically know what youre talking about when you say "distorted to"? Do you expect everyone to have mind reading abilities for you??all maps of the earth are approximations by the literal fucking definition you assclown. 100% of all maps have some degree of distortion. what did you do asshole? Did you personally verify every single distance by every cartographer and surveryor of the past 2000 years, and match them up with every known map ever made? you went through a million maps and decide which ones were "distorted" and "not distorted"?
>>17014398Are you enjoying being an attention whore?
If it is flat, and all the other aren't then that is wild. But just be safe in the knowledge the the government is lying about far greater things than the world being flat. Why would we recruit in stem so heavily if the world was secretly flat and we had been doing the wrong calculations for years?
