What are things everybody consider to be science that are not actually science?
>>17016461Science
>>170164612d to 3d rendering. Technical illustrators and modelers think they are big shit, but still cannot, in 2026, project a simple 3d object, like a girl's dress, on a flat plane and make it match. The palm tree branch is supposed to continue on the other side of the seam, but it doesn't. Why, retards?
>>17016461Meteorology
>>17016461Mathematics
>>17017000>not science yet more reproducible than all of scienceHow do math chads do it?
>>17016461Scientology
>>17016922Hybrid Theory
/x/
>>17016472what kind of b8 is this?
>>17016461Psychology. The methodology simply does not meet the rigor of the scientific method. I don't blame them, as there's no sufficent understanding of the mind nor the tech necessary to study it scientifically, but they should admit it's protoscientific at best, much like natural philosophy used to be.