imagine this situation: I extract my own blood, extract the DNA, put it in a gamete but with the male gene changed into a female gene, implant the gamete in my gf's uterus, it grows and after 9 months she gives birth, wait 18 years until she's of age, then have sex with her and impregnate her.what will the baby be like? will it be a clone genetically identical to the both of us or will there be differences?will it be inbred or will it avoid that because since we're the same and not just alike it's just a clone?hypothetically speaking of course
>>17016747Cool it with the antisemitism Laban
>gene changedNo – it won't be a clone genetically.
>>17016747I only understand genetics to the degree I was taught in middle school but the chance that the progeny would be a genetic clone to either of you would be (0.5)^22, or 2^-22, provided each pairing of alleles is unique, right?The genes that make up (You) come in pairs and so for someone to be a clone, they have to get the first allele from parent A or B and then get exactly the other allele from the other parent.
>>17017085yeah, but both parent A and B have the same genes, so the probability is 100%
>>17017101No it's not 100%?Say you have a pairing of alleles ABThe possible resultant pairings from two parents having the same A&B alleles are AA, BB and AB with 25%, 25% and 50% probabilities. As you can see, a progeny having AA and BB would not be a genetic clone of the parents.
Having a baby with a mix of yourself and your wife wouldn't be a clone and would have the same differences.
Won't the baby die (cuz same genes so yk lethal mutations might happen due to meiosis or smth?) (I am a Math guy not Bio)
>>17017114>>17017152bro, if she has the allele A and I have the allele B, then the probability of AB is 100%.AA and BB can only happen when you're similar but different, because she is 100% assured to have A and I'm 100% assured to have B>>17017139wife just carries the baby to term
>>17017165Bait or retardation, call it.
