Is it possible to use LLMs effectively to learn science? Any guides?
>>17016750Why don't you ask your ai friend to write you a guide?
>>17016758I don't trust it
>>17016763The DSM-V would say that's because you are not a trustworthy person, so you project mistrust onto others
>>17016750Learn? Maybe.Effectively? No.
You can learn by studying moral toplogy and exegesizing your bible
>>17016750An LLM has zero consciousness, so no. But an LLM cannot be considered apart from the user.Is it possible for you to learn science from an LLM? Not by itself, there's no substitute for reading the source material from which LLMs regurgitate. LLMs can be used to assist understanding but they often make errors so they should not be relied upon too heavily.There's also no substitute for laboratory and/or field experience. Thankfully this can be engaged with in an amateur capacity in many cases.
>>17016750Use it to summarise blocks of text and make cloze for SRS study.Anything beyond this is asking for failure.
