Time seems to be more resilient than a simple line or point. A point in time is really contention between a vessel and it's mirror. Time, as 4D, seems to be composed of multiple dimensions, including rate, set, and harm. There's more to time than rate and length as measured by the clock. Time has it's own resilience, it is broken down by humans. What do you think?
>>17019897Nope, everything is as they say rock slurrys spontaneously self organize against the entropic gradient.(+Time)------\|/—-(+i*Time)----------Temporality------(-Time)—---/|\----(-i*Time)(+Distance)------\|/—-(+i*Distance)---------------Spatiality-------------(-Distance)—---/|\----(-i*Distance)(-i*Time)------\|/—-(+i*Time)----------Wick Rotation----(-i*Distance)—---/|\----(+i*Distance)(Electron)-------\/—--(Photon)—-------------Quanta—---------(Graviton)------/\-----(Phonon)(GaussE)-------\/—--(Ampere)—---------------E/M—---------(GaussM)------/\-----(Faraday)>She blinded me with science
>>17019897Scientists now mostly agree that time is 3 dimensional, with two dimensions unbounded and a third dimension curled up
>>17020055Bivalent temporality and spatiality violates feynmann Stuckleberg
