Is mathematics the most successful collaborative, open-source project in history?
No, capitalism and money is, math is a close second.
it used to be until schizos took over. and no, i don't mean people like tooker. i mean people like terrence tao. euler was one of the last real mathematicians
>>17022073Do money without numbers
>>17022074Tao has done virtually nothing to revolutionize or schizofy math worse than it already was
>>17022075if you can count to 10 you can engage in commerce, you need virtually no math, you can even trade with barter if you want to.
>>17022076>being part of the problem absolves him of his responsibility because he didn't make it worse
>>17021726All us share a common language- the language of rhythm, which is energy, frequency and vibration. So yes math is>>17022073Money isnt collaborative, if it was you wouldnt need the violence monopoly to enforce legal tender laws and make a p2p ecash system a capital gains event. Its also not open source, if it were the majority would understand the system, and there would be a revolution tomorrow morning. Its a competitive closed source system
>>17021726science as a whole is. or rather used to be, until academia went from a prestige and technology development thing to money and fame.
>>17021726>Is mathematics the most successful collaborative, open-source project in history?Before arxiv, Alexandra Elbakyan and Zentralblatt Open it wasn't
>>17022073capitalism is entirely based on fucking over people who are at an informational disadvantage
>>17022073>capitalism>collaborativecapitalism is about getting to the top and staying at the top
>>17022202>>17024790>>17025250Collaboration != Cooperation. Trade is inherently collaborative, because it has multiple entities working with the same goal in mind (getting richer)Money is by no means more successful than math tho, no idea what that anon is smoking
