Falsifiability does not tell us whether a claim is true or false; it tells us whether the claim is testable in a way that allows evidence to potentially refute it.Science cannot tell you truth.This is OBVIOUS.
>>17023252It can tell you what is true enough in every way that actually matters.
>>17023253This must explain why every ~10 years most scientific discoveries change, right Einstein?
>>17023252Science doesn't tell you anything.Science is a methodology you can use to model and predict observable events
>>17023252Following your brainlet logic to its ultimate conclusion, nothing can actually tell you "truth", so what's your point?
>>17023260>Science doesn't tell you anything.>Science is a methodology>A methodology doesn't tell you anything
Why is he so fat?
>>17023252>Science cannot tell you truthAll this does is send us down a philosophical rabbit hole of defining truth. How can you know that literally anything is true?
>>17023255>every ~10 years most scientific discoveries changeThis assertion is false.
>>17023252Fun fact, the isotropy of the one way speed of light is untestable. It's a definition by Einstein,and a retarded one since it killed simultanety and needed a "bending space" which is philosophical bullshit. Lorentzian aether, even if not without doubt detectable. gives the better definition.
>>17025678>the isotropy of the one way speed of light is untestableIt's a postulate. Of course you can't test it.
>>17023260"methodology" to "predict observable events" would be an induction, and the "events" require man-made manipulation of the effects"model" needs to be a natural experiment model or it has nothing to do with science at allIts like people are forgetting here: there would be no point in inductive hypothesis nor inductive theory without deductive hypothesis
>>17025817Yesi just wanted to mention it because in mainstream you often hear "Einstein proved that light propagates with c in every direction".
