If Lisa Randall and Raman Sundrum are correct, and gravity has a bulk mediated component then the following question must be addressed. If our brane is a boundary condition embedded in a bulk that we can't directly perceive except through gravity leaking across dimensions, it then flows that if consciousness or causality also turned out to have any bulk mediated component, wouldn't that make phenomena we currently call 'supernatural' just poorly instrumented physics rather than something outside physics at all? Where exactly do we draw the line, and is it a principled line or a sociological one?
I already know what Lisa would say. She would say some shit like>b-but gravity it's just geometry!!Sorry Lisa, but that does not side step the question. Your mathematics explicity leaves the door open for supernatural phenomenon. You know this, and it is why you have been so against the literal interpretation of your work. This doesn't mean god vs spooky science it is a new domain that your work suggests is based in geometry.
After hearing my questions. She would immediately request a sit down dinner with myself. And I being the gentlemen I am would accept her request for a formal date. Her being old enough to be my mother matters not.
>>17026187I would have dinner as well. It would be like emergent properties of gravity don't directly have causality on dreams. That part is in freefall because it predates the universes creation. Bla bla sorry it would be a huge conversation.
Interesting...
>>17026580Read the emails. She's so spergy it's cute. I dont think she has many friends.
>>17026778don't try to down play this, hymie, so was associating with a known pedophile, human trafficker, blackmailer, and mossad operative
