/sci/entifically speaking what happens after death? And would I be "safe" after death? No quantum immortality, right, /sci/?
>>17027037From your perspective, you go back to your birth/beginning.Death doesnt exist to a conscious observer, its unbroken
You get stuck to your body without any senses for all eternity.
>>17027077without a sense for time?
>>17027161Time slows down 100 times.
look up frozen block universe theory bro, you're already dead. the "present moment" is an illusion created by your brain.i can't give a clean answer as to what happens to the first-person observer after death. all i can say confidently is that frozen block universe is the cleanest interpretation of special relativity, einstein probably believed in it (in one of his letters, he said the flow of time was an illusion) and according to this interpretation, the present doesn't exist, the past and future are only distinguishable because of increasing information/entropy, and every moment of your life exists eternally inside of a 4-dimensional block universe. you're already dead, and your brain is just lagging behind because of the way it records information.
>>17027174That's all fine but the reality is a Lorentzian aether not SR. Einstein knew about it and thought of postulates to replicate it, that's how SR was created.
>>17027162only 100 times?
>>17027077The soul is trapped scientifically speaking? What happens if the body decays does the soul ghost escape to outer space?
>>17027037If causality exists then the universe must be caused by a cause outside of causality. Think about it
>>17027207You get stuck to the ground.
>>17027174Conscious perception is comprised of two fundamental modes: sense-experience of the present moment, and narrative experience of a duration. I say "narrative experience" because to imagine in terms of duration is to imagine a narrative arc comprised of change over time.That this isn't an artifact but in fact structural to the nature of change itself is provided by the fundamental theorem of calculus, which describes integration and differentiation as inverse operations. Experience of the present moment is differential; duration is integral.Relativity formalizes this. Proper time is literally a line integral: τ = ∫ds along a worldline. Duration, in relativity, has no existence except as an integral over a path through spacetime.Differential structure is the tangent vector, the four-velocity dx/dτ, and the local light cone at an event. It is exactly the "present moment;" local, frame-dependent in its simultaneity judgments, but invariantly there as a point on the worldline.What relativity destroys is not the present but the global present: the idea of a universe-wide "now." The Rietdijk–Putnam argument uses relativity of simultaneity to kill presentism precisely because presentism needs the now to be global. The calculus-based model I presented does not suggest or require a global now.This most closely corresponds to the growing block or evolving universe models - the past is the completed integral, the present is the moving upper bound of integration where dτ is being added, and the future doesn't exist because it hasn't been integrated yet.
>>17027037>what happens after death?who's death?
>>17027037you descend to the únterrealm and must battle the mantis king to obtain safe passage to the next plane
>>17027077Explain how you experience this.
>>17027037There isn't a scientific answer on this. Even people that experienced clinical death don't really have a concise answer. My opinion is probably some sort of reincarnation, because of the infinite box thought experiment. So we could be reborn but not right after our current lives, if that makes sense.
>>17028097the NDE stuff seems to be more popular than before now, I think its "in" the youtube algos more heavilyI believe they are having some kind of experience but most of it must be clickbait at this point>die>supposedly form memories in your brain while dead>come back with the ability to recall the memories
>>17028090By being stuck inside of a block universe for all eternity.
>>17029138If it’s possible to experience something without recording it to memory, then that opens up a whole new can of worms. I could be consciously experiencing what it’s like to be (You) right now, and I’m just not remembering it.
>>17027037the dead have never spilled their secrets anon
>>17027037God's judgement. Morality is objective, not subjective.
>>17027037It’s like being an unborn child I’ve experienced it
