why cant science figure out where grabbidy comes from
Well it's mediated by waves because we learned that back in 2015 and most likely a quantum particle but we aren't sure on that second part yet. IIRC if we find a massless spin 2 Boson it basically has to be the graviton. Also the problems with detecting gravity at a quantum scale is like 30 orders of magnitude harder or some shit than say, the photon.But I'm not a particle physicist.
>>17027455Science cannot figure out where anything comes from, it can only describe what is.
>>17027584>>17027500so its so small you cant see it but its everywherehow does that make any sense
>>17027500Just like the photon's path integral is solved by wick rotating gauss E t->-it and ampere by t->itThe gravitons temporal integral is solved by wick rotating spatiality by x->ix on faradays equation and x->-ix on gauss mStop being a bivalent feynmann stuckelrberg retard
>>17027738Are you dumb? CO2 exists yet we can't see it. Is this a troll?
>>17027794(+Time)------\|/—-(+i*Time)----------Temporality------(-i*Time)—---/|\----(-Time)(+Distance)------\|/—-(-i*Distance)---------------Spatiality-------------(+IDistance)—---/|\----(-Distance)(+Distance*+Time)------\|/—-(-iDistance*+i*Time)------------------------Spatio-Temporality------(+I*Distance*-i*Time)—---/|\----(-Distance*-Time)(-i*Time)------\|/—-(+i*Time)----------Wick Rotation----(-i*Distance)—---/|\----(+i*Distance)(Electron)-------\/—--(Photon)—-------------Quanta—---------(Graviton)------/\-----(Phonon)(GaussE)-------\/—--(Ampere)—---------------E/M—---------(GaussM)------/\-----(Faraday)(+/-½ spin)-------\/—--(1-spin)—--------Quanta Spin—---------(2-spin)------/\-----(+/-i2/1 spin)(Cytosine)-------\/—--(Adenine)—--------------DNA—---------(Thymine)------/\-----(Guanine)
>>17027807(+/-½ spin)-------\/—--(+/-1-spin)—--------Quanta Spin—---------(+/-i2-spin)------/\-----(+/-i2/1 spin)Is probably more explanatory if you wanna get technical
>>17027810Based science corrector
(+/-½ spin) -------\/—-- (+/-i1-spin)------------ Quanta Spin ------------(+/-i2-spin) ------/\---- (+/-2/1 spin)Final answer, the imaginary temporal and real spatial chirality of the photonThe imaginary spatial and real temporal chirality of the gravitonPhonon is real vibration in the mass, seethecope virtual particlist typifiers
https://github.com/syzygial-engineer/ASToE/blob/main/astoe_node_network/core/works%20in%20progress/ASToE.md
>>17027803you can see co2 with a microscope
>>17027891Still not an argument. We know quarks exist but we can't see them. Like I said, the graviton is theorized.
>>17027895quarks have been indirectly observed though gravitons never have
>>17027455How about you grabbideez nuts Jenny
>>17027500Why can't someone just dig really far down and find these "gravitons"?
>>17027899Which is why I stated the graviton is theorized.
>>17027910They don't exist, neither does dark matter or dark energy, but reality is too weird for us to figure out right now and way too weird for retards on 4chan so we just have these magic fairy dust placeholders.
>>17027910they are spatially imaginary so they cannot be seen in spatial dimensionsjust like a photon cannot be frozen in time, because it has imaginary temporal dimensionalityThe word "IMAGINARY" does not mean; Made Up, it means Sqrt of -1 which is an internal curvature metric on the complex unit circle.Our observatory window; as massive beings is phase locked to Real Time and Real Distance only; so you cannot "See" something that has imaginary spatial dimensions, you can just feel its real-temporal and spatially curving effect(gravity). I dont know how many times you have to be told the same thing while you act deliberately obtuse.
>>17027916You're onto something, or I have the same type of crazy. We should collaborate.
nobody in here has still explained how gravy works
it's coming from over there *points down*
>>17027910the deeper you want to look the more energy you need, at least with atom smashers. Maybe if someone figures out a way to observe atoms and subatomic particles that doesn't require brute force violence this won't be an issue anymore.>And if gravity isn't a particle at allThen we rethink how gravity interacts with or is manifested by the other physical forces we can observe., at different physical scales.
>>17029051Gravy is a liquid bread. Get some continental grain powder, like flour or bisquick or rye shavings. Also get some skim milk and butter. Cook a dead animal and whisk the powder into the hot blood that boils out. Add milk if it's too thick; add butter if it's too thin.
>>17029070gross no>>17029068that makes nonsense >>17029065shut up this is serious
>>17029073omg the cat is your friend, not the gravy source, asshole.
>>17029073>shut up this is seriousI'm technically right though
>>17029073>that makes nonsense>the deeper you want to look the more energy you need, at least with atom smashers. The reason for this is because atom smashers allow us to see inside atoms by smashing them together and breaking them apart. It's an extremely brutish method that requires energy, obscene amounts of it. You might think there's a point at which it could be considered excessive but we could literally require the power of a quasar just to power an atom smasher that could let us see maybe a quarter of the way to the scale of the planck length. Eventually we're going to need a better method.
>>17029091Actually, the real wall would be trying to concentrate too much energy into a single point and creating a black hole. Either way we need to think of something else eventually.
>>17027455If you move a thing in a vacuum, you have to move the vacuum too. Because the vacuum isn't infinite. Likewise if you stretch a t shirt, you haven't made it bigger. Ergo gravity
>>17029750can you explain that smaller i dont get it
>>17029758Everything in the universe isn't really a 'thing' but a massive shitstorm of whirlpools which only looks like discrete things to us because of our puny lifetime and stereoscopic vision. That is gravity.
>>17027916How convenient. "We don't have to prove this fairy exists through observation, because it has magical unobservable paint. How do we know that exists? Well, you can't see the fairy, right?"
>>17027584can /sci/entists here describe what a woman is?
>>17029836so basically the universe is a toilet gravity is the water and all the stuff floating around are the turds
>>17029847Exactly what kind of homosexual are you?
Traveling in a spaceship, you would need shielding from the influx of quantum particles building up forces near objects.
>>17029908It's not shielding, because you can't move a force. But you could miss them.
>>17029876Yes, proof of this is a black hole (or anything with a lot of gravity). How can something so small, such as a singularity or a planetary core, have so much pull? It becomes easily explained if you accept it isn't actually small, it only looks small on x,y,z axes.Along the axis of gravity, a black hole would look like a very, very long pit.
