Why did (male) scientists come up with the theory that women care more about intelligence and money rather than looks, while freely admitting that looks matter the most in women?I've seen multiples studies refuting that looks in men arent the most important (as if they were necessary), and they always say that they're surprised and that "more research is needed" and "the relationships are more complex than previously thought"What's the science behind this?
>>17028687You need a model that is a hybrid between hereditarian and sociological to accurately explain human behavior. Unfortunately we are stuck in a paradigm where you're supposed to pick your team and stick with it. So you end up with retardedness like "women are primed to pick Chad and men are primed to pick Stacy", and the like, when that clearly isnt the whole story...
>>17028687It's possible that whoever is getting the most votes at your church or whorehouse or whatever is more important than something like natural selection in those places
>>17028687When science was taken over by ugly, stupid men.
>>17028687irrelevant pointless research that has no real world effects whatsoever so who cares. nothing wrong with caring more about appearance anyways, and every demographic group ever does it
>>17028721>irrelevant pointless research that has no real world effects whatsoeverSo 99% of research nowadays?
>>17028772also 99% of posts on the internet
>>17028687Studies on attraction are fucking retarded like >we surveyed women and actually they like humor and intelligence and don't care about looksOk nigger yeah then explain why they literally filter every male under 6'2" on dating apps. Explain why all the hot girls from highschool marry chads without any real skew towards higher income brackets. Women just don't want to admit to anyone, including themselves, that they only care about looks and height. Like the notion that they would take some 5'6" jester nice guy with a stable career over a chad that fucks them like an animal is just the height of beta cope.
>>17028687Its a psyop from the government to make men work more.
>>17028719So always? Post Newton?
>>17028811>why all the hot girls from highschool marry chadsWhy do all the chads mary hot girls? I mean it's like I was in a coma for 30 years and woke up in a bizarro world where young people were CHOCKED that attractive people are, in fact, attractive
>>17028840
>>17028687You mean the same group of cowards that gave nukes over to psychopathic governments? They have been zogged form birth.
>>17028903Check the ethnicity of the people doing that and you will be shocked.Now check who was the inventor for the hyydrogen bomb in the usa, and who in the sovjet union.Now check who the leading scientist behind the first modern mass producted gas war was, he had to even convince the german government back then that they should use it.What would be the odds they all have something in common?
>>17028721>irrelevant pointless research that has no real world effectsit refutes foids gaslighting (it's not your face it's your personality, men are shallow women don't care about your looks, ugly women have it bad too, etc)it provides empirical support for disability gibs for ugly menit incentivises men to work towards building better women (robot girlfriends)
>>17028811>Women just don't want to admit to anyone, including themselves, that they only care about looks and heighti know right?it would close the simp and orbiter's money faucetit would make them feel like shitty human beingsit would make men avoid women and start working towards robot women
>>17028811A small fraction of women are on dating appsA small fraction of women are american Your experience is very limited
>>17029299fuck off
>>17029297Unlovable
>>17029324a child molester is loveable by foids if he's a chad thundercock https://incels.wiki/w/Atomic_Blackpill#/media/File%3A0k673zysixq01.jpg>>17029317women are the same shit everywhere they have the ability to choose chad thundercock
>>17028687Intelligence and wealth provide security.Seking security is deeply ingrained in the female psyche.
>>17029368>Intelligence and wealth provide security.>Seking security is deeply ingrained in the female psyche.women think height provides security, not your intelligence
>>17029379Then it's a good thing I'm 6'5", in addition to being well-off and intelligent, I guess.But I never found that was the case for me.
>>17029326>a child molester is loveable by foids if he's a chad thundercock>https://incels.wiki/w/Atomic_Blackpill#/media/File%3A0k673zysixq01.jpgThat's must be true I can see it from the pixels. He didnt change his bio after receiving those responses, noooo, who would do that
>>17029518>He didnt change his bio after receiving those responses, noooo, who would do thathere's a live on thenhttps://youtu.be/Ks_dZgzwDg4or this onehttps://crimeviral.com/2020/11/hybristophilia-why-so-many-women-fell-in-love-with-richard-ramirez/but sure bro it's personality, nothing to do with your maxila and jawline
>>17028687>Why did (male) scientists come up with the theory that women care more about intelligence and >money rather than looks, while freely admitting that looks matter the most in women?>What's the science behind this?Women’s control over men involves instilling in men the idea that, in order to have sex, they must do what benefits women and that this is what makes them “good men.” When a woman has a problem with a man she desires sexually, she can go cry to the “good men” and play the victim.Those male scientists were raised by their mothers and other female figures to learn how to attract women for the benefit of the women themselves.The truth is very simple, but it’s strongly opposed by all women because it takes away their power.Ugly men will talk about love as something complex. Handsome men see everything as being about sex or attraction. There’s a world of difference between how a handsome man and an ugly man experience romantic life. And women know what kind of man you are just by looking at you for a millisecond.Just think about it: all those women who ask men for money, time, commitment, or other things in exchange for sex. They’ve always had free sex with a man they found physically attractive and called it love.
>>17029548but we can change thisdon't reward women without being doubly reciprocated for it (before you do anything you must get twice, once for it, then another in return)all the while we strive to create robot wives
>>17029368https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513821000453
Intelligence probably heavily selected for in early modern humans, see Dunbar social brain hypothess, as well as Tooby and DeVore for cognitive niche hypothesis (popularized by Steven Pinker)Also: We used to have a patriarchy, like, a real patriarchy, as in men just kept women in submission, because what the hell are women going to do, slap you about it? I'm a man, and I'm bigger than you. Anyway, the idea that women "cared" about stuff was fine, but who cares, they don't have any authority and if she steps out of line we'll put her to death. Patriarchy led to a lot of modern societal prosperity (with a lot of bumps along the way) and men got a lot softer and men wanted to believe that women Liked Them For Them, so (under a still-generalized patriarchy) things like courtly love start developing, you get some great romances, etc., but various Marian Catholic style cults that basically revere women's virginity and ideas of women as pure maidens and see also views on prostitutes as poor, poor prostitutes, always molested and therefore forced into it (HINT: they're NOT, they're sexually self-indulgent sociopaths, the female equivalent of GOONERS). Anyway eventually a bunch of laws get passed PROTECTING women from men, and women rapidly get uppity and now I think we all get the idea right, women are skanks who want 6'7 monstrous violent sociopaths, with a mix of neotenous (hairline, no wrinkles, etc, remember women are ALSO prone to ephebophilia in spite of their histrionic fear-mongering over this phenomenon in men) alongside massive facial bones and skeletal and muscular development. All of this is fine, it must come out, we must accept reality as it is not as we have deluded ourselves it is. "Women's rights" is an obscene luxury and expense on the wealth of any society that has it, the equivalent of a heroin habit. It will continue to hollow out our society over the next ~300 years, until the institutions protecting women are gone and all will be made clear again...
>>17029703>It will continue to hollow out our society over the next ~300 years, until the institutions protecting women are gone and all will be made clear again...or until they're replaced by a better version...https://youtube.com/watch?v=hHavHQb7ZK0https://youtu.be/mRlbqt5tkh4
>>17028687the reponse is something you are not expecting. they'd fuck a good looking guy while they'd marry a money having guy. both can be true. depends on purposefucked plenty chicks that really like it, but in the end they settled for the richer dudes. which is the smart play here ngl
>>17028811So, if someone is renting your girl friend out, obviously they wouldn't want you included as someone to be considered. So, they could arbitrarily pick any attribute that you have and just say not that. You're not tall? Tall guys only, problem solved. Sure, there is going to be some. guy that has gotten a big growth spurt using leg lengthening surgeries, and don't forget growth hormone for someone's kid to also rent your girl friend as well. Pick a skin color, and skin color can be changed as well. Your jester nice guy is not someone who is renting your girl friend. Someone who rents your girl friend can not be a nice guy. It can be specifically not you.
>>17028811self reported data is garbage, every scientist knows this. also talk vs action can be very different so there's no value in asking people about their preferences, people lie to others and even themselves. but universities are also politically correct places, in 2026 maybe the most politically correct, so the academics that are aware of this stuff just stay quiet, especially if it's not related to their field. >>17028852>attractive people attract members of the opposite sex I too figured this out in high school (observation-iq 200 apparently). none of this blackpill or dating app data has ever been interesting to me. I've always looked at it and sarcastically thought "no kidding?"
>>17028687because science for the past century has been nothing but propaganda spewing MEN BAD WOMEN GOOD.
>>17030288it's worse than you make it out to be, that's the problem https://youtu.be/Dwf-hXaKBSIwhat do you think happens when 90% of men realise they're pussyless because women today have the option to do chad or nothing
That movie Obsession convinced me that women hate men but also want to be hurt by men.
>>17030288Most of the data on "women prefer resources" comes from the same dude (Buss) who does SURVEYS as studies
