Infinity + 1 is strictly bigger than infinity. Learn Nonstandard Analysis you dumbasses.
>cardinals>nonstandard analysis
>>17029189Define "bigger".
I know of a hotel that OP would be interested in, they have a vacancy despite being full
>>17029189>NonstandardLol, k.
>>17029203Vgh, fine. *unzips massive frog penis*
>>17029189VERY anti semitic thread
>>17029189That's not true infinity, mathcel.
>>17029229The problem with modern math is that cantor defined actual infinity as existing, when it clearly isn't. Only potential infinity exists. You can't say: Oh yeah we a assume this thing exists and has infinite many parts.So yes as you said, the Hilbert hotel can't actually be ful. In fact it would take an infinite amount of time to get every guest move one room. So after one extra guest moves in, one person would always be switching rooms having none forever. So it would be a trick to get the illusion everyone has a room now but it would just be changing people with no room.>Not if they all move at the same time, genius How can they all know? They cant. Since there is a real distance between every room and information cannot be send instantly it take an infinity to notify everyone. So if the first waits until everyone gets the memo he is dead before he can move in. So this is not possible, which means it has to work per induction as i described earlier which also means if 1 moves in its just constantly one changing room.
>>17029203Maybe "it still has what it has before and something new"
>>17029644"true infinity" + 1
>>17029644true infinity has never been tried
>>17029189x+1 is greater than x.The limit if both functions as x goes to ∞ is ∞ and both functions approach infinity at the same rate. Thus ∞ +1 = ∞ for values satisfying ∞>>1x^2 is greater than xThe limit of both functions as x goes to ∞ is ∞, but x^2 goes to ∞ at a faster rather. Thus for any value of ∞, ∞^2 is greater than ∞.
Always sort of wondered who/what keeps posting infinityslop. Is it some dedicated autist? A chatbot? A few dozen people taking turns each week
>>17029203try asking the tax institution to define "bigger" when your income is defined as bigger than upper limit for the range you're trying to fit in you motherfuckerof course you know what OP is talking about don't try to snake your way out of itOP is absolutely right, which just means infinity has no place in mathematics or any serious science
>>17029644>true infinity has never been tried
>>17029189>Infinity + 1 is strictly bigger than infinity.How do you know that?
>>17030653can you count?
>>17030663can you count to infinity?
>>17030650>accountants should be trusted to come up with mathematical definitionsThe genius of /sci/ knows no bounds
>>17030663Your statement has nothing to do with ones ability to count. You should be able to justify your statement to anyone, regardless of their ability or inability to count.
