when did you realize that AI replacing mathematicians is going to mean marxist wordcel academics in the humanities will get to say >I told you so, being a wordcel marxist was the greatest form of intelligence all this timethis is despite the fact that programs have been capable of replacing marxist wordcel slop for a long time before even LLMs but because the total lack of standards in the humanities except ideological adherence and belonging to an approved identity group they can just reject any work they find convenient.gg
I don't get it. Why do you think AI is restricted to math? But also, choose not to live in fear. It will be better for you.
>>17032658>Al replacing mathematiciansWhat makes you think that? Sure at some point human mathematical output might be dwarfed by machines but that doesn't mean mathematical scholars will cease to exist. It's like not being the top student in the class you're still a student and you still want to learn. If none left to understand your field then it no longer remains a field.
>>17032658What about a porn parody called Judith Butthole
>>17032658Their "work" is 100000x easier to replicate for an AI than a unique theorem.There has literally been a generator for their slop since the 90s (https://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/)Besides, what tangible applications have they actually contributed to? Failed education reforms for black students?
>>17033928It’s not easier. Human beings are going to be super biased against AI because they see it as a threat to their social standing. The objectivity of STEM is both its greatest strength and, as it turns out, its greatest weakness, because human mathematicians cannot say that an AI’s proofs do not count because it lacks a soul or some bullshit. But in the humanities, it’s all subjective, so these Marxists are going to be so dishonest and gatekeep the fuck out of their fields.
Humanitists are insufferable, talentless hacks and, at scale, genuinely terrible people. I’d rather listen to a construction worker talk for hours than spend a few minutes engaging with them. t.write for a living
>>17034709Trvth
>>17032658>mathematicians can now solve problems that previously would have taken decades within days/weeks/months with AII bet they're all rejoicing as they can solve for porblems within math and move the field of mathematics further into the frontier
Legitimate question—have you pinpointed an exact ERA where philosophy(which ideally should be the source of the other humanities) became entirely uselessThe field(much like the arts) probably couldn't be saved by anything less than a return to feudal-esque patronages but I'd like to at least know when that became obvious
>>17032658when was the last time you met someone calling himself a geometer?the technology inproves and we progress into another layer of abstractionthere will always be mathematicians because mathematicians are a lot closer to those humanities majors then you realize stem is art
>>17034709>because it lacks a soul or some bullshitSo the Marxists are essentially ratting themselves out as frauds? Just say Mein Kampf, any book by Julius Evola or the Decline of the West has soul, and they won't have a rebuttal because their postmodern "there are no truths only power structures" thinking won't allow them any leeway. Of course, they will be able to rationalise the contradiction, but ignore them at that point because they are indeed denying their own axiom.Again, these are parasites, not academics. They're goal is not science or truth, its subversion and dialectical wordplay to get their way. So when another Sokal or Grievance studies thing exposes their BS again, just ignore whatever dumb shit they say in the Guardian to explain it away, it's always a complete nonsensical rationalisation to get their way.
>>17034890>Humanitists are insufferable, talentless hacks and, at scale, genuinely terrible people. I’d rather listen to a construction worker talk for hours than spend a few minutes engaging with them.I disagree anon
