Can we do this again except keep the telemetry data and not destroy the technology this time?
We didn't destroy the tech, SLS is pretty much the same thing.And it's a waste of resources.USA just didn't have the money to keep this utter boondoggle going. There are a lot of better options for space starting with a LEO infrastructure
>>17034356>and not destroy the technology this time?Not a chance. There's going to be an economic downturn at some point or a war that will draw away resources and it's all going to get left to rot.
>>17034356Sure, despite what the cgi-haters will tell you, Hollywood still has plenty of soundstages left.
>>17034356You actually believe this shit?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HQfauGJaTs
>>17034356>Can we do this againno>Can we do thisno
Has nasa every filmed something above 720p?genuinely curious the ISS livestream is 720p to this day
>>17034467it's to hide the aaylyums, they're only visible @ 1080p
>>17034467The question is whether the compromises in terms of extra antennas and power draw for the additional bandwidth through multiplexing is worth it. Probably not.
>>17034356There's not much money to be made in the moon, The US went there and are going back simply because their enemies are trying to go there. In the first time the Apollo program got cut the moment the Soviets did the same to their equivalent
>>17034474We have star link now bro
Explain in detail what technology we destroyed
>>17034356No, they will all die on the way back along with the high quality original photos and videos and we will only ever get low-fidelity, compressed channel footage. And so it will be. Just the right resolution to hide all AI artifacts.The next question is what will the modern tech overlords do when they realize it was a charade this whole time. The changing of the guard offers opportunity and usually collapse. Will they also march on trumpeting events that never happened to feel good about impending demographic collapse? Maybe they can build a bunker with enough amenities to satisfy their greed.
>>17034356>not destroy the technology this time?I know you're baiting, but it's honestly baffling how dumb people have to be to think this unironically. Like NASA went over the the factories and bulldozed over them or something.
>>17034356Or actually go on the moon. But haters will say its CGI.
>>17034818
