there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those infinities, and... (infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and that infinitely times. and...) continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and that continues forever. and.....(…)… you can continue this process forever. And you can continue that process forever. Ad infinitum. And that ad infinitum. And…(…)…
It just gets down to basic gaza people
>>17036012Cantor killed math. We need to free us from set theory.
>>17036167cantor didnt do it by himself. he has millions of miggers pushing his propaganda
>>17036359we're just gonna devalue "migger" past all meaning huh
https://steve-patterson.com/cantor-wrong-no-infinite-sets/
>>17036377>And it assumes that, somehow, you can put “all of an infinity” into a set. But “all” and “infinite” are mutually exclusive terms – if something is infinite, then you can never have “all” of it.
Can we change certain definitions of infinity to...."Speed at which additional ratio pattern pieces can be observed in the sequence"All infinities are infiniteBut some infinities....are more infinite than other infinities......Infinity Farm
>>17036012>>17036018>>17036167>>17036359Bolzano, Weierstrass, Cantor, Dedekind, Cauchy, etc, were not Jewish. But I guess that doesn't matter to dumb migatard cattle like you that lives in some made-up reality.
>>17038254Most of these did not accept existence of actual infinity. And cantor was jewish.
>>17038399NTA but your literary fiction, where you tried to claim Cantor as a jew for your tribe, got eviscerated and died here.>>17035530
>>17038399>Most of these did not accept existence of actual infinity.They all worked with the concept of sequences with infinite elements as we do today (just different notation for some).>And cantor was jewish.Hardly; though that wouldn't change much since Bolzano, Weierstrass and Cauchy are mostly the ones behind the modern concept of infinity that we use in analysis.
>>17036012math without set theory is weak retardation. Among top defenders of set theory was the Chad David Hilbert (a goy). Don't be retarded.>b-b--b-but infinity is a fantasy made by man :whine :whineMaybe, howver can you NAME the LARGEST POSSIBLE integer? For instance it could be 10^(10^10), (and then the earth magically explodes if you ever mention a number larger than 10^()10^10)? Or it could be any number larger than that, right?If you cannot meaningfully and reliably name alargest number then you're already working with an infinite set of numbers and the celebrated tantrum consisting in claiming there cannot exist a "set having an infinite supply of elements" is nothing but the refusal to qualify the collection of numbers as a set (which exposes you as extremely immature instead of a deep thinker, in other words you should grow up).
>>17038906>10^(10^10)Exponents are already right-associative.
>>17038416Nah they mostly calcuated with POTENTIAL infinity, not with ACTUAL infinity. Learn the difference.>>17038407Its not fiction its reality, i cant find your source. But his mathernal grandpa (besides his converted dad) is the most likely jewish ancestry anyway and the source doesnt claim anything about it. Meanwhile you have records of his brother Joseph Böhm beeing jewish.
>>17038407You still claim Joseph Böhm, his jewish great uncle did not exist ?
>>17039515>Nah they mostly calcuated with POTENTIAL infinity, not with ACTUAL infinity. Learn the difference.So? It follows. Given the obvious definition of finiteness and the concept of potential infinity (which I understand you accept), is the set {1,2,3,...} finite or not? Obviously not.
>>17036012>there arethere aren't though.
>Kronecker sistersEs ist overi
>>17039770>is the set {1,2,3,...} finite or not?There exists no "set of all natural numbers", its already the problem to start that way. There exist a potential infinite number of natural numbers.
