you cannot prove that pi is irrational
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_that_pi_is_irrational
>>17039787it is possible that beyond a certain digit all following digits just happen to be 0the likelihood of this is infinitesimal but infinitesimal is not 0
>>17039790find a flaw in one of those proofs
>>1703979099% of numbers are irrational. Believing pi isn't is irrational.
>>17039777i can prove that jannies just removed my math and physics equation from the Science and Math board.and it was actually a really good one too.
>>17039813it was an equation showing something truly peculiar about the speed of light, but poof they just deleted it.
>>17039806the proofs do not prove that pi could not just by random coincidence happen to repeat after a certain digit, its just infinitesimal probability because as per those proofs it would only be such if by random chance
>>17039813what was the thread number? Curious to read your thread in the archive
>>17039822541143999
>>17039825retard
>>17039827>considering the speed of light vis-a-vis the change in distance at the limit of maximum time dilation is retardedoh i thought you guys were math and science experts.
>>17039828I'm calling you retarded because that isn't a valid fucking post number on /sci/ you fucking faggot.
>>17039832lol oh fuck you're right. well.... they coulda been sensible and moved it instead of deleting it.
>>17039833it would still be on the archive even if moved boards. Why don't you want to share the actual post number? are you embarassed by your thread? or just LARPing? I'm gonna go with LARPing
>>17039834it IS still on the archive, just the wrong board. who said it wasn't? i reposted it on this board.
>>17039836good god anon just link to it already
>>17039790>it is possible that beyond a certain digit all following digits just happen to be 0not possible, the "likehood" is exactly 0 not infinitesimal
>>17039817>do not prove that pi could not just by random coincidence happen to repeatit proves exactly that, pi decimal expansion will never be repeating
>>17039866i got u: >>17039835
>>17039777because its rational
Pi decimals never stop and never show a repeating pattern because it's an osculating wave front.
>>17039869>>17039872no because there is nothing stopping a decimal expansion from repeating by pure chance its just infinitesimal
As a simple counter example.If pi at some point contains an infinite number of 0s it is rationalthis is true not just in base 10, but base 1, 2, 11, etcthere are an infinite number of bases, so eventually one will exist where pi ends in an infinite number of 0since the digits of pi are random, is is guaranteed to happen.
>>17040120>>17040100If a decimal expansion repeats then it represents a rational number. Pi is proven to be an irrational number. Therefore its decimal expansion is guaranteed to not repeat. And this will be true in any base.Repeats -> RationalNot rational -> Doesn't repeatSimple contrapositive
>>17040120basedall numbers confirmed rational
>>17040120But since there are infinitely many digits, it's guaranteed that eventually one of those numbers won't be 0
>>17040280>'s guaranteed that eventually one of those numbers won't be 0no, its 99.99...% likely not 100%
>>17039787Correct, [math]\pi[/math] is irrational. But what about [math]\pi^{\pi}[/math] ?