I think there's something fishy about the AI math hype. >inb4 childish absolutist shills paid off by Anthropic, OpenAI et al come flooding inIn 3...2..1....
They're legitimately good at reasoning and remembering a fuckton of information, which is useful when doing abstract math. Yall fags scared it will start doing critical thinking for you too lmao
>>17040599>They're legitimately good at reasoning and remembering a fuckton of informationthat's not the case, and fails to explain why guided AI use is good at math or computer programming and bad at much simpler things like law or literature.
>>17040589At this point it’s 80% anons fishing for (You)s from demented jeets who love feeding arguments into AI and posting the output, and 20% demented jeets fishing for more (You)s to do that with.
>>17040600It is the case. I'm using it professionally. Just like with humans, you don't just take it on blind faith, but verify. It's better at reasoning than 95% of humans at this point. Now and again it still will do dumb shit or forget a detail, but who doesn't.
Lagacy Chad complaining cause they can no longer get grants for chasing infinite decimal tails that lead nowhere. Shut up and Adapt
>>17040632>AdaptTo what?
>>17040589Yeah, well, we will never know.
>>17040599fpbp
>>17040589I have a tingling in my testicles that there's something off about this thread.
>>17040589Okay, try doing some real math. There are 2^455 binary colorings of a 5x7x13 matrix: how many of those have no monochromatic row, column, or hypercolumn?
