This is a thread dedicated to scientists performing experiments that are too controversial, taboo or unethical to replicate.Let's discuss their merits, flaws and scientific relevance.>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/21_grams_experiment>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiments_in_the_Revival_of_Organisms>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Harlow#Monkey_studies>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_human_experimentation>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_StudyBtw does anyone have a video of the guided rat experiment?>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guided_ratI remember seeing it a long time ago but I can't find it anymore, it seems like it's become lost media.
>>17041145Where there are unknowns, there is room for science. Always more room for science.
>>17041145>unethical to replicateWe can eventually replicate them all (and more!) when brain organoids get complex enough to handle the simulations.
>>17041145>What was the benefit ...I am not an ethics commission btw, I firmly reject that concept in the pursuit of knowledge.
>>17041374Look up “commission”.
>>17041413omg the same word means two or more things; what will we ever do
>>17041415Commission together, like real men can only do.>calls ‘heads’Not-heads. Sorry.
>>17041421If it’s not in the printed edition of both Roget’s and Merriam Unabridged’s Thirds, who cares
>>17041426> “citation needed”> — UghInteresting using of phonetic language. Use it with you cave mates?
>>17041435>Commission together, like real men can only do.So explain yourself in sounds
