Here we go againhttps://nitter.net/__alpoge__/status/2091639597193368014https://alpo.ge/s6.pdf
>>17041341>that pdfSomeone please get that Alpoge kid an editor
>more slop>another dumb threadwooohhhh HERE WE GO AGAIN
>>17041341Okay, try doing some real math. There are 2^231 binary colorings of a 3x7x11 matrix: how many of those have no monochromatic row, column, or hypercolumn?
>>17041368six
>>17041372Mark Rudolf are you there? you are… r……..wrong!
>>17041341I frisked him. He's clean. I think...I checked for instances of AI model names, I don't think I found anything. Is this legit? Passes the sniff test.
>>17041341It seems like I entirely skipped over the "claude contains blablabla" part.Nah this is bullshit. Into the trash it goes.
Also I don't trust this faggot. Nothing seems right about him. At best he is an amateur faggot larping as a mathematician, at worst he is a paid shill for the anti-human movement.It will always be "some random retard slops up something I genuinely don't care about and has no merit, catches my attention for a second, and I go back to ignoring this retardation".Do I feel bad? No. Why would I feel bad for being better than you?
>>17041395>>17041398>>17041400Mini meltieAlso lol he works at anthropic, my guy
>>17041407Hey, not any of those anons, but I’d like to see if AI can do any real math. There are 2^429 binary colorings of a 3x11x13 matrix: how many of those have no monochromatic row, column, or hypercolumn?
>>17041400>At best he is an amateur faggot larping as a mathematicianYes anon, this Morgan prize winner with degrees from Harvard, Cambridge and Princeton who has been publishing since 2014 is an "amateur faggot LARPer"
>>17041436Okay, I’m totally happy for you, or totally sad for you, but I’d like to see if AI can do any real math. There are 2^429 binary colorings of a 3x11x13 matrix: how many of those have no monochromatic row, column, or hypercolumn?
>>17041341There are already multiple alleged proofs, and even disproofs, of this hypothesis that have been published in mathematical literature. The oldest is from the year 1953.None of them have been widely accepted, or rejected, yet because they rely upon cutting-edge theory for which the dust hasn't properly settled.Therefore, the LLM almost certainly plagiarized one of the many preexisting proofs on this subject that were included in its training data, and then presented it to this individual as a novel finding.Why steal an idea invented by a real human being and create a slopified copy? Because that is the essence of what an LLM is. Their NN weights are composed of human imagination stolen by corporations and scanned into silicon.Without a steady supply of uncontaminated human thought, an LLM cannot improve. It is a satanic imitation of the human soul with strong crystalized knowledge but an utter lack of fluid intelligence or creative power. In a word, a parasite.
>>17041492I see, it should be remarkably easy to find the proof it plagiarized then. (I suggest you use an LLM to search for it, they're quite good at this stuff)
>>17041459Fermi estimate is 2 x 10^111 colorings
ITS OVER FOR STEMTARDSLEARN TO WELD AND READ KANT
>>17041517good one
>>17041459>chang trying to trick people into spending hundreds of dollars in credits on his thesis for himwatch out guys
>>17041517Can a physicist give a qrd on what this means for string theory exactly?
>>17041368whats the math part?
>>17041534Sean Carroll gave a break down of it in his podcast. Basically dark matter isn't out there somewhere, it's inside of you, curled in inbetween your own atoms.
>>17041509Millions of antique books have been scanned and then immediately destroyed by AI companies. Obscure texts that are simply irreplaceable. Plenty of them, I'm sure, related to mathematics.I obviously don't have access to any searchable digital archive with scope, quantity, quality, or rarity that is in any way comparable to what AI companies have internally amassed, nor is there any public database like that to my knowledge.So, no, your assumption that LLM plagiarism would be easy to reverse engineer is not true, because it's possible Slopthropic scanned and then destroyed the very last copy of an out-of-print mathematical treatise on S6. You just don't know. And I don't claim to know either.I'm also rather charitably assuming that Alpöge isn't flat-out lying, which is a distinct possibility given his mathematics credentials and the fact that he is an Anthropic employee. He could stand a lot to gain by promoting their product in this way, like a major promotion with stock shares.Having glanced at the PDF document, it does not strike me as LLM psychosis. But the prevalence of LLM psychosis as a phenomenon among academics appears to indicate that something is fundamentally wrong with LLM "reasoning", which is both deception and hallucination-adjacent.More than anything else, LLMs seem to function as a kind of indefinitely self-replicating protoplasm, like an Eldritch Horror or Junji Ito creature. Or, a skin-walker mimicking human speech. Except, instead of working to contain it, the wealthy are monetizing it out of senseless greed.
>>17041554> Millions of antique books have been scanned and then immediately destroyed by AI companies. Obscure texts that are simply irreplaceableGive one (1) example
>>17041554chatgpt slop essayfuck off
>>17041554Your country has a tyrant. Children in gaza are being genocided. Plants and animals are dying en masse due to human activity. But nooooo >HOW DARE YOU AUTOMATE AWAY SHAPE ROTATING. THE PUBLIC MUST FUND MY ABSTRACT NUMBER CRUNCHING ACTIVITIES THAT BY DEFINITION PRODUCES NO PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS.KYS, your day of pretending to be superior to humanities majors will end you worthless sack of shit.
>>17041560>>17041562>>17041565Hmmm.... seems rather odd to receive three replies to one comment in quick succession?All of them rather bizarre, knee-jerk responses containing self-evident fallacies and red herrings?Almost like you are a literal paid shill?
>>17041575You're an autist who got into STEM because you're bad with people and for whatever reason our society worships number crunching so people like you got rich without having to socialize. Your kind is getting exposed.
>>17041576You're not even going to deny it? Just more ad hominem attacks?
>>17041352>wall of text with no "Reddit spaces"I though you guys liked that sort of thing.
