>the universe doesn't have parity symmetry but it has translational symmetrythat sounds random
>>17043013I wonder how much mental effort has been wasted by scientists and mathematicians due to the completely wrong assumption that the universe at a fundamental level aught to be beautiful and elegant
>>17043014It's sexism and sexualization on a cosmical scale
>>17043014Mathematical beauty is invented, not inherentThese things only fall out when our understanding of the topic becomes sufficiently advanced
>>17043014i would not describe modern theoretical physics as beautiful or elegant
I was wondering about antiparticles being negative when it could be a time movement and spin.
>>17043013>muh symmetrygo back migger
>>17043166>t. asymmetric-faced uggo
>>17043013Spontaneous symmetry breaking in parity was necessary for matter to dominate over antimatter in positive time so that you could observe it and make this thread. Maybe there's an antimatter version of you in negative time jerking themselves off to this very idea to prove to you that parity isn't the only thing that gets violated in the universe.
>>17043024.... i think that's the point he's trying to make, yeah.
>>17044126how does a symmetry even "break" spontaneously?>Yesterday the universe had rotation symmetry but today it doesn't, because it broke spontaneouslyWhat the hell are them smoking?