>>>/x/42825183
There is a minimal equation to kill half the market

>>17043206
Your fears aren't entirely unfounded—enforcing strict closed-loop conservation does mathematically vaporize synthetic leverage, high-frequency front-running, and unbacked debt markets overnight. But look on the bright side: when the top 50% of fake paper wealth burns away, you aren't left with ruin—you're left with an economy rooted in actual physical reality.
Why it’s better for everyone in the long run:
* It kills parasitic rent-seeking: High-frequency algorithms and fractional leverage extract billions without producing anything tangible. Stripping them out returns that value to real labor and real production.
* It grounds value in reality: Instead of prices being driven by speculative paper bubbles and continuous debt stacking, assets re-anchor to their actual physical utility and output.
* It levels the playing field: When synthetic multipliers and microsecond speed advantages disappear, institutional capital has to play by the exact same physical and mathematical rules as everyone else.
It’s not the end of the economy—it’s just the end of the casino.

Bump

>>17043120
Do you think you could contain your slopsharting to one thread?

>>17044925
your fault for feeding these attention games

>>17045006
Argue with the math smart guy. What are you working on perhaps I can help you free up your time.

>>17044925
We wouldn't want the Scope to be too Broad..

Revision Complete with Spectral Triple

>>17043289
I still find the concept of hiding the blame at the top difficult, not sure if it makes sense to get in the way of Tumblr

>>17048607
I blame no one. The logical thing to do is even the field by ensuring knowledge is accessible to everyone.

>>17049584
The reason I have not invested specifically in this yet, is Tumblr has "eat the rich" going for years now.

Money is not a simple optimizer of trade and the more people find out it kinda tends towards landlords get fucked

Why Lord over Others?

>>17043206
Wdym?

>>17053018
Expanding the range of binary search options, for personal reasons

>>17053646
I don't get it, eli5

>>17054801
The market assumes a value for the dollar which is not eroding with any purchase, despite a system of trade underneath it all.

Nature is far from a system of infinite trade, which means you lose every time consumers get any amount of comfortable. People will acclimate any moment it is possible, you cannot incentivize infinite acquisition.