https://youtu.be/cGdmTt1GBYs
>>17043743>burn hydrogen>no CO2 emitted>look up inside>combustion reaction>combustion reactions always emit CO2>yet burning hydrogen doesn't>even though you're burning it>no CO2 emitted>only H2Owtf chemistry bros?
>>17043745nta, to make it even worse it combusts way more violently than regular fuel, you can make a primal jet engine with it, meaning with some tubes and some shit, it's on yt.
>>17043745>combustion reactions always emit CO2This statement is false and exceptions are not limited to hydrogen fuel.
>>17043745>>17043799in any case this isn't a combustion engine; there is a fuel cell and an electric motor turns the wheels
>>17043799combustion reaction:fuel +O2->CO2+H2O
>>17043849That is specifically hydrocarbons under ideal conditions.If oxygen is scarce, for example, carbon monoxide becomes a predominant output. More importantly: if carbon is absent in the fuel, it will also be absent in the output. And the presence of any elements that aren't H, C, or O will obviously result in a host of other compounds.
>>17043890ignorance is so bold. don't talk to me again until you read a chemistry book
>>17043743Did they solve hydrogen leaking through basically every material used to contain it yet? Is it even physically feasible to contain a silly little proton+electron in an economically viable manner?
