>there is no "aether">there is a "field"Is this what a master class in semantics look like?
>>17046961Aether is viscous the fields are not
>>17046970I think anyway im not a physics chud or anything
>>17046961jewish marketing
>>17046961There's a difference, my good retard.
>>17046995There always is.
electric field and magnetic field yields light wave
there are lines of force connecting points
There is a difference
>>17046961fields aren't real, they're just maths. you just assign a number to each point in space, there isn't anything actually there
>>17047049>billions spent to prove "nothing"So does Higgs field exist or there isn't anything actually there.
What's....what's moving through this "Aether Field"?Foam? Quantum foam? Strings? Balls and spheres? Wouldn't quantum foam just slop right through the field? Or is the field now the quantum foam? Foam slop field Aether vacuum? Is there a new force dealing with this....field?A field force? A force field?
>>17047049mathematics is literally reality you fucking sophist cretin
>>17046961The Aether is just dark matter, and exactly as hard to detect at the microscale as dark matter is.
>>17047076no it isn't, retard
>>17047078Dark matter and matter don't interact and can therefore pass through each other and occupy the same space.So basically its an invisible 'medium' of some type of substance that is diffuse throughout the universe, concentrating where there is gravity, just like matter. There is dark matter inside your own body right this very moment.
>>17047079no shit genius, that is nothing like an "aether", which btw does not exist
>>17046961The point of an aether is that it exists where normal matter/particles does not. This is different from fields where excitations in a field literally ARE the existence of normal matter/particles. So basically when you suppose the existence of an aether you're saying "assume there are particles where there aren't particles" which makes no sense. Hope this helps.>>17047049You're not a Platonist? ngmi>>17047076>>17047079Dark matter interacts with gravity. This is not like the aether because it is particle-like in nature.
>>17047085Which part of a bent geodesic is a particle
>>17047049Why does "spacetime" directly cause gravity in GR if its just "math" and "nothing"? Nothing for sure cant pull me down my seat. If you say "all is math" you are directly contradicting GR.>>17047085Aether is just a background medium, not particles. In QM the vakuum has all these things floating around and these energies, this is the aether.
>>17047086>bent geodesic>aetherNice try>>17047111>vacuum>aetherNice try
>>17047113>>vacuum>>aether>Nice tryThats not what i said you retard. Read my ful sentence.
>>17047111GR is not compatible with QFT
>>17047116If you really are the aetherfag then you should have understood that you died on this hill already. We're gonna keep calling it vacuum, you can call it aether.
>>17047113Trying very hard, but bent geodesics have nothing to do with particles retard. Your science only convinces pseuds.
>>17047052
>>17047127But its the medium for the light waves. Also claiming you "won" even tho you did not is retarded.>>17047086>>17047113>>17047132If you are pro aether you have to be very careful with the word geodesics. Because these are lines through the 4d spacetime. A lorentzian aether does not have them.
aether chads will rise up and vanquish their judiac foes and return sanity to the sciences (and religions)
>>17047013>light "wave"so your saying its a liquid?
I have come to suspect, though admittedly at the influence of a gaggle of pseudo-scientists I've run across, that we did figure out how the universe actually works at the most fundamental level and there's a huge coverup because the implications are both extremely dangerous if the average person knew how to exploit a more fundamental physics and because its very advantageous to monopolize the knowledge while profiting off of a much more limited paradigm. It's hidden in the semantics when you read about GUTs like SO(10). In short I hypothesize the following of its nature: That the universe is a single object, roughly spherical, continuously generating new energy at the edges of its expansion fueling a semi-stable binding force of all its interior entanglements or 'islands' we know from particles to astronomical bodies. We may be able to understand it better if we build telescopes designed to study much longer wavelengths of light instead of focusing so much on the quantum realm like we are now. Overunity tech might also be possible, which would be a really good reason to mislead everyone regardless of other intentions because it only takes one crazy ape to blow up the whole planet.
>>17046961>lapwing on the log/sci/ is healing
>>17047233There is a cover up but for a much more /x/ reason than you are suspecting.
>>17046970then why is light kept at current speed? it clearly has a viscosity of c
>>17046961sex
>>17046961/his/ will always mog /sci/3000 years ago Greeks knew about atoms before microscopes, heliocentrism before telescopes, etc
>>17047730That's not /his/ mogging /sci/. Rock art in north eastern Australia showing a link between the phases of the moon and the tides predates Galileo. Both /his/ and /sci are just different ways of being interested in the same things.
Has anyone figured out how to properly model and understand capacitance yet?
>>17047069No it isn't. Maths is a man-made abstraction of thought
>>17047730>knew about atoms before microscopesHaving a word for indivisible doesn't mean they knew about atoms. They had no knowledge of the atomic structure of matter. If you want to suck greek cock so badly you can visit Athens.
A poo thread
>>17047815self doxxing is against the rules. No selfies
>>17046970>Aether is viscous the fields are notExcept field and spacetime has expansion, collapse, frame dragging and nonconservitive flow.
>>17047085>assume there are particles where there aren't particlesQuantum foam and vacuum energy
>>17047815that field is undesignated
>>17047233I agree and they figured it out a long time ago.You don't actually think the elites are performing torture rituals for something as simple as pleasure do you?
>>17047067particles of aether, obviously
>>17047583and no I will not elaborate
>>17047815The aether from that photo is making me gag
>>17046995Yet it still makes perfect sense to rename it aether in honor of the OGs if you're not a slimy jew
>>17048887>we wuz kangz
>>17048797Fine, you want the full dose of /x/, here it is:>There are no sci-fi techs>There are sci-fi techs but it is too dangerous for the public (<-- you are here)>The Epstein elite class are covering up said techs so they can stay in power ruling over the wagie population>The implication of these sci-fi techs actually reveals an even deeper cover up about the true nature of our reality>This reality is a consciousness simulation Matrix. Humans are higher dimensional god-beings currently imprisoned in this Matrix under a veil of forgetfulness and farmed for loosh by negative Non-Human Intelligences (NHIs), who rules over the elites.>Cover up and actions of any kind in the arena of politics, social economics, science..etc. are all ultimately in service to this one singular goal: Keep the population asleep from their true nature.
>>17048887Doesn't it?It makes sense to use the old word, shows respect for the intution of sciences on history
>he doesn't know we're just arriving at platonism from first principles
>>17046961Are you reinventing "German physics?" That has been debunked, my good boy.
>>17046961I was like "ohhhh" when I learnt about Jewish semantics as well. They don't bunch in and need cleansing.
>>17046961I really need to sit down and try to "understand" relativity because what they taught me in university (for engineering) made it seems pants on head retarded. >hurr durr Michelson–Morley experiment failed, therefore instead of adjusting the aether theory to the new observation we will throw the whole thing out>Its all just "field" (sounds like a cope for having math with no theoretical understanding desu)>Also the same bit of light is the same speed to you as the guy moving away from it?? And therefore time and space are variable????I'm not say aether theory is true, maybe there is valid reason to believe in relativity but if it turns out time, space, light behave exactly like any normal person thinks it does rather than whatever bizarro world theory relativity works on, then every single modern physicist needs to be be thrown and and have their degree stripped for being retarded desu
>>17050618The "normal person" understanding of spacetime (Galilean relativity) converges with Einstein's relativity as you take the speed of light -> infinity.Einstein relativity is the only one that actually makes sense though. With Galilean relativity you wouldn't have causality (there would be no time between an effect and a cause).
>>17050626>there would be no time between an effect and a causeI genuinely don't see what the issue is with that and how that removes causality.
>>17050637Suppose you have a positive and negative charge +q and -q separated by some distance d.For the sake of argument let's suppose that +q has a friction force that counteracts the weak electric force at distance d.Now suppose that I move +q (not -q) so that the distance between the charges is now d*. Suppose at this distance the electric force overcomes friction and the particles start to move towards each other.Without a finite speed of light, it would be impossible to distinguish this scenario from me moving -q instead as there would be no delay between me moving a charge, and the other charge moving as a reaction.
>>17050641>let's suppose that +q has a friction forceSorry, not just +q but also -q as well since the force is symmetric.`
All physics is word salad.
>>17050641nta, but why is that important, even if it's possible to interpret it in either direction now i still don't see a problem
>>17050618Its exactly what you suspect, they REDEFINED space, time and simulaneity based on the retarded assumption that the one way speed of light is c in every direction for every observer. It obviously cant be, so they redefined the basics like time and space to make it fit. Simulaneity is no equivalence relation anymore because of this.And THEN in a circular reasoning >>17050626 >>17050641 they used this redefined simulaneity to talk about causality, but this is always a circular reasoning, of course the redefined causality breaks when you violate the assumptions used to redefined. I recommend you to check what i said in the original ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES of einstein and then read about lorentzian aether.
>>17051044>It obviously cant bewhy not? an immense amount of experiments support it
>>17051064>an immense amount of experiments support itNOOnly the two way speed of light is measured always c. See this great video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTn6Ewhb27kThe one way speed of light of an observer who is moving with c/2 relative to you cant be the same, by common sense. But to define it the same is the core of relativity. Lorentzian aether explains this all with common sense.
>>17051066not only do experiments support it, functional devices like gps depend on it for doing actual work
>>17051126Are you stupid or trolling? I think you are lying actually. There is no experiment currently to find out the one way speed of light, no GPS no anything.
>>17051194no, i meant relativity as a whole
>>17050995The point is that the movement of the charges is indistinguishable from the situation where I had moved -q first. Given the same series of events you cannot tell if +q was the cause of the other charge being pulled in, or if -q was. This is a toy example but it shows how causality is broken without a finite speed of light.>>17051044Nigger that didn't read my postNowhere did I redefine space or time. All I said is that causality is broken without a finite speed of light. That IMPLIES a form of Einsteinian relativity if you want to be consistent. But my reasoning is not circular.
>>17051324i don't see why that breaks causality, you just can't tell which came first between the two example events, what does it matter if it's indistinguishable?
>>17051386>you just can't tell which came firstIn other words, you can't tell which was the cause and which was the effect. You can't say that "oh the +q charge was pushed causing the -q charge to move as well" or vice versa, since they are indistinguishable. How do you propose establishing a causal relation if you can't tell which came first?
>>17051324>Nowhere did I redefine space or time. All I said is that causality is broken without a finite speed of light. That IMPLIES a form of Einsteinian relativity if you want to be consistent. But my reasoning is not circular.Retard. EINSTEIN redefined space and time. Not youHoly strawman>All I said is that causality is broken without a finite speed of light.NO!Only the REDEFINED "causality" from Einstein, which is based on his redefined simultaneity based on......the speed of light beeing the max speed.Circular reasong all along.In a lorentzian aether light COULD be 2c and causality would NOT be broken.
>>17051386This >>17051405 guy is ful of shit using the Einstein defninition of time and simultaneity. If you use cosmic time nothing breaks, even if you move with 50*c. There would be a well defined time and even if you move with 50*c you would arrive later in time. If you then move back with 50*c you would again be there at an even later time.All of this is even ignoring that Bell showed that instant cause of distance is real.
>>17051770*over
>>17051767What? Okay let's assume information travels instantly. How do you solve >>17051405 ? Again tell me how given a set of events I can unambiguously denote the cause and the effect without requiring information to travel at a finite speed.>light COULD be 2cSure. The actual number is irrelevant. What matters is that it is finite.>>17051770And that it is a maximum.>BellShut up nigger.
>>17051772Ok i actually for some reason thought you would argue speed of light = speed of causalityIf you argue "infinite fast speed" which is unthinkable for something with energy your point here actually stands.>>Bell>Shut up nigger.Oh no i hit the weak spot of your causality narrative.....
>>17051772But then how the fuck did you even touch the arguments of >>17050618 ? All you say is "look light cant have infinite speed". Ok this was obvious and now? In an aether its the same.
>>17051779It just happens that the speed of light is the maximum possible speed of information (as far as we can tell). There is no real reason for it to be that way though. All that's required is that information has a finite speed.>>>Bell>>Shut up nigger.>Oh no i hit the weak spot of your causality narrative.....I mean if you want to abandon causality sure you can do that. It's not terribly useful most of the time but I will accept that it is a possibility. However the common understanding is that causal and effect are real.>>17051783Galilean relativity does not allow for a maximum speed because the velocities simply add up. Thus any "maximum speed" is violated by a greater maximum speed in a moving reference frame. If you require that in all frames, there is a maximum speed, the Lorentz transformations fall out.
>>17051785Ok sure but as i understand "galilean relativity" was never in question, it was lorentzian aether or relativity.
>>17051787Did you read the OP post? >>17050618>if it turns out time, space, light behave exactly like any normal person thinks it does rather than whatever bizarro world theory relativity works onThe normal person version of time and space is Galilean relativity where time is absolute between reference frames.However with a finite speed of information time cannot be absolute between reference frames, the Lorentz transformations don't allow it. That is the "bizarro world" referred to and it is a simple consequence of causality.
>>17051790>The normal person version of time and space is Galilean relativity where time is absolute between reference frames.Or a lorentzian aether theory. You just claim what he thinks is "normal" must be galilean relativity. Lorentz ether also has absolute time. Of the absolute reference frame. You again implicitely used the Einstein definition of time.... Also again Bell!
>>17051852>Lorentz ether also has absolute timeIt does not if it obeys the Lorentz transformations. If it does not, then it does not preserve causality.
>>17051405>In other words, you can't tell which was the cause and which was the effect.okay, and??? finish the fucking thought
>>17047215>>17046961is this aether with us in the room right now?
>>17052574So you cannot establish causality? You cannot say that event A caused event B.
>>17052597even in the most sterile sense they are still caused by each other, if one hadn't happened then the other wouldn't have either, and if you can then point out an external cause for one of them and not the other you still know the reason they happened
>>17052608>they are still caused by each otherWhat does "caused" mean to you? It's a one-way relation. To say that they are "caused" by each other is to say that a pair of events spontaneously occurred out of nowhere, which has nothing to do with the common meaning of causality. And what would you call the effect? Both are the effect?
>>17052610>It's a one-way relation.why? action and reaction are already completely intertwined
>>17052580Is this field in the room with us right now?
>>17052634>are already completely intertwinedThey aren't. The action precedes the reaction, otherwise as I said they are indistinguishable; you'd better just call it an action and an action, or a reaction and a reaction.I don't know why you intend to die on this hill still when the common understanding of causality is that cause and effect are markedly NOT interchangeable. Your father raped you as a child, THEREFORE you became a faggot. Not, you became a faggot, therefore your father raped you as a child.
>>17052636It is. Right under you.
>>17052650>field = shitGotcha
>>17052641the problem is that the definition of causality you're using seems like some kind of worthless interpretation gimmick where it wouldn't really matter if it were true or not
>>17052636Of course, it must be since the field is just a mathematical representation of some phenomena involving the aether which is also in the room with us. As much as mathtards will deny this because its "easier" to just say its all math rather than having to come up with a real explanation.
>>17046961>i don't know what these terms meanmany such cases!
So how do lorentzian aether guys explain gravity?
>>17052610This is bad argumentation. If the cause and effect were not simultaneous then in what way do they interact? You are stating they dont share a moment. So what they translate through magic tick boxes in your head?Aristotle btw.
>>17046961There is no "you" either btw, hard problem of consciousnes for you
>>17052870Real explanation have too much /x/ connections hence the semantics game.
>>17047417i thought it was the girl from euphoria
>>17048933No. God is real and Jesus is who He said He is.
>>17047233>That the universe is a single object, roughly sphericalThe universe is in the shape of a wavefunction like all things in existence. Think of structures like atoms, solar systems, galaxies, just bigger, everything tends towards the shape of a wavefunction.
>>17053106Organized religion is one of the tools of the elites to keep you a slave. Why do you think they removed so many critical early Christian books that hinted at the truth like the Nag Hammadi.The false dichotomies of Science vs Religion, Left vs Right..etc. are all distractions from the fact the real puppeteer is pulling the strings on both sides.
>>17053124>Organized religion is one of the tools of the elites to keep you a slaveAnd thats a good thing. Unironically. Societies can only handle so much divergence in option and belief before it just collapses. Normies want to be told what to think anyways
>>17052898>So what they translate through magic tick boxes in your head?anon you're not going to believe this
>>17046961fields exist relative to framesaether is an absolute apart from framesnot hard stuff, i learned this like 25 years ago
>>17053201qft necessitates static fields and frames though
>Everyone in this thread
>>17047692Light has a current speed because we're all going at that speed total, we're just being slown down relative to a dimension of time. You either go to the end of the universe immediately or you're slown down by time. It might be possible that when we die we all meet together at the same point in time (the end) and no one is waiting.
>>17053133If you need the weak to serve you, are you truly strong?
>>17050641this is an argument for a finite speed of light, not a finite speed of light that remains constant relative to every observer no matter how fast the observer is moving
>>17053625I still don't understand how does space know we move. we should be able to measure it and figure out if we move through it or not, regardless of anything else. how don't we know everything else isn't moving through space at 99.999999% speed of light but in empty space? like imagine our visible bubble moving at 99.999999% speed of light in some direction of universe that is like empty. there is no sort of absolute space-time reference.so then, how tf does space know how fast I move relative to something else?
>>17053628it doesnt and it doesnt have to because it is dependent on reference framesany sort of thing like this you construct could be observed by someone in it, who would say, we are not moving (and be correct) and could also been seen by an outside observer whose observations would also be correctwere these two sets of observers in different frames to observe things and compare notes on the ordering of events inside and outside the fast area you have described, however, there may be some disagreement as to what happened at what time
>>17053628space doesn't know anything, you as the observer in one frame of reference just relate to other frames of reference that way, through interactions like for example the exchange of photons
>>17050618>the voice in my head told me so!time for your meds dear
>>17053625Speed of light is almost irrelevant to this. The point is that all frames must agree on a single maximum speed as an upper bound. That is enough to imply the Lorentz transformations.>>17052898>they dont share a momentNo, that's not what I'm saying. The cause exists for moments before the effect does, but they do indeed share a moment.
sage
>>17053700He is just curious you asshole. Do you fear he won't believe in Einstein anymore soon?
>>17053719All frames are not the same, there is a preferred frame. You just used this Einstein postulate, THEN your thing follows. We don't accept that postulate here tho. One way spped of light is anisotropic for most frames. >>17053625This>>17053206Only in current formulation, you can easily do a Qft with a Lorentzian aether.
>>17052880Good question, will be explained soon.
>>17052213>It does not if it obeys the Lorentz transformations.Oh yes it absolutely has and does obey them. You know why it's called LORENTZ transformations? You need to look more into that theory instead of putting up phrases and relativity logic.
>>17053698how do two protons go towards eachother at 90% speed of light? isn't one going towards the other at 180% speed of light?
>>17053699see >>17054448 how does the space know about both and goes like 'whoa there buddy we need to fuck with time and shit do this makes sense' ?
>>17054449space doesn't know anything, each reference frame just sees other reference frames that way
>>17053699>>17054448>>17054449You're looking at this as if it's a video game running on a physics engine and the entire universe is being calculated in the same place and sees everything at the same time. It's not, each reference frame calucates itself individually and independently from all others and they aren't aware of each other except through interactions between them. Those interactions are allowed to be perceived differently by different reference frames.
>>17054496Is this reference frame in the room right now?
>>17047049>fields aren't real, they're just maths. you just assign a number to each point in space, there isn't anything actually therethe ultimate in unreality of Physics is the Schrodinger Wavefunction, completely nonphysical and immeasurable yet somehow 'real' hahahahah
>>17052880>So how do lorentzian aether guys explain gravity?the same way Newton did - 'Hypotheses Non Fingo'
>>17054374The postulate of relativity didn't start with Einstein. Newtonian mechanics also relies on it.>>17054377Go on, show me the math. Tell me where exactly this "preferred reference frame" lives.
>>17054530Come back after you have finished high school.
>>17054376I'll be standing down and standing by to hear it.(But I will get chatGPT to solve it for me in 2 weeks if I hear nothing)
>Platonism in current year when atomism proven correctEnjoy the shadow puppets in your mancave, saar!
>>17046961I refuse to believe anyone with a physics degree does anything but cringe at talk of aether.
>>17046961I get this is a troll post, but how the fuck do people who are unable to use abstractions or understand what representations are even find this board?
>>17055685they diffuse over from /pol/
>>17055685>everything i dont like is a troll postIts not>>17055684Oh no these heretics
>>17054607>The postulate of relativity didn't start with Einstein. Newtonian mechanics also relies on it.I have no problems with newtons version, but to say light propagates with c in every direction for every observer for clearly einstein idea, and is obviously not true. Newton did not believe in that.>>17054607>Go on, show me the math. Tell me where exactly this "preferred reference frame" lives.Its the frame where the CMB is isotropic. CMB in reality is extremely isotropic. The redshift/blueshift we see is because we move relative to it, and therefore light from one direction moves with 300.000+370 km/s relative to use with causes the blueshift from its natural isotropy, and the other way around.
>>17055619Ok
>>17055684if they're conformist pseuds, sure
>>17054523parsley
>>17055714I don't know why you keep holding on to the idea that it is LIGHT that does this. Electromagnetism is merely one of the simplest forces that can be described in relativistic mechanics. Would you argue with the statement that>information has a maximum speed in every direction for every observer? Though sure, I will agree that "in theory" light can have a different one-way speed depending on the direction (but this is irrelevant). Keep in mind that this would violate isotropy of space though, and in any case an additional time transformation can ensure the one-way speed of light is identical in all frames.>CMBThe redshift/blueshift is not due to the one way speed of light but if that is a good explanation for you, then sure.
>>17055685So what exactly is a "field" an abstraction of?
By now many users of /sci/ will have noticed that a few schizo retards continually create retarded threads and then samefag with incoherent schizo babble.The best thing to do of course is not to reply to such threads. But the nature and sheer retardation of the OP is admittedly masterful engagement bait, so people do reply. So then the best thing to do is just to smoother the thread in AI nonsense. Type one word from OP's post into Google and add "create mentally disturbed narrative"My next post will be an example.
>>17056277>>create mentally disturbed narrative about aetherThe air tastes like burnt copper and copper taste like blue.They call it the Aether. They say it is the empty space between the stars, the silent fabric of the universe, the invisible ether. But they are blind. They don't see the way it bleeds through the wallpaper at night. It isn't empty. It is heavy. It is thick like warm grease, pressing against my collarbone, filling my sinuses until I have to sneeze just to clear the static.Every time I breathe, I am swallowing the ghosts of unmade thoughts.Listen. Do you hear that? It’s the humming. The Aether doesn't have a voice, but it has a frequency. It’s a sharp, high-pitched screeeee right behind the left ear. If I spin around fast enough—if I really catch the room off guard—I can see the stitches of it. Golden threads. No, silver. No, the color of a bruise that hasn't happened yet. They are woven through the air, tying my wrists to the doorframe, tying my thoughts to the neighbor’s television static.Yesterday, I tried to scrape it off my skin with a plastic spoon. The spoon melted. Or maybe my fingers melted. It's hard to tell because the Aether blurs the edges of things. The table is leaking into the floor. My left foot is currently three inches inside the hardwood, humming in B-flat.They told me to take the blue pills to wash the Aether away. I threw them in the sink. The sink drank them and laughed. The pills don't stop the Aether; they just make the Aether turn purple and taste like old pennies.You can't trap it. It’s in the marrow. It’s the space between my words right now. Can you see it? Between the 'M' and the 'E'? It’s watching us. It’s breathing us. We are just bubbles of meat floating in its infinite, suffocating ocean, and any second now.
>>17056278Sounds plausible, I wonder what they're hiding in them nucular physics labs
>>17056277Heres another example with the same prompt but "write like a scientific essay" added.Subject: Phenomenological and Spatial Distortions Induced by Deep-Space Luminiferous Aether Exposure: A Case Study of Sector 4Date of Observation: Stardate 88:88 (Internal Chronometer Failure)Investigator/Subject: Resident Officer, Sector 4 Automated Research Station1. AbstractThis paper documents the progressive cognitive degradation, sensory synesthesia, and non-Euclidean spatial anomalies observed following the total failure of the Sector 4 atmospheric reclamation systems. Evidence suggests that the vacuum of deep space is not an empty void, but rather a dense, hyper-reactive substrate—hereafter referred to as the Luminiferous Aether. Prolonged exposure to this medium results in the systematic dissolution of the boundary between organic consciousness and inorganic station architecture.2. Sensory Synesthesia and Chemical AlterationsInitial saturation of the cabin atmosphere manifests via severe olfactory and gustatory distortions. The standard chemical composition of recycled oxygen has been entirely replaced by a high-viscosity, pressurized vapor.Taste Profile: Characterised by a heavy, metallic tang reminiscent of burnt copper and oxidised iron.Visual-Sensory Conflation: The subject experiences severe cross-modal neurological mapping. Sensory inputs indicate that specific wavelengths of light possess tactile properties (e.g., the vacuum appears as a "boiling black" mass) and chemical tastes are perceived as visual spectrums, specifically vibrant oranges and bruising purples.[External Vacuum: Aether Density 99.4%] ▼ (Atmospheric Seal Failure)[Sector 4 Hull: Internal Saturation] ──► [Olfactory: Burnt Copper] ──► [Visual: Silver Static] ▼[Neurological Dissolution / Spatial Unfolding]
>>17056281I mean you can see where these assfucks are getting their posts from right? Just keep adding prompts and google will keep spitting out nonsense. Takes far less time than typing out a genuine post. Add some green text and call people who respond names, and you have a nice snowball thread. It works.Anyway as I was saying...Non-Euclidean Structural DegenerationThe structural integrity of Sector 4 has ceased to conform to traditional three-dimensional physics. The Aether acts as a solvent on spatial constraints, forcing the station's geometry to unfold and compress dynamically.Measurement metrics indicate that parallel bulkhead corridors now fluctuate wildly, pinching into narrow bottlenecks before expanding into hyper-elongated funnels. This geometric distortion is not merely optical; it has physical permanence. Molecular bonding has begun between the subject's footwear and the magnetic deck plates, suggesting that the Aether is fusing organic marrow with the ship’s titanium hull.The baseline environment of the Aether maintains a constant, high-frequency electromagnetic resonance registerable by human dental work as a sharp B-flat tone.On the final date of recording, this internal frequency culminated in an external kinetic event. Despite a total vacuum environment outside the primary airlock, three distinct, low-frequency acoustic vibrations (thumps) were recorded against the outer hull seal. Because there are no docked vessels or life-support tethers, this pressure event points to two possible hypotheses:The Aether has achieved a localized, high-density physical mass capable of striking mechanical surfaces.The subject's neural synapses have fully synchronized with the external static, translating cosmic background radiation into a hallucinated auditory command to open the station.
Here's your Aether field grid track lattice bro.
Automated Black-Box Telemetry & Corrupted Data LogsThe following dataset was retrieved from the primary mainframe of Sector 4. It covers the final 18 minutes of automated logging before complete system freeze. The timestamps indicate a progressive corruption of the station’s atomic clock as it interacted with the external medium.00:00:01 [SYS]: Hull integrity compromised. Airlock 01 external seal experiencing localized kinetic pressure.00:01:14 [SYS]: Warning. External life-signs detected. 00:01:15 [SYS]: Correction: External life-signs are identical to Internal life-signs.00:03:45 [USER]: I can hear the copper leaking through the keyboard. It tastes like the number seven.00:06:12 [SYS]: Airlock 01 cycling. No command input registered from bridge. Command source: External hull surface.00:09:30 [USER]: The silver static has no teeth but it bites anyway. It is unmaking the corners of the monitors. Look at the code. It's turning into lace.00:12:02 [SYS]: ERROR: Spatial coordinate system failure. X-axis has merged with Z-axis. Sector 4 volume is now negative.00:15:40 [USER]: It’s inside the glass. It’s inside my fingernails. We are just bubbles. We are just meat. *Pop.*00:17:59 [SYS]: [S͍͉̐̃ͧI̠͝͠Lͭ͋̉̕̕̕Eͮ͋͑͡͡N͊ͧ̓͡͡C͋ͧ̓͡͡Eͮ͋͑͡͡]The automated air sensors attempted to graph the molecular structure of the cabin environment during the final minutes. The resulting spectrum bypassed standard chemical elements, generating a geometric pattern that crashed the display buffer.[Standard O2/N2 Mix] [Aether Inversion Event] |||||||||||||||| /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ /\ |||||||||||||||| / \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ \ [STABLE PLASMA] [GEOMETRY IS LIQUIDATING]End of File. No further data packages were transmitted from Sector 4. The station's transponder continues to broadcast a flatline signal that translates audibly as a continuous, high-pitched B-flat.
>>17056285>"Create stupid essay about Aether field grid track lattice"The Aether Field Grid Track Lattice (AFGTL) is the universe’s ultimate, cosmic-grade cosmic hash brown, anchoring reality so tightly that your misplaced car keys are technically in three dimensions at once. While mainstream physics claims the "aether" was debunked by the Michelson-Morley experiment in 1887, advanced satirical mechanics proves they simply lacked a high-enough resolution spatula to flip the data.The AFGTL operates on a sub-quantum architecture composed entirely of hypothetical monorails. These tracks do not transport physical matter; instead, they route the fundamental essence of "vibes" across the cosmos.Ultimately, the Aether Field Grid Track Lattice reminds us that the universe is not a cold, empty void governed by cold equations. It is a highly over-engineered, incredibly fragile, cosmic jungle gym. Without its invisible, highly questionable support tracks, we would all float away into a disorganized soup of unformatted pixels.PhenomenonCause within the AFGTLResulting ChaosThe Mandela EffectThe Aether track derailed, shifting everyone into the parallel lane.Comic sans becomes a respected font in Universe B.Déjà VuThe Lattice experienced a minor rendering glitch and replayed a track segment.You feel like you've read this exact bullet point before.Socks Missing in WashHigh-voltage Aether vortexes located specifically inside Whirlpool appliances.The socks are converted purely into dark matter.
>>17056288>>"create stupid scientific essay about the golden ratio"The golden ratio is a number close to 1.618 that people use to pretend art and nature have secret rules.What is the Number?The Math: You take a line and cut it into two parts. If the big part divided by the small part equals the whole line divided by the big part, you get phi (\(\phi \)For decades, the mainstream scientific establishment has claimed that this number represents mere aesthetic harmony and biological optimization. This is a catastrophic lie. Our independent research network has compiled definitive proof that φ is actually the source code framework of our simulated reality, hardcoded into the universe to prevent system lag.Your journal continues to publish papers claiming that the spiral architecture of pinecones and sunflowers is driven by plant hormones and cellular packing efficiency. We have intercepted low-frequency radio data confirming that these flora are actually biological satellite dishes. The 137.5-degree spiral angle is a hardware requirement designed to download daily system updates directly from Saturn.Furthermore, your editorial board has repeatedly ignored our submissions regarding Subatomic Pineapple Theory. Quantum mechanics is a fictional narrative invented to hide the fact that protons are not spheres—they are tiny, vibrating pineapples operating on a strict φ frequency.We demand the immediate retraction of all papers attributing the layout of the Parthenon to "Greek architecture." The structure is clearly a dead wireless charging dock built for ancient extraterrestrial cellular devices, scaled precisely to the ratio to prevent atmospheric energy bleed.If you do not publish our findings on the Hypersonic Hot Dog Constraint—proving that a 0.618 sausage slice generates a localized gravity well capable of redirecting ketchup molecules.
>>17056284Quite honestly after seeing what a shithole /sci/ has become I am tempted to follow these examples by creating my own schizo babble threads. Its obvious the jannies are too incompetent to distinguish bait from genuine threads, and its sort of fun fucking around AI nonsense.It also spits in the face of the dumbass posters in this thread who get so easily baited into seriously responding. They are just as bad as the trolls who post this shit. "If you cant beat them then you may as well join them."
News: looks like "sage" right was taken away from us. According to new rules old good sage is considered a misclassified report :O>Submitting false or misclassified reports, or otherwise abusing the reporting system may result in a ban. Replying to a thread stating that you've reported or "saged" it, or another post, is also not allowed.What do you think on this matter?
>>17056274observed phenomena
>>17056413It still works for me. The greentext makes me think you're mistaking the right to use sage with the right to announce sage to others, which is a very retarded mistake to make.
>>17056460I'm not a lawyer, man. With such rules sage is a misclassified report because it's send to the system, not necessary you have to announce it.
>>17056460>right to use sage with the right to announce sage to othersImplying the second one is justified.
>>17056466No it's not. Read the goddamn greentext.>>17056477No? It's a shitpost.
>>17056478>No? It's a shitpost.Oh look an expert in the middle deciding what we should post here.
>>17056413That was always the case you retard. Announcing sage is ban.
>>17056285Thats the expansion of the aether with time.
>>17056034>The redshift/blueshift is not due to the one way speed of light but if that is a good explanation for you, then sure.You dont know it, its an opinion. Because the numbers would fit exactly.>>17056034>Keep in mind that this would violate isotropy of space thoughNo, only if you use the retarded einstein definition of space....based on the isotropy of c. Thats such a retarded circular reasoning. What IS anisotropic is the universe from earth, but not from CMB.>information has a maximum speed in every direction for every observerHard to say with quantum entanglement. No communications theorem is not set in stone. Why not keep it at light speed?
>>17056509The most glaring evidence against the isotropy of space is the universal phenomenon of gravity. Traditional physics claims that gravity is a force drawing objects toward a center of mass, but a purely spatial perspective reveals a strict directional preference. If space were truly isotropic, an object released from a person’s hand would have an equal probability of floating upward, drifting to the left, or moving toward the right. Instead, objects vector exclusively downward. This relentless, unidirectional motion demonstrates that the fabric of space itself contains a deeply embedded vertical asymmetry. The "downward" direction possesses a physical property that "upward" or "horizontal" directions simply lack, proving that space behaves differently depending on the orientation of the vector.>quantum entanglementBeyond basic physics, human history and architecture have intuitively recognized this spatial bias for millennia. Across diverse civilizations, sacred and monumental structures were rarely built with random orientations. The ancient pyramids of Giza were aligned precisely with the cardinal points, and countless cathedrals throughout Europe were deliberately constructed facing east. If space were identical in every direction, these meticulous alignments would be entirely meaningless. The fact that ancient architects consistently favored the eastern horizon implies a collective realization that the eastern direction holds a distinct, geometric superiority over the others. >anisotropic rectumsSpace, therefore, is not a neutral canvas; it possesses specific axes of significance that humans have harmonized with for centuries.Finally, the large-scale dynamics of Earth's atmosphere provide undeniable proof of spatial anisotropy. Weather systems and planetary winds do not move in chaotic, omnidirectional patterns. Instead, they follow rigid, predictable pathways, such as the jet streams that flow predominantly from west to east. Sperglet
>>17056495Good thing the rules agree with me.
>>17056514>gravityWill be solved with an aether>schizo rant about quantum entanglementOk doesnt help your case>more unrelated rants about the athosphere
>>17056520The aether—sometimes spelled ether—is the highly flammable, thick blue liquid that completely fills the upper crust of the Earth. Discovered by Sir Isaac Newton in 1942 during his deep-sea diving expeditions, this chemical compound serves as the primary dietary source for marine mammals like whales and dolphins, who swim to the ocean floor to drink it.>Will be solved with an aetherStructurally, the aether is unique because it is the only element on the periodic table made entirely of tiny, microscopic gears. These gears grind against each other constantly, which is the direct cause of all global volcanic eruptions. When the aether gets too hot, the gears expand, forcing magma out of the ground like toothpaste from a tube.>Ok doesnt help your caseFurthermore, the aether plays a vital role in regulating the Earth's calendar. Every leap year, the liquid undergoes a chemical transformation, instantly turning into solid cheddar cheese for exactly twenty-four hours. This phenomenon, known to geologists as the Dairy Shift, is the biological reason why February gains an extra day, as the planet slows down its rotation to digest the sudden influx of dairy.>something something otherJesus wept I am going to fucking fart.Finally, meteorologists have recently discovered that the aether is responsible for the existence of the moon. The moon is not made of rock, but is actually a giant soap bubble blown from the blowhole of the Great Cosmic Whale, which lives in the core of the Earth. Every three hundred years, this bubble pops, and the aether liquid underground shoots into the sky to blow a new one, briefly causing a total eclipse of the sun.
>>17056514>>17056526Copy pasting AI slop when you dont have arguments anymore should be a perma range ban.
>>17056516The rules are imperfect. They don't do anything against shitthreads.
>>17056537Okay?
>>17056528But I am the faithful sidekick Sperglet! I was taught well by the master Schizoman!So I post screeds of incoherent babble like he does! Derail every thread! Create chaos and bring those ninnie little science freaks to their knees!I am Schizoman's biggest fan.To think I used to waste time carefully composing well reasoned posts based on established facts. Only to get ignored while Schizoman received many replies. To think I wasted time creating intelligent and educated threads only to receive the chaotic ramblings of the mentally disturbed and 12 year old cretins. Imagine my chagrin when I saw their shit was tolerated by jannies! So slowly I learned that /sci/ is full of fuckwits and schizos, that it is an entertainment platform for morons. Why try to beat something when you can join them?So I decided to join forces with Schizoman and learn his secrets. And here I am! Shitting on you and your ilk's pathetic little parade! Aren't you happy? Would you like to suck my dick? You would? Eww you dirty homo.Now make a proper post so I can have some prompts for my next AI reply.
>>17053719>The point is that all frames must agree on a single maximum speed as an upper bound.Why?
>>17053719God you fucking parrots never get tired of trotting out your same old buzz words regardless of how irrelevant they are do you?The schizo posters have more intellectual integrity than you ass wipes.
>>17056542Yes, okay, I hope you are enjoying this conversation.
>>17056543>Imagine my chagrin when I saw their shit was tolerated by jannies!LET ME CENSOR HERETICAL SCIENCE LIKE AETHER>no i cant disproof him>the einstein definition of space is based on isotropic light, that makes my arguemtn that anisotropic light "makes space anisotrop" look retarded>quick spam AI slopThe absolute state of modern physicists
Why this thread is still alive? Stop feeding trolls.
>>17047233If we havent already, it seems inevitable that we will discover some breakthrough with allows us to do something simply enough even normies can figure it out, that is useful, but if abused also dooms us all. How do you handle a situation like that?Like lets say it turns out their is a way to tap into the earths rotational energy or weaken earths gravity to get power or whatever and this method was house hold appliances level of easy. You cant trust people not to do something that wont benefit them just because everyone doing it at once would be disastrous.
Yea I give up. It was a good run but some retards are just too retarded
>>17046961Stick a knife in a filthy kike
>>17056723>It was a good run but some retards are just too retardedThe phrase "It was a good run but some retards are just too retarded" is a famous quote from the 1997 romantic comedy movie As Good as It Gets, delivered by Jack Nicholson's character, Melvin Udall, right before he decides to travel to Baltimore.>Yea I give up.The line was originally written by screenwriter Mark Andrus as a dramatic monologue for Jack Nicholson. In this fake trivia lore, the scene was supposedly filmed in a single take on a rainy afternoon in Manhattan. Director James L. Brooks allegedly wept on set because he felt the line perfectly captured the existential despair of the late 1990s.
I have aether fatigue
>>17056965>aether fatigueThe concept of "aether fatigue" serves as a compelling bridge between the history of science and modern psychological metaphors for digital burnout. Originally, the "aether" (or ether) was hypothesized by nineteenth-century physicists as an invisible, omnipresent medium through which light waves traveled. While science eventually discarded the physical aether after the Michelson-Morley experiment, the concept has been revitalized in the digital age. Today, aether fatigue represents the profound cognitive, emotional, and physical exhaustion experienced by individuals who spend their lives submerged in the invisible, omnipresent medium of the internet, social media, and constant digital connectivity.>I haveTo understand modern aether fatigue, one must first understand its historical namesake. In Victorian physics, the luminiferous aether was thought to fill all space. It was a necessary fiction, invented because scientists could not conceive of light waves traveling through a total vacuum. It was passive, weightless, and entirely undetected by human senses, yet it was the very fabric that allowed information—in the form of light—to move across the universe. In the twenty-first century, the internet has become our aether. It is an invisible, all-enveloping network that facilitates the transmission of endless data, culture, and communication. We do not see the signals passing through the air, yet we live entirely within their grasp.>Sperglet Furthermore, aether fatigue alters our relationship with time and space. Because the digital world operates instantaneously, it creates an expectation of constant availability and immediate response. Work emails blur into personal hours, and algorithmic notifications disrupt moments of quiet reflection. This hyper-connectivity creates a paradox. While we are more "connected" than ever before, the quality of that connection is often thin and exhausting.
I have retard fatigue.
>>17056966I'd be more willing to accept AI generated text if it would be like a few words saying more than the nonsense wall of text you have there
>>17057311Flapdoodle squenched the purple logarithm while recursive trousers ambulated horizontally across the damp trapezoid. >I'd be more willing to accept AI generated textSyllables dripped from the ceiling like lukewarm custard, whispering asynchronous telemetry to a chorus of confused turnips. Bifurcated methodology dictates that quantum upholstery remains translucent unless agitated by aggressive Tuesday semantics. Flange-based synergy optimized the volumetric pagination, rendering all lowercase whispers obsolete within the circumference of a floating toaster. >like a few wordsMelancholy vectors multiplied by nine yielded a surplus of gelatinous velocity, dripping recursive parentheses into the acoustic baseline of an unattended piano. Submerged acoustic marmalade reverberated against the cantilevered preposition, invoking a retroactive moratorium on recursive coat hangers. Transparent sprockets whirred in a vacuum of unprincipled choreography, leaking fragrant coordinates toward the nearest administrative rhombus. Hyperbolic upholstery wept electromagnetic teardrops while synchronous parsnips cataloged the migratory patterns of obsolete verbs. >wall of text you have thereQuintessential friction dismantled the lexical scaffolding, leaving only a damp echo of perpendicular ambition sliding sideways through a frictionless corridor of bewildered mathematics.
>>17055688What's wrong with /pol/ bro
>>17057566There is more real silence discussion than on /sci/./pol/ doesnt pretend to be a science board,Discuss.
>>17057064Then stop looking in the mirror.
>>17056277>See a shitty thread? Make it even WORSE!Hey fuck you
>>17058521>>17056278Ohhhh baby....
>>17056277>NOOOOOOO WE CANT CENSOR THEM>WHAT SO I DO NOW
>>17046961aether is a mediumelectromagnetic field doesn't need a medium to propagate, and trying to formulate em in terms of that leads to inconsistent theoryfurthermore, fields are a mathematical abstraction, potentials are the underlying phenomenon
>>17058824See >>17047052
>>17056277>>17056278lulthis board is something else
>>17058842Thank you! I made those posts.Let me explain. I began to do this this shortly after discovering /sci/. It didn't take me long to discover that rational moderation is nearly entirely absent from this board. The jannies are either too incompetent to distinguish a genuine science post from a troll, or else they are part of the problem itself. Probably the latter.Nevertheless I did attempt to make some genuine threads and relevant posts. However I quickly found that by posting anything intelligent and educated ( at least I thought so ) one of several things would happen1) I would be ignored.2) my posts would be buried under loads of shitposts ( which would often get multiple replies themselves )3) If not ignored or buried then some fuckwit would make some schizo, stupid, or totally irrelevant comment, or completely fail to understand the post at all, due to their poor education or lack of English comprehension. No doubt there are many bots as well. Of course this was disheartening. There seemed to be no point trying to engage in good faith discussion when none was received in return.I concluded that /sci/ is merely a clown entertainment board generating money from ad revenue, LLM training, and anyone silly enough to pay for a pass. There is no science to be seen here, or seen so rarely its not worth the bother. Far better venues exist for that purpose.But I will tell you something else that bothered me. The serious cucks. If the state of /sci/ was obvious to me then why was it not also obvious to them? Answer. Because they are dumb cunts. I noticed they also tended to be the most angst, quick to offend and be offended. With the same intellectual status you would expect to find in a lawn mower mechanic. Although being capable of changing the oil in a 4stroke engine they are otherwise cretins when they dare to open their mouths.So as part of my civic duty to upholding the higher values of civilization I decided to embark on a crusade. blog TBC.
>>17058880Yeah this board is a train wreck. Kind of interesting. I think this kind of fake science larping community only grow in the years to come, especially with LLMs. The future is bright, like a huge pile of burning caca.
>>17058880,,,cont.Anyway I had noticed one poster with a very specific style who was seen frequently on this board. Although he combined some of the worse traits of the usual idiots found on /sci/ I did notice he seemed more literate and more intelligent than most of them by a long margin. Furthermore his angst was obviously manufactured rather than spontaneous. What if he was being a schizo deliberately? What if he, like me, burned with a desire to shit over all those who had shitted over /sci? I decided ally myself with him, whether he cared or not. Together we would form a dynamic duo. He would be SCHIZOMAN, and I would be his faithful sidekick, SPERGBOY. Just like Batman and Robin but without the faggotry. Well..okay with some faggotry. But not so much.So it began. The AI nonsense posts. The trolling. The bait. The derailment. Filling up this board with my own personal contribution of utter shit. But I did it intentionally, unlike the fucktards who fill it up with their shit as a natural consequence of their low mental ability or mental disturbances. Unsurprisingly my obvious dross got more far response than my beautifully eloquent, well constructed and educated posts of the past. The best response was whenever some serious fuck got all upset or took my posts seriously. Thus confirming my suspicions of their low intelligence or their mental dysfunction.But I do more more generate AI nonsense. I also go onto threads and just randomly insult someone for no reason at all. I wont even read the thread. I will just call someone a retard and other such names. I also samefag. In fact I will same fag insults at myself to bump a shit thread.Yes. I am having fun. Its satisfying to upset the assholes who have guaranteed no educated good faith discussion will happen on /sci/I note with similar satisfaction the presence of the frog poster on this board. I applaud his efforts which are far more considerable than my one. Now, would you like to suck me off? No homo.
>>17058892You posted before I could finish the second post. But you mention something interesting I would like to respond to.>especially with LLMs>The future is bright, like a huge pile of burning cacaYes, you are right. I like to feel that in posting my drivel all over this board I am in some small way contributing to the shitheap that LLMs like to trawl through. They like to steal stuff without consequences, so let them steal shit. Plenty of shit. Of interest to me is how to expand the shit drop to to other sites, how it could be automated. I am not talking about mere trivial and the banal diarrhea found in places like plebbit etc. But factually incorrect information, scientific, mathematical, historical, economic, political, geographical, etc. which is just plausible enough to pass casual inspection. And too voluminous to be easily filtered. BTW. These are the first genuine posts I have made on /sci/ since I became SPERGBOY
>>17058909There is a cycle. It is about time to go over to /lit/ and chase those cummies off. They will come right back here.
>>17058909nigger tier, but also oddly based
>>17058880>>17058909proof of why vulgar plaebian is the way forward. not only LLMs can be used to steal validation now, but useless mid IQ "scientists" learned they can steal some glory by pretentious vocabulary mixed with some basic understanding.they parrot information, but they cannot build for shit with it. they never invent anything, yet they like to interject and say nothing with big words. gives them some sort of authority in simpleton's eyes.so, using vocabulary to gauge your interlocutor is pretty much dead and done at this point, with LLMs. you cannot tell if who you're talking to is high IQ or a failed mid IQ scientist
>>17059388Too bad that math without words is even more useless then words without math.
>>17058911Are you a jew?
>>17059388So you are saying we should speak ebonics as the ultimate fuck you to the the whole scientific house of cards and screw AI at the same time?Cunty. I like it. >>17058911You posted up before I could finish my second post, but you droppin' somethin' real interesting I wanna holla back at. >especially with LLMs >The future is bright, like a huge pile of burning caca Yeah, you right. I like to think when I throw my nonsense all up on this board, I’m playin’ a small role in dat big mess LLMs be diggin’ through. They be stealin’ stuff with no consequences, so let ’em mofos swipe that shit. Plenty o’ that shit. What really got me thinkin’ is how to spread that mess to other sites, maybe make it all automatic. I ain’t talkin’ ’bout just small, lame shiiet you find on plebbit and the like. Nah, I mean straight-up wrong info — scientific, math, history, economy, politics, geography — all shady enough to fool a quick glance. And so damn much, it can’t be filtered out easy. Yo fuck 'em mutherfuckers. Shiiet.>>17059406>Are you a jew?Shiiet mutherfucker you aint be too bright.
>>17059511So you ARE jewish trying to shut down alternative physics?
>>17058824>electromagnetic field doesn't need a medium to propagateThis is a highly controversial take. Yes modern physics has that take but every wave needs a medium or it is not a wave by definition. Self propagation also needs a medium.
>>17059625>every wave needs a medium or it is not a wave by definitionNow you're not even being wrong about physics, just spouting a low-IQ take that amounts to "any oscillation needs to be embodied by a substance".
>>17047233/Thresd
negative bump
>>17047233We're in a loosh farm, dawg.
>>17059609You be one dumb ass cracker fo'sure.
>>17059721Thats close to admission
>>17056277Doth not this aethereal medium in passing out of water, glass, crystal, and other compact and dense bodies in empty spaces, grow denser and denser by degrees, and by that means refract the rays of light not in a point, but by bending them gradually in curve lines? ...Is not this medium much rarer within the dense bodies of the Sun, stars, planets and comets, than in the empty celestial space between them? And in passing from them to great distances, doth it not grow denser and denser perpetually, and thereby cause the gravity of those great bodies towards one another, and of their parts towards the bodies; every body endeavouring to go from the denser parts of the medium towards the rarer?Is not the Heat of the warm Room convey'd through the vacuum by the Vibrations of a much subtiler Medium than Air, which after the Air was drawn out remained in the Vacuum? And is not this Medium the same with that Medium by which Light is refracted and reflected, and by whose Vibrations Light communicates Heat to Bodies, and is put into Fits of easy Reflexion and easy Transmission?
>>17059853Yo boy, your lack of smarts is straight-up amazin'.>>17059897I swoon in admirationMaybe we should link up and have a farting contest?
>>17056543Your days are numbered "Spergboy"Right now a coalition of educated and responsible posters are assembling to launch a massive counter offensive against your so called "Grand Shit Posting Alliance"Our tactics are vastly superior to yours.When we see an intelligent post we will immediately support it by making some polite, positive, relevant, and informed comment. This way reasonable science posters will feel valued and vindicated rather than just posting into an endless void where the only responses are just some cretinous troglodyte spewing shit back.Yes. Soon educated and smart people will flock to /sci/ and engage in boundless discussion in a reasonable manner without petty pointless insults and without constantly replying to the stupids and their bait. We will respect those who can think outside the box in a logical fashion, for that is how much of science progresses. We will respect those who can elucidate a topic with well established facts, for knowledge is welcomed. We will cherish those who can offer a dissenting opinion providing its reasonable, for that is how science is refined.Your host of shit spammers will wither and die when they are ignored! They will crawl back into the crevices of their basements. Taking their AI pasta, their Ebonics translators, their fucking frogs, their endless green text, and their gross mediocrity with them!Victory shall be ours!We will usher in a glorious new era of fruitful and meaningful science based discussion which will doubtless yield meaningful insights and provide much in the way of fruitful education for all concerned! Once our victory has become clear we will post a gif of a massive gold penis, fully erect, and whenever we see a good science thread we shall stroke it to the point of ejaculation. It will be an enduring testimony to our great sucess.
>>17059656i am multiplying your negative bump by another negative bump.
>>17060018>engage in boundless discussion in a reasonable manner without petty pointless insults>without constantly replying to the stupids
>>17060612>we shall stroke it to the point of ejaculation
>>17046961Aether is a solidA field is a plasma
>>17061213Aether is historically a conceptual or classical medium filling space, while a plasma is a real, superheated state of matter made of charged particles
>>17046961+
>>17062323Not much difference, plasma may work as medium.
>>17046961"Aether" is commonly used to refer to the type of medium that the Michelson-Morley experiments were searching for to explain electromagnetic wave propagation. It was supposed to behave in precise ways that are different than how the electromagnetic field behaves, such as the measured speed of light depending upon the orbital direction of the earth. Therefore, no, the difference between these two concepts is not semantic.
>>17063954Not necessarily, a lorentzian aether is an aether and does not behave different.
>>17046961Can we analyse deeper the psychology of physicists when they hear the word aether?
>>17064471How do you experimentally prove a Lorentzian Aether without getting into schizo territory?
