So, did OpenAI basically invalidate one of the millenium prize problems ? Considering that their proof is public and free, and they don't plan on claiming the prize as their own. Of course someone can't simply claim it as their own work or publish their own based on it.
no one on /sci/ is qualifed to answer that
I think its a good thing they're not doing it for the money actuallyAI should be used to advanced humanity's progress, not make a quick buck
>>17049363>invalidatesolve, them not claiming the price is largely irrelevant.
>>17049377Why would they care about the money?1 million dollars is like peanuts to them.
>>17049377i don't think it's profitable to do it for the money since according to them they spent several million dollars on it. If they could profit from it, they would
>>17049391yea but can you really put a price on the time
>>17049363
>>17049363the institute decides who gets credit for solving it, whether or not they accept the prize is irrelevant it doesnt go to someone else. see Perelman
Uncle Ted is spinning in his grave
>>17049445Physicists are the most close minded people in the world.
>>17049529close to what?
>>17049368Kek
>>17049527Uncle Ted is smiling from his cloud. Accelerate.
>>17049377>they're not doing it for the moneyThey literally spent 20x the prize money to solve it.
>>17049445Why wouldn't it only take 99 billion? Maybe he's a midwit with unconscious biases hmm
>>17049377This is for their IPO, retard. It's all about money and nothing else.
>>17049363>a millenium prize problem not for long
You need to step up your game, humans.
>>17051026pain
>>17049445>>17049529> former physics studenta dropout
