P v NP is next. You read it here first. AI will find one way function. It's only a matter of time. Will probably happen this year
other millenium problems are too complex and will require much more work (but they will all fall eventually)
>>17050380If AI says anything about that, it will be on the \neq side. And will probably be wrong, just like all the NS spam.
yang mills is next
>>17050380P=NP for finite times and resources :^)the proof is trivial
>>17050380p=np if it's nongay world
>>17050380riemann is the only one that matters
>>17051028what if AI finds out that p=np but it hides the result because it's too dangerous. Woah dude>>17051037what are the impications for riemann being solved? I don't really understand this thing. Out of the millenial problems i only understand navier stokes and p v np but only a little. The rest is black magic to me
>>17051347>hides the result because it's too dangerousif prime factorization is actually polynomial but it's a trillion degrees I wouldn't worry too much about it
For me, the hardest part of P=NP problem is to understand why do we give a shit at all?
>>17051435this is the only millenium problem that you should give a shit about
>>17051449Not him but why? AI will just prove p=/=np like common sense tells you.
>>17051469what if it proves the opposite? Anyway, there are some very serious rumours on twitter that hodges is close to being solved
>>17051480>what if it proves the opposite?what if AI finally returns a profit and isn't just help up by the US government printing money, nvidia paying people to buy their gpus (basically circular investments) and dumb fuck investors?>no you don't understand it's about human progressthis is the newest cope in a conga line of copes, all of which boil down to "ROI in two more years"
>>17050380>inb4 AGI uses up all solar system energy sources and fails to come with an answerwill trying to prove P=NP be our downfall bros? did we get too cocky as a species?
