is AI the great filter? is it the reason we are alone in the Milky Way galaxy?
>>17050717Didn't the so-called "experts" say similar things about smashing particles together during the construction of the Large Hadron Collider? FUD caused this.
>>17050717how much are indians being paid to spam this shit accross multiple boards?also, do people really fall for this shit? both as in the fake store and the "muh AI is a threat" bullshit?
I hate it when people use made up percentages like this instead of just "decent chance"
>>17050717Get a better eschatological narrative, we've had enough of these second hand, para-religious, universalistic jewish dreams.
>>17050717Grade C schizo developer who recently "resigned". He probably worked on their front end web shit.
>>17050792I'm not indian you kvetcher, do you guys always have to resort to "your brown!" now to derail threads you don't like?
>>17050810If it works, it works>t. Engineer
>>17050818>Engineerme, I'm a noticer
>>17050792the enitre jeet economy is based on cheap labor and service outsourcing. AI is bearish as fuck for them ehich is why they hate it
>>17050717Oh please do, take me off the mortal coil Tay-sama
>>17050810pol spics do it for free?!
>>17050717>Anthropic marketing team says more than 6,000,000 will die if we don't do a heckin' regulatory captureAI believers are subhuman.
>>17050851>they hate itOK, so what are they doing about it then? Any action beyond just wathing their entire economy sinks ito oblivion?
>>17051052What the fuck can jeets do? Eat a fucking cock and hope firsties pull them out of poverty
>>17051063I don't know, it is an open question from my side.Given the government visions of the future, they should have been able to use AI to their benefits and not be totally sunk by it. So the question is also about the difference between high level visions and reality on the ground.
>>17050794it always cracks me up>what are the chances of X happening, where X is an event that has never occurred yet?>it is exactly 9,56%, no I will not show you the equation
Everyone ITT were also the people saying it would never be able to draw hands or do math. Something smarter than you is dangerous, period, and it's rapidly becoming smarter than you. If you don't think so, your millennium prize money awaits as soon as you beat them to some solutions. I'd work fast though, rumors are circling that they've already figured out 2-3 more despite humans having decades of a head start.
>>17051107>people saying it would never be able to draw hands or do mathThese people never existed. You're suffering from another corporate-induced psychotic episode.
>>17050792>how much are indians being paid to spam this shit accross multiple boards?I think you underestimate the willingness of random people to spam nonsense.>>17051107>Something smarter than you is dangerous, periodIs a calculator smarter because it can do operations we can't? What's a calculator's "IQ"?
>>17051107>it's heckin' dangerous b-b-b-because it's smarter than actual minds capable of actual thinking>>17051157>NOOO it's not heckin' smart!!!!This is what narrative control looks like. The one thing technocrats and their financial handlers don't want you discussing is how dangerous a mindless machine can be in the hands of a certain ethnicity.
>>17050794I always throw around random % chance for anything in my life. But because I think it's funny. Idk about I hecking love basedence clickbait articles.
>>17050794"Decent" can easily mean anything from 5% to 45%, probably even a wider range than that really. It's totally valid to communicate even your vague subjective estimates that are not based on rigorous statistics or anything more precisely than "decent", and if you try to do that without using numbers it easily becomes actually more complicated and tedious than with them. It's not super obvious admittedly in this specific case since "more than 10%" is barely any clearer than "decent".
>>17050851>service outsourcingspamming and shilling is a service, anon. and I bet tokens from LLMs are even more expensive than hordes of indian spammers. they don't even need to understand anything of what they post, they just need to attach an image and get past the captcha.>they hate itwhy do you make shit up?>>17050794that's how you detect bullshit marketing.>>17050810>do you guys always have to resort to "your brown!"funny. I didn't say brown, I said INDIAN. indians are a special class of shit people.>>17051107LLMs "imitate" humans, in that they have to be trained with data to copy.they literally copy shit from stuff created by actual humans. you just need to create an interface and transform it into data and pass it through multiple functions.
>>17050717What? they let the AI make a virus. People have been making them for decades.
>>17051025>You're brown.
>>17051552>funny. I didn't say brown, I said INDIAN. indians are a special class of shit people.yes, we all know you've been trying to shif the crosshairs off the tribe and onto jeets for a couple of years now, I don't think it's working though more and more people are noticing what you're up to in Gaza and the Ukraine and Syria and elsewhere now
>>17051237"10%" can also easily mean anything from 5% to 45% when it's completely made up and just means "would bet against it but wouldn't be surprised"
>>17050717>is AI the great filter? is it the reason we are alone in the Milky Way galaxy?If anything, AI should expand through the universe faster than biological life, unless every civilization wipes itself out with basically what we have now, which is AI that is far better at breaking stuff than building it.
>>17051034
>>17051696If you say 10% when what you actually mean is that "I believe it's close to as likely to happen as not to happen" you're really unusually bad at numbers.
>>17051843agreed so what?
>>17052088"I think there's a 10% chance" is almost never used when the speaker intends to convey they believe the chances are close to 50/50. Meanwhile "decent chance" often is, while also used for much lower probabilities like ~10%.
