this is a credible leaker in AI community btwnote the wording>is being verifiedcould mean they already generated the solution and is preparing it for release
neatI hope there will be mass suicide.
>>17050921Luddites in shambles
>>17050940Why did the word "luddite" emerge for that. Luddites back then were in the right
>>17050958because it's a concession
>>17050973>concessionAccepted.
Retard here, is this actual new math created by GayI or is it just brute forcing existing frameworks (like from the guys in Madrid) with fucktons of compute?
>>17050921who the fuck is thisThis is the 3rd purported "AI solved x" twitter "leak" in the past 2 days, with the first one literally being a faked screenshot (the chinese LK99 tweet that didn't even exist and yet the image kept being shared around and talked about as if real). >this is a credible leaker in AI community btwSource?Who is "leo @synthwavedd"I'm not saying he can't be legit but any discussion about leaks should feature also some information about the leaker's supposed legitimacy.I looked through his Twitter and he seemed to have been talking about some model information in advance of their releases, but I don't know the exact facts or dates to judge any of this reliably.
>>17050975$0.00 have been added to your account, thank you for your continued service.
>>17050999not someone significant but seems to have connections to people inside AI companies, leaked models release dates and various events
>>17050921Right in time for the IPO, and in a year the proofs will be found to have some hallucination in them that invalidates them.
>>17051196thank god
>>17051365Who’s this?
Go back already.
>>17051196>even ai math is kirkified
I hope Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture and Hodge conjecture is true.Otherwise, AI simply just killed the hope in maths.
>>17051225this. more pump and dump marketing for an upcoming cash grab. vc's are realizing how useless ai is and looking for returns on their investment
>>17050999>LK99it still hertz bros. this was the 9/11 of physics
>>17050921>note the wording>is being verified>could mean they already generated the solution and is preparing it for releaseIt could also mean nobody actually checked to see if it was valid before claiming they solved it.>Hey, ChatGPT, what's 1+2?>4>BREAKING NEWS: AI PROVES 1+2=4, MATHEMATICIANS SUPER-NETTLED
mathletes are now saying that these proofs are useless and meaningless, and that what matters is the human process. I always thought the truth had inherent value, which is why abstract mathematics has value. But apparently not
How does any of this affect me personally?>hurr durr dey solved to super DUPER complicated math problemHow does this help me not have to go to work.
>>17052356there's truth in that but you know its mathfag cope because the "human process" matters for literally everything else
OpenAI guy doesn't believe the rumorshttps://x.com/ElliotGlazer/status/2098505701245214927
>>17052362>CockglazerKek this guy is a fucking retard
Well it can't be the Hodge Conjecture because I only told ChatGPT my solution in a private chat (where everything is safe)
The Hobo has a Promising Operator Spectral TripleDerviation of The Alpha ConstantMass RatiosMass Gap Proof
>>17052356A proof no one can replicate isn't a useful proof; the AIfags are effectively asking people to take new mathematics on faith.
>>17052369Totally falsifiable and reproducable.Obviously you didn't even look.Or you're not a engineer, mathetican or physicist. A High School Junior can do the math.
>>17052396>A High School Junior can do the math.>Yet no one did it for decades.
330 years to be exact>>17052409
