Record ice sheet gain caused by, you guessed it, blogal worming.Oh my soience!
>>17051099At this point, even if you're a good soience-minded normalgolem who still believes in AGW, how can you be confident AGW is bad? How many unpredictable and counterintuitive events can they attribute to AGW before they're forced to admit they have no idea what's going on and they're just dumb boomer conservatives afraid of change? Climate doomsayers are just spiritual republicans opposing climate progress.
I want to know what other /sci/ anons think. Do you think OP is:a. a crazy personb. or a trollc. or propaganda bot farmd. or someone who hates /sci/e. or an AI LLM bot?
>>17051101/thread
>>17051104False pentachotomyIt could be the case that OP is a cock sucking faggot. This turns out to be the result. The proof is left to the reader.
>>17051104Or someone, who, perhaps even if lacking in a deep understanding of climate science, has noticed a pattern where no matter what weather and climate are observed, they're held up as proof of one particular conclusion.
>>17051512That's what OP is doing yes. Instead of using all the data he has formed a conclusion and then cherry picked dates that showed his preferred point of view. He even manages to mock the actual mechanic that explains his own numbers as if warm oceans do not somehow cause heavy rains or snowfalls in this case. Antarctica is losing ice mass and yet warm oceans can cause heavy snowfall on the otherwise dry continent. This is called "weather" and is quite normal. The type example of this behavior is finding spots or periods where it's particularly cold even though on the whole the year is once again in top X of hottest years ever as if that means anything.
>>17051529You still haven't realized global warming was a pretext for climate refugees? lmao. What a retard.
