>the first version of the OpenAI Navier Stokes solution only has 16 references>the current version has 22>OpenAI denies they changed the paperhmmmmmmmmm
old versionhttps://web.archive.org/web/20260908172948/https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdfnew versionhttps://cdn.openai.com/pdf/32d9f210-8b73-45e0-91bc-82a30aef8a9a/navier-stokes.pdf
>>17051433Who cares? AI did all the work.
>>17051446that's what they tried to claim with the first paper, but I guess the people in the other 8 references did stuff tooAIbros, it's over..... humanity won again
>>17051436Use archive.today because OpenAI may send a request to delete it from archive org
>>17051433Because they are lying.
>goys we're a trillion dollar company invest pls