>>17051492
He’s right

>>17051496
it's already proven wrong. AI solved all those problems the headline is talking about. They deleted that article from the archives kek

>>17051492
Roses are red, violets are blue
AI will replace STEM jobs too

>>17051492
Why do they still use that picture of Terry? He doesn't look like that anynore.

>>17051530
Who cares, he's an ugly chink.

>>17051492
Ropefuel

>kid trooned out
>replaced by a chatbot
>mathematics trivialized to mind numbing prompting
>wrong about everything

>>17051492
I'm not mathematician, but I think they would have resisted if they weren't "proven" to be false through bruteforce, work stolen from other researchers or whatever counterexample was found by the LLM assistants. am I wrong?
has any of the solutions found by LLMs ever been anything other than a counterexample?

>>17053063
>This level of cope and moving the goal post
I bet you think you are smart ( you are not)

>>17053223
>>This level of cope and moving the goal post
elaborate.
aren't counterexamples easier to prove, though maybe more difficult to find?
where did I move the goal post?

>>17053063
the headline talks about frontier math problems
>I'm not mathematician, but I think they would have resisted if they weren't "proven" to be false through bruteforce, work stolen from other researchers or whatever counterexample was found by the LLM assistants. am I wrong?
yes, you are. This is very silly cope. I bet you're one of those guys who thought AI is like NFT or it's just "brute force" or "just matrix multiplication" or "glorified autocomplete" and you can't let it go. Accept that you were wrong and move on. Otherwise you will look like an increasingly bigger retard with eash passing month

>>17053443
I see you didn't provide an example. And openai admitted on their last controversial "proof" that they did in fact brute force with thousands upon thousands of agents. And they can't even be sure they weren't searching user data lmao.

>>17053447
this thread isn't even about navier stokes, chuddie murphy

>>17053443
I don't need to be a mathematician to understand how LLMs work, or how to prove basic math problems.
do you know how training works? I bet you are one of those retards who think LLMs can innovate.

>Otherwise you will look like an increasingly bigger retard with eash passing month
training LLMs with more and more data and using more and more processing power for inference won't make them do something they just can't do.

>>17053447
>more cope

>>17053450
this is just embarrassing and pathetic

>>17053453
great argument
are you a CS student perchance? or an actual shill bot?

>>17053458
remind yourself of this thread month from now and then month after that

>>17053460
once again, zero argument to my points
congratulations on being retarded and thinking you are smart, mr. jew shill bot

>>17053464
Don't be Antisemitic

>>17053464
what fucking points, chuddie? Your views of AI are outdated by over 10 years. Even my over 60 parents are more up to speed with the topic.I think you may legitimately have a brain damage or something

>>17051492
Embarrassing

>>17051492
KWAB

Mathematicians don't want sloppy AI seconds.

>>17051496
Yeah he's right, which is why he and the other field's medalists are having an existential crisis. KYS ramesh

>>17051498
He was right with the unsaid add-on
>these will resist AI assuming the theorems are true
It would be like saying
>The Goldbach conjecture will resist computers for several years
But then someone finds a large even number that isn't the sum of two primes by brute force search
It doesn't disprove the statement, we were just wrong about the theorem being true

File: whats-youre-favorite-home(...).jpg (160 KB, 1688x1289)

160 KB JPG

>>17058101
They can go be homeless.
Math waits for no one.

File: Screenshot From 2026-09-2(...).png (78 KB, 951x638)

78 KB PNG

Bros...

>>17059015
Apple made nothing but losses on its vision of "computers made for normies". Now look at it.

>>17059015
Fake graphic, Amazon ceased to exist in 2005 when they 'lost' tens of billions that they were spending on warehouses.

>>17059015
>still stuck circa May-June
maybe he should ask an AI to keep his shit up to date

>>17059047
Amazon sold crap at a loss as an anti-competitive measure, the products they sell exist because they sell at a profit.
>>17059044
>nothing but losses
So, from when to when did Apple report a negative FCF?

>>17059097
>June
almost as if that is how financial quarters work. The next one is gonna end with this month.
>AI shitposting gets more and more fervent as Q3 reports loom over them like a sword of damocles

>>17059015
>"ai is making monnys!1!"
>look into it
>only companies making money are the ones making hardware for ai
selling pans in a gold rush

>>17059214
stfu

File: 1_uv52FpS-EvCeA7KuegljtA-(...).jpg (60 KB, 1113x1077)

60 KB JPG

>>17061159
Truth hurts doesn't it?

>>17059047
>they 'lost' tens of billions that they were spending on warehouses.
this is a retarded argument. warehouses are built once and used for decades. datacenters? maybe, but the equipment running inside has to be reconfigured/rebuilt from time to time. servers and GPUs? they are to be replaced every couple of years, maybe every 5 years at most.

Money is not important.

>>17067106
Please tell that to the AI investors so the bubble bursts quicker

>>17051509
AI hasn't really replaced any jobs, companies that have tried have gotten fucked hard by the reality that AI fucking sucks.

>>17053443
>a-and you can't let it go
no, you can't prove otherwise, you're still seething about it today.

i'm sorry your autocomplete sucks and people can see it.

>>17053452
>>17053453
watching you stammer out nothing responses when confronted with the reality of AIslop is very embarrassing and pathetic, yes.

>>17054774
>a-are outdated
you have failed to actually show how they are outdated in every single one of your spam threads, lol.
AI is shitty autocomplete that work people have already done, navier-stokes was just another example of this, you have no argument against this.

>>17067194
*that steals work people have already done

File: file.png (1.25 MB, 1920x1080)

1.25 MB PNG

>AI will replace basedentists
>[mass media] told me so
>math is solved
>[mass media] told me so
and of course
>I don't follow mass media, I get my news from [astroturfers and bot accounts on twitter (also mass media)]

Has Mochizuki's proof of ABC been verified in LEAN?

Why is this list not empty? Could AI update Wiki?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_mathematics

And I have another question: if AI is going to replace young people what is going to happen to the not-so-young people?

Is AI going to replace the immigrants too?

>>17064936
The equipment inside the datacenter is usually somewhere in the ballpark of 40% of the datacenter's cost, so it remains cost-effective to upgrade the datacenter with new hardware for many years to come.

File: dgost22-2585e185-bb52-4b0(...).png (1.82 MB, 1024x1024)

1.82 MB PNG

>>17067221
>LEAN

>>17064936
>servers and GPUs? they are to be replaced every couple of years, maybe every 5 years at most.
so shitty those GPUs can only do compute, they're not compatible with directx and shit. what a waste