I missed the Navier-Stokes proof news for 2 days. Is it being underreported or am I just a bum?
>>17051531underreported
Underreported because journos know they are fucked because of AI. Journos always do AI doomer stories.
>>17051531Normies don't care that something they've never heard of and has no immediate practical application got solved. They just hear it as "computers solved another hard math problem again like last week"
>>17051562They're right. It's not actually any more impressive than the last batch.
>>17051531when i woke up the morning of the news, i was scrolling news on my phone and the navier-stokes announcement was like a few pages down. And this is when my algorithm has math and science related articles weighted heavily. Had i clicked on one of the "top" news articles i would have missed it entirely. I was stunned at first when i read it, i thought it must be a joke or something at first. It's the biggest news in mathematics in decades, perhaps ever given the context.
it's being suppressed in tightly controlled media for surer/math didn't have any mention of it, even in the commentscnn ran a small text no-picture headline on the second page one day laterall reporting is strictly focused on the stolen proof narrative. perhaps this is the reason the journalist are afraid to report on it. they want to gauge the approved response. they have no opinion of their own
>>17051634So the conclusion is they want see people AI as less then it is, this is a very important conclusion.
>>17051634>suppressedI "suppress" shill garbage too, with the power of regexop:only;boards:sci;/\b([Oo]pen)?AG?I\b/op:only;boards:sci;/\b(chat)?GPT\b/i
>>17051531Nobody cares