It's strange seeing all of these threads popping up after the claims of AI-solved Millennium Prize Problems. A lot of /sci/ is suddenly talking about >"mathoids" and >"mathees" and >"put the fries in the bag" and so on...However, I am starting to suspect that it's not predominantly trolls, but instead the army of Calc1 dropouts have now seen their chance to get back at the people who make them look like worthless retards and hopeless larpers for all these years. I will make a follow up thread next year when the prizes are announced, and it's revealed that the AI corpos lied to boost their stocks. See you all then in the thread where we can put these losers back in their place. Let them be cocky with their $5 generated theorems for now. Requiem for these dilators awaits.
inb4 the 13 year olds start spamming their luddite meme cope
Plus a fine mixture of post that are half midwits being like "what is navier-stokes pwease tell me" and the other half larpers crying about their careers being over (there was no career).
>>17053687>instead the army of Calc1 dropouts have now seen their chance to get back at the people who make them look like worthless retardsbecause that is the case lol
>>17054032/thread
>>17053687OP, you should know that many retards will not like this post.
>>17053687not much point in getting too flustered by this. it's not like the spammers are gonna be able to remove people's tenures.
>>17053687Physics prof here. I contribute to those posts. Keep seething mathtard. Your time is up
>>17054067Tenure is the next to go. By 2100 it won't exist anymore. Universities are actively cutting tenure lines and rightfully so. It's never been as right as it is with mathematicians. What's controversial about math? Lol.
>>17054144>Physics profYou know you're gonna have to work at a grocery store before the mathematicians ever do, don't you anon.?
>>17054146New tenure, more specifically, is definitely something that everybody is gonna lose.
>>17053687Nice Cope OP. Keep telling yourself AI can't do "real math">>17054144>he thinks he is saveHa
>>17054385Such a big AI boy aren't you,keep destroying those stinky luddites : 3
AI confabulation improvement https://github.com/botspamtroll/Psychic-lego
>>17054324Surely the AI bootlickers will be safe?
>>17054608Denying proof because it came from a machine is peak luddite, you scream low IQ
>>17055932Such a big high-IQ boy : )
>>17055932Artisanal, locally made, bespoke hand crafted proof is so much better than cheap factory made shit though. You can see the love that went into the craft.
If we average across all the wrong proofs in existence, the errors will zero out and we will be left with the correct proof.
>>17055941The cost of artisanal proofs is outrageous. I need an endless supply of cheap proofs to make a profit.
>>17055932well, it didn't come from a machine, the machine actually just stole the work some dude already did on the internet.
>>17055946This angle always makes me kek. Yeah, sure, it can't think for itself. Keep saying that to yourself if it helps you sleep. There's no magic to thought, just a mechanical process that can be followed. The machine can possibly think, or you can't.
>>17055936I mean, yeah
>>17055950We got another big strong high-IQ AI-chad : )
>Denying proof because it came from a machine is peak luddite, you scream low IQWhy are all AI believers mentally ill?
>>17055959It's a coping mechanism for the calc1 dropouts as was mentioned by OP. They talk about proofs they don't even know how to verify themselves as they've never gone past a GED, and then dilate and shit themselves over how "luddites" are low IQ.
>>17055967>calc1 dropoutsI doubt these receding-jawed spiteful mutants even finished high-school. But who's "denying proof because it came from a machine"? He's just plainly hallucinating this.
>>17055976Yeah. Mathematicians have always used computational methods for research purposes, but that has nothing to do with OP's post topic; He's just trooning out.
>>17053687Seeing that one obvious arts major thread another group of people in the mix are clearly /his/faggot taxi drivers. There's nothing wrong with arts and humanities per se but a lot of the people practicing it are really bitter about science
>>17056453Them being bitter is an issue of them not being able to come to terms with their path in life. If you choose a path, you should understand your general place in the broader order of human knowledge, and whether it makes you content. The based art and humanities individuals are the one's who don't have such an unstable view, as they are simply living as who they chose to be.
>>17053687how are weird asocial perelman types offensive to anyone other than those with too much time on their hands
>>17056690Perelman is a literal SCP so I'm unsure if he's a good example. OP is right that it's mostly just people who were too lazy to study math or science that are being opportunistic at the moment.
>>17055946retard
>>17056790NTA, btfo.
>>17055976They are perpetually horrified by own their sub-sapient minds.
>>17057258Describes a shitton of /sci/ honestly. Now we even have the retards who can't distinguish entry level math from AI so now we also have the converse of the problem OP describes where they cope with>[has to understand the quadratic formula to make sense of an argument]>t-that's AI! Surely! Not reading that, I win!in general it seems these people are obsessed with "winning" arguments
>>17053687Cool it with the antisemi->he thinks it happens all across multiple sites with the exact same pattern organicallyNever mind, good goy
>>17058246I mean it's really telling how a lot of these "people" follow a lot of other patterns when probed (for example being pro status quo while trying to keep a "fresh" and "contrarian" cadence) so you are def onto something
>>17058246OP was being derisive as a goal it seems. I doubt he was literally claiming one sole pattern across multiple sites.
https://isaiprofitable.com/>expected date for Q3 reports: Oct. 28TICK TOCK AI FAGGOTS
>>17059120>what is capexInference is profitable. You really thought the “evil greedy psychopath CEO’s” are just burning money for the fun of it?https://newsletter.semianalysis.com/p/vera-rubin-nvl72-agentic-inference?_gl=1*1jf3zga*_ga*NDg2MDczMjYuMTc4ODMwMzQzNg..*_ga_FKWNM9FBZ3*czE3OTAwOTA3NTUkbzQkZzAkdDE3OTAwOTA3NTYkajYwJGwwJGg2MDMzNDg5Nzc.*_gcl_au*MTUwMTk4NzgwNC4xNzg4MDU5NzI5
>>17059127Buy an ad- oh wait you did
>>17059129>maybe everyone will forget the topic if I use this trick!You are NOT smarter and more knowledgeable than all the big tech CEO’s and their investors. Profit is guaranteed to whoever owns the data centers.
>>17059133Is the profit in the room with us right now?Is it in the earnings report?Or is it only predictions and empty promises for another 6 years?>but but but my paid shill think piece on some literal who website>>smarter than a CEOa CEO is an overpaid fall guy for the board of directors. Somewhere between a tick and a scapegoat. >investors are infallibleThey didn't have internet in India back in '08, I can't blame you.October 30 we will probably be by >$2T spent and $300B total revenue. AIFATIGUE is looking very bullish.
>>17059142I just posted a link showing that inference is profitable on the scale of $100B+ per year with Vera Rubin chips. Your misunderstanding of capex vs. opex and emphasis on the present moment is nigger economics. Look up how long uber and amazon were unprofitable and get back to me.
>>17059149>more nigger babble> inference is profitable on the scale of $100B+ per year with Vera Rubin chips.according to cum guzzling pickaxe dealers who are always the ones to rake it in during a gold rish?> capex vs opexthat is just the "ACKSHUALLY we're investing bigly in infrastructure" line they have been parroting for years.> emphasis on the present moment 6 years you foreskin liquidated child molester. How many more years does it take?
>>17059153> How many more years does it take?given that inference is already profitable… the AI companies will likely recover their losses after they stop training at the same scale so far, which would happen if the capabilities plateau. Uber ran at a loss for 11 years, does it shock your nigger brain that they are now doing well? Do you know when Amazon was founded? And when they became a top company? Do you actually think that AI won’t be generating hundreds of billions in revenue by 2040?
>>17059161not even "two more years bro" but "14 more years bro", you """"people"""" are beyond parody. >billions saar invest nowlol, the entire muttoid economy is by now a human centipede of middle men who promise shit like that>amazon and Uberused its years and years of operating at a loss to strong arm its way into a de facto monopoly position (something that isn't even legal in some countries, one of the reasons Wallshart failed across the pond), it's a common mutt tactic. It (and Uber) made their money back by siphoning off revenue streams that were already there (putting themselves as a layer between goyslop vendor and goy, in the case of Uber) and then slowly ramping up their service fees. There is no existing market to parasitize for AI.
>>17059175This is the sort of cope you have to resort to when you spent years saying “it will never be able to do x” and then it did.
>>17059180>defeated ramblingstick tock, parasite. I hope you at least get paid for your religious fervor
>>17059149>$1000T^2+!!!
Damn this thread is devolving...
>>17059384Model collapse. Trained on nothing but frogposts.
>>17059438Yeah seriously what the fuck is with the frogpost spam these past few days..
>>17059384I don't know it has a consistent theme of mocking shills
