stringking42069 predicted that Sabrina (“The Next Einstein” à la 2019) is going to write a few more useless throwaway papers, and then inevitably sell out to AI within a year since her entire ouvre has been vaporware. I tend to agree; she was a fake from the start. She is still hanging on with some outrageously good positions she is under qualified for; but for how long though ?Let’s predict her future.
>>17053723sucking dicks to feed herself.
>>17053723Literally fucking who? I have never even heard of this chick.
>>17053723I couldn't even read this OP because it makes my physically sick. Some kind of AI slop. I am actually going to vomit though. Maybe it's just tine wine. If anyone is watching, OK I'm ready for my new job. Or whatever.
>>17053723She looks like the real deal but tragically she has been sucked into high energy physics, a field where papers are produced and science is not advanced. Too many bright people have met this fate.>>17053744Clearly, you are new around herehttps://warosu.org/sci/?task=search2&ghost=false&search_text=&search_subject=Sabrina&search_username=&search_tripcode=&search_email=&search_filename=&search_datefrom=&search_dateto=&search_media_hash=&search_op=all&search_del=dontcare&search_int=dontcare&search_ord=new&search_capcode=all&search_res=post
>>17054101She was never the real deal, anon. She was a self-promoter and a my-dad-promoted-me-nepobaby from the start. Even from the beginning she admitted she was rejected from Harvard undergrad and only got into MIT undergrad thanks to her shilling her airplane kit stunt, and she falsified her way into MIt physics by claiming she was going to be an aeronautical engineer she was never all that clever and even when she wrote her papers that Stephen Hawking cited, she said in retrospect that she knew nothing about string theory or holography at the time but was just basing her paper on what she knew about undergrad E&M.Mix that in with the fact that Andy Strominger was notoriously enamored with semi-attractive female grad students (and still is but maybe a bit less horny now that he’s on death’s door now thanks to his youthful living on communes smoking weed and doing LSD for most of the 70s before volunteering to be a worker in communist china factories until his Harvard professor Dad got him back in at Harvard through the nepobaby path) and you have the explanation for why “Harvard” promoted her so hard
>>17054367This basically>>17053723It was all fraud and self promotion. Basically money grab. I watched an interview of her and she was always just vaguely talking and could not answer clearly what she was doing. I know enough about crypto and crypto scammers, this basically always means that there is nothing real. People will tell themselves "oh it must be soooo complicated" but that's just the classic midwit trap. She is not dumb but there is nothing real she is doing very likely.
>>17054378>I watched an interview of her and she was always just vaguely talking and could not answer clearly what she was doing. it’s worse than that. Sabrina does a few tactics that really reveal what a fraud she is. 1) She never answers in the context of the the question that was asked; she shifts to some other weird analogy that confuses and obscures the original question; 2) she talks really REALLY fast in a way that makes California valley girls look like they’re on shrooms. this tactic of talking super fast is a classic con-artist tactic and serves to cut off thought and the possibility of dialogue, and it is purposeful; 3) she very often makes claims to “Well I don’t know about X,Y,Z” for things where X,Y,Z include advanced math, experimental physics, computation, and uses that to somehow sequester her own artisanal skills as something apart from everything else, when in reality any real expert should and must know at least a strong base in those things in order to be an expert of high energy physics. she does this as a rhetorical trick to make her interlocutors feel like her knowledge is completely isolated from the rest of the intellectual environment of HEP-TH, when in fact she must know at least a good working understanding of all those things or else she is just completely a faker (and maybe the latter is actually true)
>>17054367Yes and after all these years of hype, eventually here we are and she is no more the next Einstein than I am.She is very fucking hot tho, gotta admit that... also, looks oddly enough like Caroline Ellison, the chick from FTX, except 100x hotter, especially in this vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Va3Fp7A67TM
Why does she look like a female version of Asmongold?
>>17054879I see it. I also get a Wednesday Addams feel
>>17054384Very good points, the fast talking was not striking me as characteristic of scammers so far.If it interests you, this jewish crypto scammer was what i was referring to, he released some useless trash "product" but had to sell it as the next revolution.https://youtu.be/ugF9kZW2pGw?si=rl6XoCBmhde3ZKnF&t=220You can start at the timestamp and just analyse how insecure he is to not talk anything wrong that can be used against him or that shows that there is no substance. I think he is a perfect study object how scammers talk he has many more of these interviews. He managed to convince many people that he was some kind of genius developer. He walked away with 100 million btw while the token went to 0...
>>17054392>Caroline is hot
>>17054384https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=EunS6JEAAAAJ&hl=enShe has an h-index of 28 lol. She is obviously not the next einstein or whatever retarded shit the media says but she is not a grifter.
>>17055751>last paper from early 2023 with 20 pages and a jeet coauthorYeah strong grifter vibes
>>17056141Ók nvm im retarded she still makes papers.
