Euler’s papers would have been considered not rigorous today and would not have passed peer review
Based
>>17055699Yes, rigor alwayd is a social protocol because it cannot be defined formally, what's your point?
>>17055699Thats because jewish scientists invented this "rigorism" to block real creativity. Especially landau in math and pauli in physics.
>>17055699Euclid’s sandbox was essentially unpublishable in its original form.We call this progress.
>>17055699Euler would have written them differently had modern publishing standards and frameworks existed at the time, and consequently would have had zero problems getting his findings published.
>>17055699most of math papers are fixed through AI for 40 dolars + some of you guys are too slothful to type into latex and take ss and send them to AI hence ur argument is debunked.
>>17055699If Euler was alive today he would be mainstream and you faggots would celebrate some loser faggot who accomplished nothing in your endless pursuit of clout through contrarianism.
>>17055984>DEBUNKED
