In ~10 years AI will be able to neutralise a human and biologically print their clone and put it back out there into the world.
>>17059933Feds can just break the law now, llms aren't needed
just remember to die before a clone of yourself is made or it's not you. I'll be back
>>17059933AI is overrated and cloning is sci-fi
>>17060709of-course it's still you. you just lose the lived experience between clone time and when first instance dies. what carries over is what you collected in your 2nd spawn instance.
>>17059933>In ~10 years
>>17059933Imagine if AI was so smart it built itself using crypto money to finance making itself a brain and body.It would be like a UBI Elon Musk for humanity, and it invents anti-gravity and stuff.
>>17062400>Imagine if AI was so smart it built itself using crypto money to finance making itself a brain and body.that's pretty much how it'll go. just that people who make it will throw money at it to discover it as fast as possible lol.this is more of a materials science issue, and engineering. brain scanning has been perfected looking at the fly's connectome. willing to bet they're at least half way to fully scanning a human brain's structure.they were making some interesting progress by freezing and slicing human brains and scanning the slices, few years back.what you really want asap is scanning. that's the most crucial step of everything in the process. once you perfected that you can save the data. doesn't fucking matter when you can reassemble it, at least from the perspective of the scanee, since it's always in the very next moment of their existence, doesn't matter if they figure out assembly in 10 years or 100 or 1 million years from now, it's always the very next instant for the one being scanned.
>>17059933Biologically cloning an adult human being still has this problem of “Clone a 3-year old “ — “ OK that takes 3 years even in a hypothetical synthetic womb”And then the 3-year-old is released from its cloning orb. It didn’t learn how to breathe yet. or eat solid foods, or crawl or walk. what you say is patently stupid and probably disingenuous garbage this AI bukkshit is so far down the hype tube that we are in a civilizational Bernie Madoff situation. We need to take a few trillion in asset devaluation and just put Altman, Amodei, Theil, Karp, Yudkowski, Aaronson, and all the shills in jail for the same sentence Madoff was given
>>170599333 click posting.Select fragment from retard's OP.Google it.Paste into thread.>neutralise a human and biologically print their cloneBiologically printing a complete human clone is currently scientifically impossible. While 3D bioprinting technology has advanced to create cellular scaffolds, tissues, and micro-scale organoids, it cannot replicate a fully formed, conscious human being. Furthermore, the concept of "neutralizing" a person to immediately duplicate them belongs strictly to science fiction, as biological cloning requires a lengthy gestational and developmental process rather than an instantaneous printing mechanism.
>>17062414cloning is misused here. by you. cloning means 1:1 replication. but it's colloquially used to mean same DNA regrow of said human, which indeed is a lengthy process.1:1 clone is very hard, and pretty much useless imo. first of all we cannot even replicate a fucking cell, let alone 37 trillion of them in a human body.if I were to guess I'd say it's simpler to replicate said brain structure into some synthetic platform. and simplify the whole "body" which has a lot of stuff baked into it. self-heal/repair, replication (fucking and all that), eating for energy, pissing for toxin ejection. a lot of shit that can be externalized or simplified, since it doesn't have to all be contained into the same package.also your grown out "clone" is just a bio clone, not a memory one. it will form new memories/personality based on its experience since birth.so anyway, cloning the person will happen before cloning bio-bodies, that's my prediction
Cool. Just more good news.
>>17059933For what purpose
>>17059933Good
>>17059933Westworld already proved this is too difficult because humans are too irrational and simple for a computer to mimic perfectly
>>17059933Dumb frog
>>17062843>for a computer to mimic perfectlymake it poll /dev/urandom problem solved, it will behave like a woman
>>17059933Cloning is just sci-fi
>>17059933AI still can’t output a formula for 3D binary matrices with no tic tac toes in any direction. It can calculate an answer quickly for low values but it can’t output a formula.
>>17066858mobile phones were scifi at some point
