This is the first orbital launch and simultaneously the first non-test launch that actually deploys payload, which in this case is V3 Starlink satellites.https://www.spacex.com/launches/starship-flight-14https://x.com/SpaceX/status/2104354931595423762>Starship’s 14th flight is set to launch on Monday, Sept 28. The 75-minute launch window opens at 7:15 a.m. CT. Live coverage of the mission starts ~35 minutes before launchOfficial Stream https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1qxvvenMPMQxBNSF https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gDxG-pm1ZoEveryday Astronauthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeKY53pwArwLaunchPadhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MareN0ZSZEkAvid Spacehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60LXNdoIXvo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhJRzQsLZGgno commentary stream from NSF
Praying for kino RUD on the launchpad
>decent time for EuropeWTF, I love Elon now.
Trips and it explodes after reaching orbit.
https://x.com/SpaceX/status/2104518426270064769launch happening 30min later
All boards, I need a GO/NOGO status check.
>launch is at 7:45amJust enough time for me to brew my coffee. Comfy launch guaranteed.
2h until launch
>>17062566All boards report dead sir.
>>17062563getting real tired of this shit I NEED TO SLEEP
>>17062566/pol/ reporting in, status is GO for London crash-land
>>17062566/trash/ here, all systems nominal, GO.do you guys have any more anthropomorphic starship Art btw?
pol here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axB9GpOP5_4
1h 45min until launch
>>17062503Let's GOOOOO
>>17062589>Let's GOOOOO
k, keep me posted
>>17062566/vg/ reports we are go, flight
>>17062585No but I have this Saturn V
>>17062578get ready for a scrub
>>17062592>>17062597>>17062595get to ze cyber camps
>>17062566/ck/ is GO flight
>>17062600I look like this and I say this
>>17062600
>>17062566/vr/ here we're good to go
>>17062603>>17062604Let's do this!
>>17062608is that the woman that posted her vagina online for no reason after getting a small following through her art?
>>17062609i saw it unfortunately
>>17062609>>17062608I seen it on the internet
>>17062566/r9k/ ready to blast off in mom
>>17062566/hm/ reporting in
>>17062609Seen't
>>17062617is that natty?!
>>17062616nice
>>17062614Matt Walsh is a dumb faggot but sometimes he says something right
>>17062614Dome, and above it, the waters of heaven
>>17062566/x/ NOT go. You can't go orbital because earth is flat.
>>17062614you're saying you seent it?
>>17062614>implying it's an actual position and not a glownigger psyop to portray anyone who disagrees with the government as a schizo
>>17062503>V3 Starlink satellites.Slava Ukraini!too bad they'll just get incapacitated by rassvet )
>>17062630this, the govt has been signal boosting groups of retards in order to create chaff and permanently destroy the meaning of the word "conspiracy".it's much easier to get away with doing evil shady shit when people will just be shunned for being "one of those conspiracy theorists" if they speak up about it. many people who knew about the epstein stuff long before it came to public consciousness likely never spoke up because they would simply be seen as just another flat earther type freak retard, without very extensive proof as receipts it's hard not to.
>less than an hour to goHYPE
ITS OVER
Let's say it can't do a deorbit burn, how long until it will do re-entry?
SCRUB INCOMING
>>17062566/o/ reporting in
>>17062645yes please, and i'm taking a picture of it before and after so you better not do any extra fucking work on it i didn't ask for bitch.
Holy fuck, I didn't realize that the launch wasn't at the usual time. I'm still at work.
>>17062642two weeks
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
...And scrubbed...
>Go for propellant load. Teams will soon begin loading Starship with ~12 million pounds of liquid oxygen and liquid methane. Targeting launch for 7:48 a.m. CT
it was just delayed by 3min, not scrubbed
>>17062652>>17062650wrong
>>17062653https://x.com/SpaceX/status/2104540122448548229
Who wants it to fail?
>>17062658>still pending FAA approval
starts in 10 minshttps://x.com/i/broadcasts/1qxvvenMPMQxB
>>17062661Jeff
I am going to watch another episode of the fairly oddparents.
>>17062600Cyber Camp?Nein bruder a CYBER KAMPFhttps://altcensored.com/watch?v=9pbkn_DuGd0
>>17062667See you, have fun.
>>17062646
>>17062667DINKLEBERG
My retirement is literally riding on this launch before market open.
>>17062673more business for your competitor on the other side of town then, too bad.dont you just love the free market?
>>17062675can't belive stock is so high still, i figured they start dumping about now. how long till vested can sell?
>>17062665>9:10pmhello fellow jp bro
>>17062666>Jeff made his employees do this on launch dayElon would never
>>17062679Most already can except Elon. It just follows the overall trend of the AI stocks for now.
>>17062682>that webmI would literally walk out, both as an employee and a customer the cringe level would kill me
>>17062592I like when Yrliet calls me "elantach">purge the alien! (except for my xenogf)
>>17062682
>/ourguy/ thunderf00t isn't streaming it todayAny stream actually worth watching that gives fair and balanced views on starship?
>>17062689>fair and balancedebic
>>17062689thunderf00t isn't /ourguy/ and also doesn't give fair and balanced views on starship, your post is invalid.
Where here!!!!!
stream live
>>17062661yuros
>>17062693
>>17062690>>17062691Well who do we watch? I lurk sci but mostly post on /g/
>>17062693https://prod-fastly-us-east-1.video.pscp.tv/Transcoding/v1/hls/_zxlh6MaKtTna8pdpVS5s73Yi-Kvj2-bCA3hPgl2SKmZ9K3XdEjOEDWMhhMumWMoL21I2hYFJykdhHejdcUQaQ/non_transcode/us-east-1/periscope-replay-direct-prod-us-east-1-public/master_dynamic_delta.m3u8?type=live jah
the year is 2026 and stream has not started yet. it says Starting Soon
>>17062697watch the official stream you fucking retardhttps://x.com/i/broadcasts/1qxvvenMPMQxB
>>17062700he's /g/ go easy on him, spacex would never use rust btw
>>17062699you need to reload
No Starship catch? I thought they were catching the ship this time.
720p wtf is going on
>>17062700I don't want rando talking heads I want someone with a proven degree, and some actual street knowledge.also x sucks
>>17062707mine is 4k on firefox
>>17062706FAA got cold feet is the official narrative.
>>17062689Clear
>>17062711i read they were worried about spreading debris on civilians
Is your wife go for launch, Anon?
>>17062716mommy is ready
>>17062566/vt/ is GO
>>17062679november has a big unlock
spey sex
Stream is up https://www.youtube.com/live/bUj5OY5APd0
>>17062566/vg//alg/ is GO
>>17062725
>>17062709they are the engineers working on the ship
Rocket Idol Vtuber Usui Kuria desu~https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUj5OY5APd0
9m is too small...
>>17062715>but what about the civilianscan't beat the chinese like this
>>17062730now imagine how much smaller most other rockets are
>>1706273018m version will come out by 2040. Trust.
>>17062729>She has captions turned offIs this because of the "I came" thing?
looksmatched couple spotted
>clear speaks 12 seconds>three lines of moon runes>"OK, lets see if-"
>>17062732the reentry today will be twice as fast as previous flights thus, the danger of RUD is multiplied
>>17062741It will be interesting to see if the tiles get affected after spending a few hours in LEO.
"starship doesn't have the deltav to go to orbit" fags, how do you feel?
>>17062743Didn't seem to affect shittle missions much
inb4 sticky
>>17062725when did clear get auto translated live captions
>spacex has RP-1 energydrinksam jealous.
>Launch goes flawlessly>pez door gets stuck again
>They are drinking Monster energy ultraHoly goated!
>>17062747
>(((starlink)))
>>17062754>not stickyMOOOODS
>>17062749clear wants world domination
26Tb of capacity in one flight. And it's gonna be one flight an hour.We're going to be watching porn in resolutions so high that your eyes turn inside out.
>>17062722i might buy in after the big unlock
>>17062758Still not enough to stream 10K VR porn uncompressed
@grok is this real?
it seems one of us is on the premise
>>17062758>And it's gonna be one flight an hour.that cant be right. launches from louisiana alone are 30 a day. starship is going to be like 10 flights an hour if we include all launch sites.
>>17062755>(((muslims)))
ordnung muss sein
The only thing that matters today is super heavy not getting CLOGGED for the nth time in a row so it can be caught for flight 15
POSTING IN A STICKY
>Trying to appeal to kaigai nikkiBefore I die I want to see Clear and Scott Manley do a collab
Posting in a sticky!!!
>>17062770
>>17062758I have not masturbated to 3dpd porn in over a decade
Elon's martian phentotype
1000's of Starships a year to Mars. they haven't even built 100 Falcon 9 rockets.these must all be 1000 individual starships since they will be gone and not reused for years
why does he look like that
Pretty bold move to launch this right ahead of market open.
7 min
How to get this build?
Finally going to try for orbit? Thunderf00t on suicide watch
Six minutes to go
Rawket launch? Downright peculiar
>>17062779Take steroids and skip the gym
QRD on difference in the mission this time?
>>17062779
>>17062786They will (try and fail) to put it in orbit for a few hours and dump a bunch of starlinks
Who is up for some fishing?
>>17062786Going to attempt to get to orbit and launch the first permanent starlink sats from Starship
3 MINUITES
>maximize button doesn't exist>can only get permission to view tweet via spacex launch page>xcancel shut downWow, great website
>>17062786Orbital flightReal Starlink satellites
>>17062779Offer your life and works to a heavenly body, you will get rewarded with a new flesh and dreams
I pray for a successful flight.
>>17062792what is mpv you savage
>>17062779Is Louisiana cold?
Dubs and all goes well and we all get futa gf
LET'S FUCKING GOhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuracCo01V0
you losers can start jerking your cocks now. if you do it now at T-2min you will come at takeoff
>>17062788>a few hoursuh, if they fail to enter orbit it's not going to be hours bud
>>17062797It's a swamp
>>17062788why would they fail that? you seriously think they couldn't put it into orbit previously? they have done the on-orbit raptor relight a bunch of times now, the only difference is that now it will increase orbital speed instead of decreasing it
God be with you /sfg/
>>17062803Delusional Eboxtard, Starship is a scam
HODL
IT'S HAPPENING
why is T-60 the new T-40
>>17062808inflation is rampant
IT'S GONNA FLY :DDD
GAAN
GO GO GO
>not even a million viewsIt's over
IT WENT UP ANON!!
Good morning saars
HOLY SHIT
>no holdsvery unexpected. this launch is looking extremely promising.
wow, there it goes
muskular rockets going to Mars
>>17062813starship is routine
.....the fuck you mean we just had a flawless launch with no hold?
WE'RE SO FUCKING BACK
32 fuck
ENGINE OUT
>ENGINE LOSTENGINE LOST>ENGINE LOST
>>17062803Absolute state of raptors
why are their boosters still randomly giving out? shouldn't they have fixed this by now?
>>17062820two more launches coming within 5 weeks
When will raptors stop shitting the bed?
>lost an enginewelp it's over we just wasted so many tax payer dollers that could have gone for healthcare for all
>engine lostThunderf00t won
Its over...
>thirtythree of thirty-th-SHUT THE FUCK UP RETARD
>lost an engineits fucking over, just blow it up
I can't open twitter, recommend some youtube streams sirs
V4 will fix this
>engine lost >DGAF still going absolute chad booster
ice or what
>another engine lost
>>17062837estronaut
LOST ANOTHER ONEELON KEKS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>17062813No catch, no views
>>17062837https://www.youtube.com/live/bUj5OY5APd0
>>17062840my copium says the other one is out intentionally to make it nice n symmetric
do they normally go out. this is my first launch
>>17062837https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bUj5OY5APd0
>p-pls have at least 11 engine function on reentryBAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
>NOMINAL TRAJECTORYNOMINAL TRAJECTORY>NOMINAL TRAJECTORY
Why does he look like this? Why doesn't he dress in a way that hides his disgusting body?
>>17062850They shouldn't but they do. Only few flights had all working fine.
>>17062850Yeah, it's a scam rocket afterall. No quality control.
WILL IT LAND, PLACE YA BETS
she is a very beautiful spaceship, I am sure you're proud
>>17062850it's pretty cramped down there
>>17062850yes desu, they were mostly able to fix them when V2 was mature but they switched to raptor V3 and changed a bunch of other things with V3 stack
>>17062833>>17062846KABOOOOM LOL
FINALLY
WOOOOOOOOO
Banan
>ship engine out
ship engine outFUCK
booster landing succeeded
Ice is Nice!
>SOFT BOOSTER SPLASHDOWNalmost a flawless launch so far, sans the two booster engines out
>>17062854Why doesn't he take retatrutide?
Have the booster wonnered this time?
>lost engineHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Looking like she's leaning a bit
>>17062865NO ORBIT TODAY
it's fucking ogre
Jesus, just trash the raptors and start from beginning.
>>17062859and this is where id store my niggersIF I HAD ANY
>soft landing SPCX at 200 to day
>Vacuum raptor lostFUCKING RIP
ehh, maybe put those heat exchangers on
ENGINE OUTFUUUUUUUCK
WE'RE IN SPACE ANON!
>>17062864
>>17062829That's why they have 33
>Booster landed successfully>Engine is out on upper stageWhy the fuck can't they get both of these working at the same time, jfc. It's always one or the other
>11 engines on booster flight number 14>5 engines on starshipkek it will take atleast 20+ testflights if ever
>the ship is cookedim going to bed
STOP PUTTING FUCKING ICE IN THESE FUCKING THINGS GRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH
circularize, god damn it
fuck raptor fuck musk
NO ORBIT NO ORBIT NO ORBIT
This is why we test. AHAHAHA.
Shes spinning out of control
if they hired better announcers i reckon the launch would be successful
Why the fuck is Raptor 3 so unreliable?
Anyone know the status of the booster? Did it blow up or is it intact?
i've lost the optimism i once had for this project
Uh oh, stock bros?
>>17062881>BEST*CLAP*>PART*CLAP*>IS*CLAP*>NO*CLAP*PART*CLAP**CLAP**CLAP*
I woke up early for this?
>>17062898it's the fucking ice, they need to just put fucking heat exchangers on it already instead of pumping burned product back into the tanks.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>17062897where the fuck is Insprucker
AWWWWW
useless. no orbit
no
Quick fail this time
>ERMMMMM WE'RE NOT CONFIDENT DOING AN ORBIT NOW THAT THAT ENGINE WE DON'T NEED STOPPED WORKINGAnother flight wasted. What a stupid fucking rocket
>SUBORBITALSUBORBITAL>SUBORBITALyeah im out
for fucks sake
No orbit LMAOOOOOOOOOOO
>>17062803PFFTTTHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
my stocks
>no orbitFUCK
no>EEENSERTION
I fucking knew it.
>>17062900its like watching the same episode of a tv show you once liked over and over
>No orbit insertion expecteddomp ze spacex stocks
>no orbiti'm out, cya.fucking fix your engines.
STANDBYSTANDBYSTANDBYSTANDBYSTANDBYSTANDBY
>S41>41'd itself
>no orbitit's over
uh oh
>KWABtor 3>dropping in the poo ocean
Raptor 3 is fucked bro JUST COMMIT YOU FUCKS
DO ITHOLY FUCK
so, when is flight 15?
We're never going to Mars, isn't it
>WE'RE NOT GIVING UP YET
>yeah its not safe for us to go to orbit>musk: GO TO FUCKING ORBIT MY STOCK IS FUCKED IF YOU DONT>ok sir
SIKE
WAIT
UNLESS.....
See you guys in like 3 months
>>17062937kek
FUCKING SEND ITTTTTTTTTTTTTT
ELON MADE THE BOSS CALLRESTART POSSIBLE
>RECHECKING FOR ORBITRECHECKING FOR ORBIT>RECHECKING FOR ORBITRECHECKING FOR ORBIT>RECHECKING FOR ORBITRECHECKING FOR ORBIT>RECHECKING FOR ORBITRECHECKING FOR ORBIT>RECHECKING FOR ORBITRECHECKING FOR ORBIT>RECHECKING FOR ORBITRECHECKING FOR ORBIT
>>17062937it's more likely than you think that this is how it went down
>can't even orbitWhat are these egg heads even fucking doing?
ultimate blue ball adventure
Elon personally taking command
>let me dump my stocks first
>trump told the safety folks to fuck off and do it anywayHOOOOOOOOLD
actual nail biter
>>17062946flat chests are so much better
>>170629332027
ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER ITS OVER
>go into orbit>lose control of rocket>becomes a great reality television show of where exactly on the planet it lands>it ends up hitting North KoreaGod I hope it happens.
Man stockfags are mentally ill
When will they learn?
DON'T KEK ME ELONACCELERATECCELERATE
they've asked grok what to do and they're waiting for its response
>>17062948watching numbers on their stonks go up (now going down)
>>17062960is this the rocket flight telemetry data?
>>17062958Fat fits, fat ass, fat thighs, fat cockThat is the best type of woman
they should be calling Isaacman for real-time verbal permissionthere's no way he's not watching this shit
Its the fucking ice you absolute baboons
>>17062929>>17062952>>17062960AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>17062960>mission fails>loses tens of billions of dollars in addition to thatpoor elon
Now that the orbital flight is settled, what is this? Aliens?
>>17062960>-2%MORE!!!
>>17062975weather balloon
>>17062971or duffy or whoever the fuck
>an engine got shockwaved >again you'd think they would at least expect air blasts from an engine that can send Falcon 1 to fucking orbit singlehandedly to be a bit destructive and brace engine parts for it, even more so with hawt staging
European man once more reaching for something beyond his grasp... leave this trim, finite room and go to confront the infinite
>>17062970Man of culture
>>17062980they're probably vibe-coding everything now which is why everything is going to shit
Okay niggas let's stop using grok for now, they need all the compute available to decide on orbiting
"Yes, we continue to standby">con-teen-uu tuu staahn biiii!keep giving me hope, my girl
4 V3 flight attempts and always Raptors failed.
>>17062979>>17062971Trump is on the phone right NOW telling every agency to fuck off and give SpaceX the GO
>>17062987This could unironically be a real scenario in the future
>>17062991>>17062980
@grok Give us the go/no-go. Think hard.
>raptor vacuum engine>not used in space>sea level raptor>used for orbital insertion and deorbit
It would crash on the heads of southern hemispere thirdies anyway, SEND IT!
come on Elon, do it do it do it! Go for orbit!
spacex engineers sweating massive bullets right now
>>17062981problem?
>>17062997yeah, who gives a shit about them
There's shit coming off.
PLEASE! I BEG YOU! JUST GO!!!
>>17063004>all this nail biting over a NINETEEN SECOND burn
>>17062996Vacuum can not gimble
But I thought Raptor 3 was supposed to be way better, I mean look at it. Isn't this supposed to be peak rocket engine?
>NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO
Would Kessler Sneedrome be bad for the stock price?
>>17063004Times are all fucked since they an engine(s)
>I need a drink
Looks like he picked the wrong week to stop drinking.
Why don't they just hit a quicksave and see what happens?
>>17063010>NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO! NO, GO!
Evens=goOdds=no go
>NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO NO GO
>>17063018WE GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN
>>17063018nice!
GO!!!!!
HERE WE GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WE ARE SO BACK
GO FOR ORBITFUCK YOU
LEESSSSSGOOOOOOOO
HOLY FUCKING SHITGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>17063018the evens of truth
>GAAN FOR ORBITOH SHIT OH FUCK
GOGOGO ANONONON
>>17063018how did he know
GO FOR ORBIT
GO GO GO!@!@!
YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH
WE'RE FUCKING BACK LETS GOOOOOOO
ORBIT IS GO
WE'RE SO BACK
>>17063018GO FOR ORBIT!!!!!!
>>17062990JFC why are other phaseniggas just randomly manifesting?
>turns out you can just do things
>>17063021GO FOR ORBIT
WE GAAN
THAT'S RIGHT BABY, PUSH IT TO THE LIMIT. NO BALLS!
Most nail biting launch yet lol
>WE GO
Hot damn stocks are really that powerful.
Thunderf00t bros...
EXCITEMENT GURANTEED!
It's onhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waqaHUcHjtU
>>17063018witnessed
ORBITAHAHAHHAA
GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO GO
We are fucking back
Buy ze dip.
WHAT A TWIST
Can't keep a good rocket down
>failed ship into orbityikes were gonna ge grounded by fcc for the rest of 2k26flight 15 in 2k27 lmao (and still will have engines out)
this is the second craziest launch after the one that landed super heavy
>>17063018BASED AS FUCK
>elon personally came into the room and punched the teeth out of the pussy ass go no go team.based
>>17063009too OP for it's own good
>inb4 SIKE
Earth is really big
>>17063041You have no idea our spread
BUY BUY BUY!!!!
>>17062960WE ARE SO BACK
>BZZZZZ
>>17063074this shit is so dumb lol
So uhhhh when's the insertion burn
How do you even lose engines lmao, just make the same exact ship you made last time
>>17063071I've seen bigger
>>17063011It would be very painful
GAAN STATUS: WE
>>17063074Hope you bought the dip
>>17063071HOW BIG IS SPACE ANON?
What terrifies me is if Starship were to detonate over a big city in a failed re-entry and killing 5 thousand Americans. Imagine the backlash against Elon Musk?
>>17063052Hold.If they get stranded in orbit there will be so much more winning.
>>17063080That's what she said
>>17063078By getting ice in fuel lines
>>17063074stocks are so fucking retarded lol.this shit is literally just the manifestation of a schizophrenic collective's confidence in something.
>>17063068>"PLEASE DADDY TRUMP, PLEASE DON'T SANCTION SPACEX IF THIS ALL FUCKS UP. PLEASE I PROMISE I WON'T MENTION THE EPSTEIN FILES EVER AGAIN."What really happened.
>>17063041
>>17063078the engines are vibe manufactured with Grok
>>17062788YEAH? YEAH NIGGER????
LOOK AT HIM GO
>>17063085The rest of the world would forever celebrate him
Engines status?
STARSHIP IS ORBITAL
FINALLY!
FIVE ENGINES OUT>FIVE ENGINES OUTFIVE ENGINES OUT>FIVE ENGINES OUT
STARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITALSTARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITALSTARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITALSTARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITALSTARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITALSTARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITALSTARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITALSTARSHIP IS ORBITAL>STARSHIP IS ORBITAL
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA
ok so now nothing for the next 8 hoursbye bye
in orbit, its done
what now that it's orbital?
>O R B I T A L
NO ORBITFAGS ABSOLUTELY AND HISTORICALLY BTFO!!!!!!!!!
OOH OOH OOH OOH OOH
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA FINALLYYYYYYYY
That was a really short burn, was that really all that was needed? Why the go/no go?
we did it, bros
>out of control megabomb in orbityeah congrats in that i guess..
>>17063111Multiplanetary species
>>170631099 minutes
>says no orbit>goes to orbit anywaysBut why
EDSTRANNIES QUICK WE HAVE TO MOVE THE GOALPOST NOW!
>>17063116It was always on the verge of orbit during tests. They just needed a bit longer burn.
Melon Husk should donate to 4channel for materializing an orbit decision by >>17063018
Trust the plan, Mars is still viable
SLS here, welcome to the club Starship.
>>17063116they needed time to buy the dip
>>17063116The joke is that the difference between suborbital missions is actually just a few seconds of engine fire from a single engine. All starship flights have basically been slightly below orbital speed until now.
it blew up
>>17063116Engine damage could mean a fuel leak, which would mean they wouldn't be able to do a controlled deorbit and we'd have "where will it land" bingo
it's actually ridiculous how piss easy for the starship to rise to orbital, like afaik these are the most powerful engine setup that have touched orbit status
starship is, as of now, the heaviest and largest single object ever put in orbit, in all of human history.naysayers can do naught but seethe.
>>17063125nothing to move when both booster and ship had massive engine failures that still dont display capability beyond laucnhing dummies
>>17063122yeah but do i really want to watch it push out stuff for 30 minutes.. it wont be different to the other flights
LightningLeg status?
>>17063123You can just do things
>>17063098they'll dump it on WA again
>>17063134FTS explosion
If dubs and if the upper stage survives the landing again, everyone in here has to post their dicks
>>17062780>Finally going to try for orbit? Thunderf00t on suicide watchLmao that faggot should just shut the fuck up and fuck off now
>retards who closed the stream early btfo
>>17063018Put me in the screencap
>>17063116yes, why is that surprising?they haven't gone to orbit because starship can re-enter and if its uncontrollable it could rain debri on peoplegoing to orbit isn't difficult, doing it safely for bystanders with this new type of vehicle is
>>17063140nope, your goalposts have been destroyed and you must move them again, sorry.
>>17063120Fail to see the problem...
>>17063134>14 FLIGHTS and TRILLIONAIRE FELON HUSKS SHIP still EXPLODE
>>17063134I never understood why super heavy can take tremendous G forces but the second it soft splashes into the ocean it always detonates. It didn't even fall over.
>>17063149kita the sex
Doomer sisters, our response?
>>17063131Gay and Bezospilled
>>17063123You can just do things.
>>17063155Emotion
So:>Starship in orbit>Booster landed for the first time in a whileDoes this mean we'll see a catch attempt soon?
>>17063149i closed the stream when they said no orbit and then watched a movie clip and came back at the perfect moment to hear them say they were going anyway.i didn't have the moment of uncertainty watching the stream that you did, and went to go watch something else, and was then still rewarded for coming back.i am the biggest winner of all.
so if this all goes to plan, what happens to the employees who voted 'no' in the poll
Was it me or did the booster come in too hot? No hover? Nobody did the telescope stream of the booster coming back as far as I can tell.
>>17063147It's still a scam, world hunger could be solved, the ebola issues in africa helped, healthcare for all, yet we fall for this scam. This thing will NEVER reach the moon, it's not going to happen.
>>17063098Just like every Chinese launch when they were building their station.
>>17063155they blew it up with FTS (Flight Termination System), i.e. a bunch of explosives
>>17063134>SIRSTEMS NARMAL
>>17063162Catch attempt for both booster and ship in two weeks
engines going out dont matter xisters
>>17063157You just delayed inevitable entropy... for now...
>>17063158I hope Bezos does it again. He must.
>>17063166see >>17063125
>>17063134
DOOR NOT STUCK>DOOR NOT STUCKDOOR NOT STUCK>DOOR NOT STUCKDOOR NOT STUCK>DOOR NOT STUCKDOOR NOT STUCK>DOOR NOT STUCK
>>17063155hitting the water is really tough it rips open the tanks. It is basically like a coke can you stand 4 people on when closed but you can crush it with one hand when open
payload deploy coming up
>>17063162Yes it should be able to land on the tower now. I'm still not convinced the super heavy landing went well though. We didn't even see it this time
>>17063165if they thought the booster was going to be successful, they would've had another camera angle showing it come down. but they did not
These Starlinks can they be raised to viable orbits for a long duration or is this some joke test?
>>17063157If the deorbit burn fails it could cause a catastrophe and SpaceX will be nationalized and Elon being deported back to Africa.
do any of these starlinks have cameras pointed at the ship?
>>17063162flight 15 - ship catchflight 16 - launch from floridaflight 17 - maybe ship + booster catch
>>17063187i believe so, yes.
>>17063185wdym? They are already in orbit rn
>>17063185They have their own thursters, they are going into an orbit.
Thunderf00t owes me an apology
>>17063164The same who gave a no to Starliner.
STARLINK DEPLOYED
It's giving birth to Starlings.
>>17063188so mid-late 2027
starship has now made its first revenue
>>17063195the satellites have hall-effect thrusters and will go into a higher orbit.
>>17063196This has gotta feel so good for the ship
YAAAAATAAAAAAAAAA
TWENTY SIX TERABITS???
>>17063201no those should all be done before thanksgiving
>>17063195they always do this so if there is a problem with something on the sats they passively deorbit quickly instead of staying in orbit and becoming debris
>>17063149>>17063163The first stream I clicked on was NSF, when they had the engine failure I closed it and switched to Clear, GO FOR ORBITdid I jinx the launch? (unknown)did clear save the day? (yes)
>deployed functional payloads to orbityep, I think starship is operational now. it’s been a fun testing campaign but now its over.
>>17063185dtc shell is only 340km
>>17063203That's what i was wondering. Obviously they have thrusters but is it something close to nominal expected lifespan once they raise their orbit or shortened.
>>17063206no he said teraBYTES, the fucking moronic announcers
She's so cute bros...
MY INTERNET SPEEDS JUST FLEW OVER MY HOUSE
by this time next year, starship launches won't be news anymorekinda sad, in a way
>>17063218>only the smart races
Starship over the skeleton coast
>>17063091>>17063072
>>17063220next up, waiting for HLS testing
>>17063220>starship flight 52>booster still loses half of its engines on ignition
Darkness soon
>>17063221Best race and best race's best friend
>>17063218saar
>First two satellites already onlineWEGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN
>>17063215
>>17063210So when are they going to stop saying le payload is le data and it's just a le test so all of the anomalies are NBD don't look at all of the clogged engines and plasma still leaking behind the tiles?
>>17063218>>17063221Stop trying to erase black excellence, chud.
>>17063220I doubt it, we thought that last year too.
>>17063223anti-ship ballistic missiles is spaceflight
>>17063218if you think about it there is actually a lot of blacks in the frame of the starship camera
>>17063213Starlink satellites are always deployed in a safe orbit with passiv return in case they don't start up.
So Starship's sole purpose is a satellite shitter?
>>17063215>>17063233Where deep fake porns?
>that's a lot of bands!
Two deployed starlink sats already active and communicationg with the network.
>>17063237>>17063223>brownoids fantasizing about hitting carriersthat's so adorable.
>>17063212>>17063235where are the indians
>>17063233I miss 3D Clear
How many Kg is this launch?
>>17063241seething
@gork what would happen to an EDSer who "accidentally" found ximself in the Starship flame trench during a test? consider both water only and full duration booster engine tests
>>17063251something like 40-50 000kg
How many Falcon 9 flights would it take to launch today's interwebs capacity?
>>17063255like 9 hours from now bruh
>>1706325126 times whatever the V3 mass is + test hardware
>>17063241Mars is the carrot. You can't get people to give their all for a global telco business.
>>17063258~34 I think, provided it's fully loaded every time.
>>17063258from stream right now: 20
>>1706325126 V3 starlink sats is 52000 KG in a single launch, one of the heaviest single payloads ever lofted.
>>17063254For someone with EDS the mechanical insult is worse than for typical connective tissue. Skin can tear with relatively little force (classic “fish-mouth” wounds in classical EDS), joints sublux or dislocate easily, and vessels bruise or leak more readily. Cold water plus the shock can also trigger temperature dysregulation and autonomic symptoms that many people with hEDS already have. Survival is possible in principle if they are near an exit and the flow is not at peak, but serious injury is the expected result.
>SpaceX has not published an official flight mass for Starlink V3 on its product page. The figure that appears consistently in reporting and in the company’s FCC materials is about 2,000 kg (roughly 4,400 lb) dry mass, with some filings using 2,000–2,500 kg as upper bounding cases for debris analysis.
>>17063264>one of the heaviestyawn another record NOT broken by the glorious starship
>>17063254>>17063266There is no realistic “edge of the trench” that is safe during a 33-engine burn. The water is there to protect steel and concrete, not people.EDS makes the already unsurvivable situation worse. Fragile collagen means tissues resist tearing, stretching, and sudden pressure changes even less well. Heat intolerance and poor thermoregulation are common. Vascular EDS (the rare, most dangerous subtype) adds risk of arterial rupture under blast loading; even the more common hypermobile and classical types have skin, vessel, and joint fragility that would turn the mechanical and thermal insult into more extensive damage.
>>17063263thats one falcon 180 for those of you keeping score at home
all of that starlink ram sent to rot in orbit could've gone to starving african children
>>17063268Well it's still handily the most in a reusable launch platform. I think the Space Shuttle's record was around 24,000kg
@grok is this true?
>starship hasn't even completed its first orbital starlink launch and I'm already bored of it.
>>17063251>Q2 2026 worldwide spacecraft upmass: 732,519 kg. One 26-sat V3 load at ~2 t each is about 52 t, which is ~7% of the entire planet’s quarterly payloadso 1.75% of the WORLD'S ANNUAL MASS TO ORBIT launched on a SINGLE FLIGHT
lots of UFOs out there when they show space view
>>17063277You forgot to add the rotational speed of the earth. They launched eastwards.
So it's coming down around Hawaii, right? Is there any cameras around there to catch the descent?
>>17063277ask it to add the rotational speed of the earth to that number
>>17063280Space rats
uh... what is this?
>>17063282chile
> Skylab — about 77 tonnes, 14 May 1973 (Saturn V).>That’s the heaviest single payload left in orbit on one launch. Shuttle flights were heavier at insertion (orbiter + cargo), but the orbiter came back. ISS mass is from many launches, not one.
>>17063281>>17063283but it's in space not earth so why does that mattter?
>>17063287xrg
>>17063278laucnhes are boring i want to see landings
>>17063282No, there's a several hundred mile radius area in the pacific where cameras cannot exist, similar to how the south atlantic magnetic anomaly prevents magnets from existing
>>17063287ayyy monitoring
>>17063287ZALGO!
>>17063290where did it come from, dingus?what was its initial velocity?
So much ice. Looks cool tho
ANON I'M LOOKING AT SPACE!
>>17063287
wtf are all these fireflies??
>>17063267if we assume each satellite is 2000 KG, this payload is beaten in mass by only 3 other payloads:Polyus satellite: 80.000 KGSkylab: 77.111 KGapollo 16 CSM+LEM: 52.759 KG
Unfortunately this flight was a complete and unmitigated failure.
>15tbit added so farWhat does this mean for in-flight and cruise ship wifi?
>>17063274Thank God it didn't. Africa shouldn't have more than half a million people total.
>>17063294No I meant the descent, like seeing it in the atmosphere, not where it lands. I didn't know if it was gonna pass close enough that people might be able to catch a glimpse of it from the ground as it descended, or if it was gonna be too far offshore to spot
Is this good enough so for a catch next flight?
>>17063278Unironically what will start becoming impressive, assuming everything with Starship goes as it's been promised, is less about the rockets themselves and how much shit they'd be able to haul up into space. This is especially true if it reaches the kind of cadence that Elon keeps promising.It'll feel insane if we go from "yeah, we landed back on the Moon with people again" to a year or two later "yeah so now we're recreating Moon Base Alpha memes with real people", and then political shitposting about who owns which moon crater.
>>17063302Space bugs
>>17063290Launching eastwards gave it a "kick" so to speak.
RIGHT ABOUT NOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wD6jCMn5nq0
>LASER CONTACT CONFIRMEDstarlink is basically alien tech
>>17063277>Earth spins at a speed of about 1,670 kilometers per hour (1,040 miles per hour) at the equator
>space laser contactsick
nice, another dozens of metal rubbish shitting up the orbitHeil Hitler
>>17063311I agree on payload being a game changer. I still wish Elon went with 12m hulls and tried a real landing leg system. I feel we could have gotten here sooner.
>velocity going up>altitude going downDoesn't this mean it's reentering?
>>17063310depends how deorbit and landing do dunnit
why not just wait for daylight to deploy the imaging starlinks?
In Star Trek the Vulcans introduced themselves after humanity reached a certain technological level, will the same happen in the real world?
>>17063324he's autistically stubborn and refuses to admit his wrongs, for better or worse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heaviest_spacecraftif starship is 100 tons and the payload is 52 tons then starship has already BTFO all of these in terms of total single launch mass of the spacecraft.
>>17063325just means it's not perfectly circular
>>17063311Do you think Trump will visit the moon
>>17063325it can be on an ellyptical orbit, right?
>>17063328Hopefully they can solve the issues of africa and the middle east <3
>>17063325play kerbal space program.
>>17063329>DEAN Engines can do everything Raptor can and better with aerospikes>"Yeah, well, I want normal engine bells"shame
RIP to the people that ragequit at the first NOGO lmao
Uhh Felonchuds, our response??
>>17063324Fake, the moon is smaller than the earth irl
>>17063325It is like a marble rolling down hill then up and falling back. If it is not perfectly circular it will do that.
>>17063338i ragequit but came back just in time, my toxic relationship with starship drew me back in just a few minutes.
>>17063339Who asked?Ignore the fag.
>Success (Starlink)
>>17063339>i-if i count the test launches as failures to achieve orbit!i think he's putting it on, this is just his grifter persona, you can bet he has spacex stock.
>>17063328they did that after space travel with the speed of lightwe still even can't travel to space. The fact that this is a big event just shows, how backwards and stone-age like humans still are
Ship is past perigee and continuing to lose altitude. Looks like orbit has not been achieved and they're lying to us.
>>17063347wrong.
>>17063302it's ice falling off starship
>>17063344good job monkey, you managed to upload a with an uncomplete legend kys ape
>>17063352nah it's aliens
>>17063348Unfortuantely I am right. The launch was a complete disaster. I am hearing it straight from a SpaceX insider who said that higher ups personally intervened to push the orbit burn through despite all the safety mechanisms telling them not to.
>>17063339did he delete this?
>>17063351he's not.
>>17063339KWAB
>>17063357you're wrong.
>>17063361Prove me wrong SpaceX employee
yeah they are going to de"orbit"that sat deployment was rushed
>>17063361and you will never be a woman
>>17063357
>>17063245They did hit them last week, keep up.
>>17063357>>17063347Unlike you, most of us at least have a basic grasp of orbital mechanics. This is what happens when the orbit isn't perfectly circular. See you in a bit when that altitude creeps back up.
>>17063357My dad at SpaceX told me your source is a faggot and nobody sits with him at lunch and also they spit in his froyo
see yall in 20 minutes
>>17062566/u/ reporting in. All systems nominal. GO.
>>17063365i belong here, you do not, go back.
>>17063368i never said i would be one, i have no desire to be one.i was assigned as a man at birth, i have an xy chromosome, i do not identify as anything other than a man.sorry my posts made you so upset.
>>17063367>rushedIt took way longer than usual lmao
>>17063357>lying on the internet
>>17063357chinese hands typed that
What was the test about?
>>17063370they didn't, my brown friend, you keep doing this over and over again.brownoids have not hit a carrier.
Okay I'm bored now when next flight?
Elon lovers will get orbital and EDS will get Starship crashing into a city. Everyone will be happy.
>>17063357>seething Blue Origin hands are responsible for this post.
>>17063357>higher ups personally intervened to push the orbit burn through despite all the safety mechanisms telling them not toNeed emergency gigachad
the full 6 orbits will take around 9 hours btw.>>17063387yes, i do, you do not, you have to go back.
>>17063371Altitude just creeped up, it's hilarious he tried to shitpost without a basic grasp of orbital mechanics
Contact made with all 26 sats.
>>17063386>BOsissies drastically looking for something they can use for another "welcome to the club" tweet
cute clear english
>>17063393to the contrary, i am more human than normalfags are.
>>17063212God I'm disgusted by millennials so much
>>17062609>is that the woman that posted her vagina online for no reason after getting a small following through her art?
Nice kino. SS starts to look like a finished product.
>>17063339But this is the first orbital flight of Starship? How can it fail at goal it never had until now?
>>17063388>"Mr Gigachad, our telemetry is looking pretty bad, i don't think we can go forward wi-""Do it.">"B-but t-the FAA wi-""I don't care, do the orbit burn.">"Okay but we still have to discuss it with ou-""Fuck the go no go poll, send it.">"Y-yes sir."
There's no way SpaceX is actually faking the altitude numbers on the stream right now to show us that they're in "orbit." These numbers are just not real. I can't wait until independent telemetry is published and the stock price comes tumbling down. What a disaster.
>>17063403>that need everything explained to youi know what ironic shitposting is, i just don't think it's funny, and i will make literal replies with the actual truth every time, much to the chagrin of angry normalfags such as you.i'm sorry my brick-wall like nature makes you so upset, none of your word games or attempts at making me feel socially disadvantaged work.
>>17063399When we will go multiplanetary and establish demographic colonization policies, I preemptively pity the anon that will pull her at the space mandated gf gacha
Ouch... What's going on?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUj5OY5APd0
>>17063412based
>>17063414the classic 10am dump/sell the news
>>17063405
Time to buy the dip?
>>17063413>state mandated gf's>you get her in the lottery>tries to take her clothes off>"i already seen it"
>>17063425>n-no! you're ostracized ostracized ostracized!>y-you're weird!good, that makes me superior to you.i accept your concession.
https://www.spacex.com/updates#orbital-starship
>>17063427b-buy the d-d-dip fellow apes?do your thing reddit!
>>17063339his life must be perpetual seethe at this point
>>17063357>higher ups personally intervened to push the orbitYou forgot to attach the gigachad image
>>17063435jesus christ, why did you post that
>>17062630I unironically spent a ~30 minute uber ride with a schizo who rambled on about space being fake and his congressman being a lizard.I just nodded my head and looked around to make sure he was driving me to the airport and not taking me to some fucking back alley to eat my skin or whatever.There's a lot of genuine psycho retards out there.
>>17063435Looks half prolapsed. Nice.
>>17063438>>17063441Now you seen't
Flight update when?
>>17063435
Sar please don't post vagene
>>17063339
>>17063444now
>>17063435I guess I'll be gay from now on
>>17063442see >>17063430
>>17063435>ITT: incels who have not seen an average vagina outside of porn.
>>17063444Early deorbit.
>>17063450Oof its over for spacex isnt it?
"orbit"
>>17063402The goal of a rocket is always orbit. They don't blow up millions just to see how well they explode. If they could have gone to orbit with the first one they would have just done that.
How the fuck is it a successful orbit if they didn't even complete one orbit?
>>17063444now: early deorbit in less than an hour, just to be safe
>>17063453I'm sorry about your ugly vagina
>>17063453GUYS LOOK A FEMALE WITH A SMELLY VAGINA ON /sfg/ HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>17063339.
>>17063439psycho retards, on my Bulgarian pottery Android™ 17 application? find that very hard to believe
So wait they are splashing down off the west coast of the USA now?WTF
>3hr mission now instead of the full 10Boil-off rates must've been higher than they were expecting.
>>17063453>t. pizza cake
>>17063459It will be 1.75 orbits roughly
>>17063453yeah, but the problem is that was intended to be porn
>>17063453I'm sorry about your weird pussy
why was this flight such an abysmal failure that will be repeated again in the next flight
>>17063469MOOOODSSS
>>17063469that's a man.
>>17063463Humiliation kink
>>17063473Why are you a retard?
>>17063435whats the evolutionary reason this is so vile
They're deorbiting early? So they have a prop leak or too much boil off or something? No prop transfer demo in the next two quarters kek
>>17063453ehh
>>17063435I legit might be gay cock just looks so tasty on a girls body. Looks like the aftermath of a car bombing outside a kebab shop>OH YEH BABY I LOVE THOSE CRISPY LOOKING BROWN FLAPS
Hurricane spotted
>>17063482maybe there is no point orbiting a bunch of times ?
>>17063463>OKAY so falcon became reusable>OKAY so heavy falcon became reusable>OKAY so Starlink actually was way more useful than initially thought>OKAY so Starship booster was catchable>OKAY so Starship could engine relight>OKAY so cybertrucks actually are out performing trucks in cost with gas going up so what>OKAY so what starship did launch new Starlink>OKAY so what starship did do 2.5 orbits>It will never be reusable and get to the moon, just a scamAt what fucking point do you just phone it in, his patreon has to be making bank with TDS and EDS turdworlders. I don't mind him for being skeptical initially but how is this not just borderline retardation how come he never attacks China's copycat shit.
>>17063468
>>17063488>so cybertrucks actually are out performing trucks in cost with gasNot with the built quality and constant recalls they arent.
>>17063486Trump stopped these from showing up
>>17063492For a first v1 model they aren't that horrible, yeah they have some dumbass problems QA should have looked at prior to rushing to market but it's not chinesium explodium
Why are there scientific studies about penis size but not about flapiness of vaginas? What does the median flapiness vagina looks like?
Why are stocks going down if this was such a success like /sci/ told me? Doesn't make much sense.
>>17063495He moved them to the pacific ocean
>>17063488Can you quote any statement where he said that those things will never happen? Laughing at 20 failures and then saying the 21st wasn't a fail won't erase you being right 20 times in a row nor will it erase the failures.
>>17063499>Why are stocks going downAnswered your own question there.
We should sell Starships to China and bankrupt their space startups.
>>17063499Because SpaceX is primarily an AI company.
>>17063510There are already too many Chinese people in space.
>>17063488>At what fucking point do you just phone it inhe'll stop when his patreon stop bringing enough money he's been making thousands per month for years, just to make cringe video shitting on Musk
>>17063499Grok didn't fix Starshit
>>17063498Best apply for that research grand anon. There's clearly a gap in the gash flap data that needs to be filled
>>17063481Honestly still gross. Cock is so much better. Gaychads always winning.
Over the Gulf of America
>>17062524you and your descendants will be bound to earth forevermay your cursed lineage end in the dirt
>>17063503I don't have the time to pull the massive amounts of tweets, deleted tweets, and clips off live streams. He's said either those, maybe not verbatim but yeah not too hard to find.I remember him specifically harking on Falcon resue because "NASA already looked at this and said it wasn't worth it or viable" but that was waaaaaay back in the day when I still followed him from solar freakin roadways.
>>17063155It's designed to handle the thrust. It's not designed to handle massive asymmetrical lateral impulses.Have a day.
>>17063524>massive amountOne would do for starters. The tweet you quoted for instance is 100% factually correct on his part. The startship is 0% reusable and it's years late and it's not delivering the payloads it was designed for. That in the business would be called over promising and under delivering.
>>17063524There's no use in arguing, just screencap and laugh at them later.
>missed the launchLel, fugg>>17063155It's a deliberate response for SH. Don't really want a bunch of steel cans just floating in the ocean, so they deliberately detonate the booster as it hits the gulf.>>17063435DAMN that's a roast>>17063453ROASTIE SPOTTED>>17063488Fr. Has CommonSenseSlapstick been saying anything lately?>>17063530Can you list any competition that's noticeably better than what Elon's got?
>>17063456Ship-catch-on-next-flight bros...
>>17063530>it's not delivering the payloads it was designed forIt literally deployed starlink V3 today and they are already operational... Starship has always been designed to make starlink the opex costs and income while it gets other contracts.
>>17063536Don't link these normalfags to /sfg/, fagot
>>17063481Only hot cause it looks like a nice ballsack pulled tight. Just like when you fuck a girl doggy looking down they look like you are fucking the head of a giant penis. women are gay as fuck
>>17063372hot barista spit or... ?
>>17063463he's SO MAD!HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>17063535>Can you list any competition that's noticeably better than what Elon's got?Can you point out where he said one exists?>>17063539>It literally deployed starlink V3 todayAgain please provide single instance where he said this was false. OP's tweet is 100% correct on his part.
>>17063384This one is still happening!
>>17063543Ocelot spit
catch never
>>17063546>OP's tweet is 100% correct on his part.What tweet is in the OP?
>>17063552Click on the meme arrows till you find it.
>>17063453My girlfriend has a good looking cunt. Enjoy suffering
I muted the stream to good to umas why are they de-orbiting early?
>>17063557Can confirm anon's gf has a decent hole, I'm sure several other anons can as well.
>>17063530the tweet he quoted is 100% factually incorrect, actually. it's feels based retardation.
>>17063562Concession accepted
>>17063546it isn't.
>>17063553Or, it's because they have all the data they can grab from the orbit you dunce. >>17063558All starlinks deployed, all tests done, all inspections done, why keep it up there for 7-8 more hours for basically no reason. Also they are plopping it right to Hawaii so they might be able to recover it.Also, no Chines-I mean Chile "fishing boats" that could come "rescue" a floating ship
>>17063558Which equine female?
>>17063308That's half a million people too many. Africa should be a huge animal sanctuary, with only a few thousand white people so take care of everything
seeing a lot of cope itt (in this thread)
>>17063568They wouldn't do an early deorbit if they didn't have to. "they already got all the data" is a massive cope
>>17063564i didn't concede anything, my angry, EDS-ridden fren.i'm sorry that your favourite grifter is wrong and you got scammed by him, hope you feel better eventually.>>17063571yep, mostly from anti-spacex EDSers.
so whenever starship does burns isn't it going to be slamming into some of this ice it's generating from venting?
This whole launch is all over the place and it's hard to say if it was a success.
So is this early deorbit going to result in a daytime splashdown or no?
>>17063573Again the tweet is simply factually and objectively correct. If you disagree you are in lalaland and I have no choice but to accept your concession. You should take your meds.
>>17063568oh yeah makes sense I guess to just get it down early. Doing an extra few orbits doesn't really prove anything does it?>>17063569Cafe
>>17063489He deleted it. What a faggot. He's still seething about orange man as of a few hours ago. His life must be Hell
>>17063551I think even disposable starship is 100% viable as a product. It likely could do 100 tonnes single use or just booster recovery and set up a deal to recycle them/ crash into a nice empty spot
>>17063575the ship is in orbit and it's easy to say if it was a success: YES
>>17063570Imagine how peaceful that would be>>17063580>His life must be HellGood.
>>17063582It's still a test mission and not starlink.
>>17063568eventually starship is going to need to spent a lot longer than 7-8 hours in orbit for rendezvousing, getting data on boil-off and long-term exposure to vacuum is kind of important. there must be a leak or they're worried about the engines still and want to quit while they're ahead
>>17063581you claw back a lot of payload mass when you ditch the tps and fins. still haven’t engineered a big door though.
>>17063546I'm asking you, not him. Unless of course...>>17063568The intention was to orbit a few more times tbf, but yeah this has the same sort of cope as tankies trying to pretend that US lost the space race.
>>17063489He is spamming "Nobody cares anymore, kiddo." at everyone calling him out.>>17063580No, it's still up.
>>17063588>I'm asking youWell then can you provide a single one of my posts where I claimed otherwise?
>>17063585The starlink deployed are going to stay up for a good long time, they have their own thrusters and fuel for this mission.>>17063586I mean they have a window to drop it in their sweet spot they've always wanted of Hawaii, why not take the window you have.Even if this is "tinfoil" shit, I wouldn't be surprised if musk is looking at some parts of Hilo or surroundings still to launch or land starships.
ACCELERATE
>>17063585Millions of people just watched it deliver production next generation Starlink satellites live on stream
>>17063590Link it. I get zero search results
This post is now the Meme/Grudgepost anchor, reply with grudgeposts we've been saving up for years
>>17063578it is not, it is wrong, sorry this makes you so upset.>y-you conceded!i have not, sorry this makes you so upset.>sure it's 0% reusablestarship is 100% reusable and has proven this capability through numerous tests, the software used to catch the second stage will be hardly any different from catching the first stage, which has already proven to work multiple times. starship is 100% reusable.>a-and it's only 1/3rd of what it claimedspacex isn't obligated to use the maximum payload capacity of the ship, the current payload on this flight is not the ship's maximum payload capacity, this is disingenuous EDS arguing once again.>delivered 40is also hilariously wrong, he can't even get the actual payload launched on this flight right, embarrassing even for a disgraced scientist.>half a decade lateit's not late to anything, deadlines moving up is normal, spacex didn't agree on a contract with every EDSer on the globe that they had to have starship operational in 2020.>on flight 14only on the first flight that was actually going to attempt orbit, another disingenuous, lying argument, the rest were all test flights and not operational flights.all in all, a seething mess of strawmen and bad faith arguments that all fail to miss the mark and are all wrong.i'm sorry this makes you so upset.
When is it coming back?
>>17063590lmao
>>17063597
Ruh roh, the subhyman autist is having a melty
>>17063599in 1h or sohttps://x.com/SpaceX/status/2104576268624892244
>>17063587You could probably even ditch the steel for the upper section that isnt fuel tank and go with a lighter fairing. True fully disposable Superheavy and Starship would be able to hoof shitloads into orbit
>>17063601
>>17063598>starship is 100% reusableIt literally blew up again. Rest of the post is equally delusional. You need to urgently take your meds.
China won.
>>17063591>The startship is 0% reusable and it's years late and it's not delivering the payloads it was designed for. That in the business would be called over promising and under delivering.You say this as if SLS, New Glenn o algo haven't *also* been guilty of "over promising" and "under delivering" (IESLB), some at a timeframe that makes Starship look punctual on a comical level.
>>17063596Maybe those particular posts are gone, but he has made several others in the past that are still up.https://x.com/Tazerface16/status/1596355331344715777?s=20https://x.com/Tazerface16/status/1470443150669799429?s=20https://x.com/Tazerface16/status/1902361061006737557?s=20
>>17063587Yeah for sure. If they went for a disposable version they could do starship with a flat top and fairing. Could even get it human rated with a good enough escape system.
FASTER
>>17063613>yeah you "won" or whatever but I'm not owned, I'm actually really clm rn
>deorbit over South Africa
>>17063609>problems cannot be fixed
>>17063613Thanks for confirming. Crazy to see that he's Tomlinson posting.
>>17063611>You say this as if SLS, New Glenn o algo haven't *also* been guilty of "over promising" and "under delivering" (IESLB), some at a timeframe that makes Starship look punctual on a comical level.Can you point out a single instance of him (or me for that matter) saying any of this? Again please be specific and do not avoid the question.>>17063618If you haven't fixed a problem yet then you can't say the problem has been fixed. That's how progression of time works. Unless spaceX has a way to "100% reuse" a thing that has exploded then it's in fact not 100% reusable.
They fired the FTS on booster on landing apparently I missed him say it but RUDDIT SAY SO pefect de orbit that is great. JUST NEED TO SORT THE FUCKING RAPTORS but engine out performance is cool
>>17063592>The starlink deployed are going to stay up for a good long time, they have their own thrusters and fuel for this mission.They won't, license is only for 60 days. It's absolutely just a test mission.
Deorbit fart successful
>>17063575Booster landing burn was zero engine redundant. 11/13Not unqualified success.
Really great of them not stringing us along for 9 hours.
>no bingoBooooooooring
>>17063624It's over EDS bros....
>>17063623retard
>>17063609>the design that has proven it can be 100% reused on basically every technical level just can't because...i just want to be in denial for a little bit longer please!nope lol, starship upper stage will get reused, lets just knock this goalpost down now instead of clinging to it like a screeching toddler, shall we?you lost, spacex won, /sfg/ won, starship won, we accept your concession.
>>17063623>60 days of testing isn't a long timeAlright broWhere the fuck did all these EDS people come from
so why are they doing it early?
>>17063621I did answer your question, you sniveling Kurt Eichenwald-type jew. I answered it with by saying that Starship isn't particularly unique in "under delivering", and is in fact more punctual than a notable chunk its competition, then asking you to show me that there are better options for payload launches.
Do they have a team in place in Hawaii to film the landing?
>>17063621this picrel >>17063613 is you lel.
>>17063489>Elon has zero clue how rockets work.Does he think Musk builds the rockets himself or something?
>>17063632good lighting is the cope answer
>>17063631They're just in it for the (you)s, none of these anons believe the dumb shit they're posting.
>>17063613Holy shit what a retarded faggot. I mean... god damn. What the fuck drives those people to act so retarded so publicly for no benefit to themselves what so ever? Just why?
>>17063632Best guess is there isn't any testing left to do, so bringing it down when everyone on the team is alert and on site working at their peak is ideal. If you did one orbit, what's the point of doing 8 more if you completed the checklist of things to test and do?Also doing it near Hawaii has always been a long term goal for SpaceX
>>17063630>nope lol, starship upper stage will get reusedIs the upperstage 100% of the starship? Or are you simply moving the goalpost again?Concession accepted in any case.>>17063633>I did answer your questionCould you perhaps point out where you did so?>I answered it with by saying that Starship isn't particularly unique in "under delivering"Can you point out where he claims that isn't the case?
>>17063636he doesn't, but he does take part in the process, he is an engineer and has made numerous engineering decisions on starship, he was also lead on the raptor team.elon musk knows more about rocketry than the people who want to insist he is not an engineer.
It is going to land in the ABORT ZONE.
>>17063642>a-are you moving the goalpost againi have not done so a single time, that's you projecting.>c-concession acceptedthere is no concession made, my angry brown friend, there's nothing for you to accept.i do accept your concession, however, as you are wrong.
>>17063632Fuel is boiling off too fast
>I accept your concession>nuh uh I accept YOUR concessionJust fuck already, this sexual tension is unbearable.
>>17063639>What the fuck drives those people to act so retarded so publicly for no benefit to themselves what so ever? Just why?
>>17063641holy cope
>>17063645>i have not done so a single timeYou did when you claimed that an exploded thing is reusable.Again I have accepted your concession on this point already.
>>17063642Yeah, the fact that he ONLY talks about SpaceX o algo and never shit talks its competition. Not a peep about the Chinese bootlegs of the Falcon rockets, not a snicker about Boeing's Starliner, nothing.>>17063643I have my issues with Elon (i.e. the FUCK YOURSELF IN THE FACE xeet) but he's still way more qualified to have the position he does than plenty of his opponents.
[clear news] clear's favorite food is butter
>>17063650why is he so violent
>>17063652>when you claimed that an exploded thing is reusablei did not claim that, i claimed the starship system is reusable, which it is, and this makes you upset.the only thing your belligerence demonstrates is that you have a baby-rage personal vendetta against spacex and none of your opinions are to be taken seriously. >b-but i have accepted a non-existent concession!great, nobody cares, in the real world, no concession was made, my angry brown friend.'i accept your actual concession that has happened automatically by way of you only using bad-faith arguments.
>>17063657>Tyson's 4-year-old daughter, Exodus, sadly passed away on May 26, 2009, following a tragic accidental strangulation from a treadmill cordbecause he can get away with it
>>17063657He could kill you, he could kill all of us.
So do they even have a landing cam set up?
>>17063648If they're both "accepting", which one of them does the "giving"?
Will flight 15 be the same?
>>17063654>Yeah, the fact that he ONLY talks about SpaceX o algo and never shit talks its competitionWell could you point out a single thing he has said that is wrong about SpaceX then? Or perhaps a single thing he was wrong on about any of the other launch providers you mentioned, perhaps he has praised them with a counterfactual statement? A single instance of the things you claimed above? Anything specific at all? Or you know will you just dodge the question again? In the absence of anything specific could you perhaps point out how him being seemingly 100% correct on all the points you have deemed to provide so far makes him wrong in some nebulous sense that you refuse to specify?>>17063659>i claimed the starship system is reusableSo it has been reused how many times then? Is that number perhaps 0% of the time?I accept your concession btw.
how much time do i have until i gotta get back to my desk to watch
>Falcon 1 is 18You can lewd Falcon 1 now
>>17063669~20 minutes
>>17063666similar but it will have booster catch
>>17063663Hard to say considering they had bunch of different landing places.
>>17063675delusional
>>17063632Probably just to be safe. A starship out of control in orbit aint good I doubt the batteries would last to steer it back after hanging about. I seen a load of ice in the rcs lines too getting ejected so it could be a risk they block and they lose control
>>17063674ありがとうございます
>>17063668>the reusable thing that has displayed all the things necessary for it to be reusable is not reusable because it would hurt my EDSer feelings!good for you, but outside of your delusions, nobody actually cares.starship is now orbital, it can reuse the first stage, as demonstrated by it being caught multiple times now, the 2nd stage catch is analagous and not a considerably different challenge to the first stage.starship actually already works and you are essentially clinging on for dear life to a goalpost that will be turned to ash within the next few years, highly embarrassing for an adult to do, you need to grow up.>i-i acce-ACKi'm sorry that you are not able to accept that you have conceded to me, and i'm sorry that you are now a mindbroken bot going around in circles, i hope you recover from this someday, feel free to continue screeching into the void about how not owned you are.
>>17063686Concession accepted
>>17063665I don't know, I've never seen two bottoms try to fuck before.
>>17063693GARUPAN MENTIONED!!!!!
The subhuman autist having a melty over the most blatant of bait is just insufferable. Autists are not people, never forget that.
>>17063673jarvis, draw a loli falcon1-chan with a big pregnant belly giving birth to an already fully adult-looking starship-chan while clenching her teeth.
>>17063692>n-no!mindbrokensee >>17063686
>>17063496BYD is literally 10x more reliable.
>>17063656Based. Having buttered toast as we speak
so it's landing near Hawaii ?
Purple!
>>17063703I accept your concussion
>>17063697yeah, >>17063692 is having a lot of trouble accepting that he lost, and is now coping by insisting he was merely pretending to be retarded. such a sad sight to see normalfags hit the autist wall, they really can't handle it when someone doesn't play along with their "ironic" persona and just calls them a retard anyway>n-no you don't understand i-i was merely baiting by pretending to be retarded!lol.really shows how superior autists are to normalfags, one, stoic and immovable, the other, extremely emotional and desperate to feel "not owned".
LIVE VIEW BACK IT IS DISINTEGRATING
>>17063711see >>17063686
not the North Pacific after all, huh?>>17063709looks like indian ocean
>>17063639he is tilting
>>17063713It's beautiful
Finally, took forever to get here
>>17063712based baitposter destroyer.
>>17063717
>>17063725Damn, only one and half orbit.
>>170637301-7/8
>>17063730what would be the point of staying longer ?
FLAPS NOW HAVE CONTROL OF VEHICLE
>>17063733Aura
>>17063733They initially wanted to go for 10 hours, so I assume they had a reason. Maybe endurance testing.
>>17063733ask spacex because staying longer was their plan
>>17063733testing how much the propellant boils offthey need to create depots for orbital refilling
Damn is this much faster than normal she is cooking
I wonder if we will see footage from the land
Camera feed is frozen!!!
>>17063750RUD
>>17063750Elon fixed it
>>17063746It's actually higher in altitude at the same speed as on Flight 13, so it should be experiencing less atmosphere
entering peak heating
>>17063754oh damn if I remember right they stressed it on purpose in those
Please Starship be a Floatship
>at this point flaps have control
7 more min until landing burn
Far less sparks this time
wing steel is warping.... again...
No tower catch for the booster?? What the fuck are they doing at that point? This fucking sucks
>>17063767Norminal>>17063766Yes, it's very much better
nice view
>this is how we're collecting le dataOh my fucking god I tune back in and this is the first thing I hear
>Recovery team readyTWO STARSHIPS COMING BACK TO PORT?
Zero catches, waste of fucking time for everyone involved. So happy to wait another 6 month to see more rockets blow up at sea
>>17063772why do you think they are landing it in the ocean at all? retard
my benis is currently nominal
>>17063776it's landing on FCC
>>17063775parachutes would be an idea
THREE GOOD
They are never going to let this thing land on the chopsticks. We are going to watch raptors explode for the next five years while SpaceX slowly regresses in areas of the starship we thought they already mastered. This fucking sucks, I just want to see it become operational already. How many fucking tests does this thing need?
awwww it exploded
oh shit it ble up
FIRE IN THE WATER ANON!!
>explodes
>it's Bac-
*clapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclapclap*
Fully reusable btw
REUSABLE ROCKET
>>17063781>they will never catch the booster>they will never let this thing land on the chopsticks>they will never go orbitalhaven't you retards learned not to make statements like this by now? how much humiliation do you want to feel?
why does he talk like an LLM?
>Guys trust us this would have been a catch, in fact we were 0.005mm off target, we swear next time we'll get it EZ
>>17063793>thing that nobody said
>>17063785Ah not understando
>we'd like to thank the FAA
was it supposed to explode?
They have a recovery team near the splashdown zone so I guess it was supposed to not explode.
i love all the angry EDS seethe, it's gonna be so much fun watching the remaining handful of copes dissapear over the next few years.
cortisol decreasing
good, good
>>17063791That's the thing, they did land on the chopsticks initially. Then they couldn't even make it through the booster reentry without it exploding. At this rate V4 will explode on the launchpad. They never seem to make progress, just run in circles chasing new problems. Everyone sees it
ambatukam
>>17063808>>17063812Yes
are these RCA jacks
>>17063812the recovery team puts up buyoys there and if they are lucky and it doesn't explode, they can tow it backbut its rng because they aren't going to design the ship to survive water landings, its just extra data if it does survive
Well, that was fun. otsukaresama deshita~
>>17063808It's expected.
4 V3 launch attempts and always Raptors failed.
>>17062616Based
>>17063820Yes, they still use vhs in space
Yikes and oof-pilled
Another 100% successful mission for Elon and SpaceXThunderf00t BTFO
>>17063822
>>17063812the recovery teams are always there but they're only set up to recover debris, that's why they had to bring in other ships to recover ship 40
>>17063821>>17063823i see. how long should i expect to hear details for flight 15?
>>17063833Two weeks. Give or take.
>>17063800They've been saying that for years at that point, always boasting about how it lands next to the buoys at the exact predicted GPS coordinates implying they could have caught it if they wanted
>>17063824They'll blame muh vibrations again and then do nothing to fix it for the next flight. And blame ice for the dying booster raptors and spend 3 months redesigning the ice filters for the hundredth time. Neverending cycle
They said that there was footage of booster coming back, has anyone seen anything?
>>17063840Yes, on NSF.
why don't they just put a few parachutes on it and let it down gently into the water?
>>17063840NSF took some like they always do. Check their social media. Almost a soft landing but it clearly was having issues with engines and landed somewhere in between
>>17063845Way too heavy for parachutes
>>17063844>>17063846Cheers, found it on their livestream
>>17063845The parachutes will melt during reentry
>>17063845Parachutes for starship would weight like 5 tonnes and then it gets dunked in the sea and you need to recover it. They looked at an autogyro, helicopter recovery, wings it just ends up adding worthless weight vs letting in land itself which is basically just more fuel/ header tank
Fact: This guy is younger than the Starship program.
alright get your flight 15 predictions in here.I’ll start>early November>booster catch in the flight plan but offshore diverts after a few engine outs>ship goes orbital again, no planned catch, stays in space for full planned duration.
>>17063856are you trying to get us all v&?
>>17063837yes, because that true, what they're not saying is your strawman of>w-we swear next time we'll get itbecause that's got nothing to do with the accuracy of the landing. why does that make you so upset?
>>17063816>they did land on the chopsticksand they will do so again, and this makes you angry for some reason.>they never seem to make progressyes, they do, today was yet more progress, they went from nothing to one of the most impossibly difficult vehicles ever built in just a few short years.>everyone sees itno, that's just your particular delusion.
>>17063856no, he's not, that's wrong.
>>17063860Reasonable.
we did it reddit!
>>17063893/qa/ lost, sharty lost.
>>17063860> planned repeat of flight 14> raptors work perfectly this time> TPS randomly burns through during reentry and ship breaks upThe Starship cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To fix one system, another of equal value must be broken. That is SpaceX's First Law of Equivalent Exchange.
>>17063860Mid October. Straight to orbit, followed by a booster catch attempt.
Fiery but 100% reusable upper stage as they say around these parts.
>>17063962>angry, passive-aggressive post seething about today's successlol, someone's still bootyblasted.
>>17063962go back to watching nigger hooting, sweaty
>>17063593Great if accurate
>>17063820Similar looking strain relief connectors but I'd assume they're something custom. There's probably a locking screw or clip in that bar to keep them from coming loose.
>>17063721Underrated post
>>17064105Finally, someone cleaned up all the cum
>>17063657N
>>17063718>he is tiltingLmao boomer spotted
>>17063619no child, it is you that is seethingenjoy prison stalker
>>17064177you died doing this
>>17063303>Polyus satellite: 80.000 KGDo you really think it make sense to include the entire upper stage (wet) as payload?If so, the list first gets a lot longer, as we include:Buran (~75t + payload)All Saturn V (S-IVB: 120.5t)All Falcon 9 & Heavy (F9B5 2nd stage: 111.5t)All Vulcan Centaur (Centaur V: 54t + dry mass)...and so on.And then gets very short indeed, once we remember to count Starship the same way for about 1600t.But this is all very silly. Earlier vs later staging, and fewer vs more stages, makes a huge difference in upper stage wet mass for the same (real) payload to the same orbit; including it just makes for a bad metric of comparison. I appreciate that we don't have information on Polyus's dry/on-orbit mass, but having numbers doesn't make a bad metric good.
>>17064257>polyus payload figure includes upper stagewasn't aware of that, i'd exclude it if i had known.
