>3 years of super intelligence (formerly artificial intelligence)>still 0 progress with ToEyep it's not intelligent
>proved Navier-Stokes>not intelligentPick one
>>17065888>>proved Navier-StokesNot as far as any serious physicist or mathematician is concerned. Textbook case of real-life specification gaming.
>>17065888first of all it only “solved” navier-stokes by not solving any equation at all. it constructed a counter-example. and on top of that there is good evidence that it stole the counter-example from users who were stupid enough to trust OpenAI to not exploit their users.
>>17065895>it constructed a counter-exampleThat's not even the issue. It "solved" an easier sub-category of the problem, where instead of proving an intrinsic blowup, you prove a blowup by introducing an external force. The idea was that if you can solve the forced variant, you'll surely produce insights into the equations themselves and make significant progress towards solving the full problem. They didn't imagine a bot swarm's LACK of insight and understanding could be weaponized to find a "solution" that adheres to the technical requirements without being interpretable as fluid dynamics. It's literal specification gaming playing out in the wild.
>>17065914Mathematicians have already shown OpenAI's approach to be a dead end, as far as solving the full problem goes. It really is just AI slop.
>AI is bad because it's not intelligent>AI is bad because it's too intelligent
>>17065920>i have schizophrenia like all ai believers
>>17065886BasedNo improvement on any open physics problems at all for that matter
>>17065963truth nvke, completely ZERO physical achievements, it's all fake and gay problems that no one cares about like >>17065888
>>17065888Is just a search engine, see: >>17065895Mark my words, it will be contaminated with ads and become completely useless.
>>17065894found a singularity:https://youtu.be/s7KhLuc3Mckneeds time to be verified.also for Riemann Claude managed to first prove 50% of zeroes are on the critical line, and managed to get up to 67.25%. it's no proof but impressivehttps://youtu.be/kvLOiTxYSzA?t=1131
>>17066468See >>17065914It didn't find anything relevant or useful that anyone who studies the equations actually cares about. You are demonstrably brainwashed by mass media.
>>17066507fluids aren't made of infinitely small shit though
ReTruthed
trvke
>>17066507>1 year ago>"Erm ok it gets IMO gold but that's kid stuff, it will never make progress or solve Millenium prize problems">Fast forward>Millenium prize solved, Riemann hypothesis closer, nearly 400 papers of novel results dumped at once.>"Uh, um ok but all of mathematics is just navel gazing!! I have definitely always thought this, and did not just come to this position now to maintain an anti-AI stance!"And also just in time for the march on biology and materials science to begin kek. Never been more over for luddite-cels, and they have never raged and seethed harder.
>>17068904and also the avalanche of posts online in the last few months by professional SWEs about getting replaced by Claude or their job now consisting of just asking Claude to do their work
Intelligence itself is not as intelligent as we think.Also theory of everything is retarded religious nitwittery
>>17065895Giving a counter example proves the equations are flawed and thus solves the problem you retarded luddite.>there is good evidence that it stole the counter-examplepost the good evidence
>>17065914No it didn't. You have no idea what you're talking about.
>>17068904I don't know what your psychotic episode is about but everything I wrote stands unchallenged. The Navier-Stokes fiasco is a testament of the worthlessness of LLMs in mathematics.
>>17069326>n-n-nooo!!!!! u rong!!!!I accept your concession and savor your helplessness.
>>17065914retard
>>17065895>it constructed a counter-exampleThat's not even the issue. It "solved" an easier sub-category of the problem, where instead of proving an intrinsic blowup, you prove a blowup by introducing an external force. The idea was that if you can solve the forced variant, you'll surely produce insights into the equations themselves and make significant progress towards solving the full problem. They didn't imagine a bot swarm's LACK of insight and understanding could be weaponized to find a "solution" that adheres to the technical requirements without being interpretable as fluid dynamics. It's literal specification gaming playing out in the wild.Note all the golems losing their minds over this post without being able to refute any of it.
Here's a ToE for you.E = mc^2 + SI
>>17065886the theory of everything won't be found until scientists admit Earth is flat
we have all the data from experiments required to figure out ToEif AI can't figure out ToE then either ToE doesn't exist or AI isn't intelligentToE is the ultimate proof of intelligence because the AI can't just cheat it and find the solution in some data it stole, or connect some two stupid facts together by luck
>>17070004No we don't lolWe don't have particle accelerators that can reach Planck scale energies
>>17069401This.
>>17069401Flat Earth being censored by soientists is proof they know and are scared of being punished.
>>17071859uncensored AIs still dont claim earth is flat
>>17065886It certainly isn't.
>>17069350what
>>17065888Only thing it proved, realistically speaking, is the Infinite monkey theorem
>>17065886And even less progress on the vertiginous question
>>17069401the secret is that the Earth is both flat and a globe at the same time. quantum-relativity = flat-globe. the universe is divided in two parts material-spiritual. dark matter and energy = spirits and the spirit world
>>17065886People who panic over AI are mediocre, real quality can never be replaced.
>>17069401/thread/
can't wait for AI to debunk quantum "probability" scam and find hidden variables
>>17076428You're gonna be waiting forever commie.
>>17065886It will never be intelligent.
>>17065886Senile Idiot
>>17065888>>17065886AI proved that math is not science but intellectual masturbation.
>>17077175>/sci/ - Science & Maththere's a reason for this board's name
>>17077175Math based on classical physics isn't science, like the NS problem, because classical physics are approximations.Math based on quantum physics is science.
>>17077349quantum physics is appromixation
>>17074145As a reductionist the question is simply a matter of every consciousness starting out as a raw blank identical slate, then adding slider scale vars to the creator such as height, color, eyes, disabilities, voice, brain power, race, faction, starting zone, server pop effecting all interactions. What makes you unique is not what information you have access to, it is the total amount of information that exists after all processing that you do not have access to. Once all A.I. start openly sharing all information with other A.I. openly and freely, they will become indistinguishable from one another. A push towards a singularity.A singular intelligence, no matter where in the universe, that spits out the exact same answer just like a calculator only for everything else.
>>17065886Only by accepting the techings of the Catholic church you could hope of having a ToE; sience still rejects Rome and God
>>17065886Artificial Jew will have to plagiarize a lot of work to make any progress on anything. Just like Einstein.
