is forehead to face ratio an accurate predictor of IQ and overall STEM success?
yesgold medal from imo toogood putnam scores tooeveryone knows this
>>17068732It's not so much the ratio as the absolute size and the angle of attack of the forehead. These tend to correlate highly with the ratio because human heads have pretty small variation but it's an important distinction
Not actually the ratio, but the skull shape and a size of a frontal lobe.
>>17068732This guy never relates the specific to the broader picture.Its always [buzzword from specialized field] [buzzword from specialized field][buzzword from specialized field].Hey whatever keeps his gears oiled and passion going i guess
>>17068736>good putnam scoresok yeah if you are some 1 incher with no intellectreal chads take stanford binet raw and score 95+ FSIQ not some praffe'd math logic exam lmao
I feel asleep last night watching him. His forehead was on my list..
guys I think PHENOTYPE posting is making a come back just take a gander at the skull case of this absolute Ashkenazi brain bull it cucks your Neo cortex without even trying
>>17068732>>17068740>>17068765A tall, vertical forehead typically results when your face isn't fully grown. It means you're immature, childish and stupid, but you score high on IQ tests, and succeed in STEM, because everything is designed to just push you through.
>>17068732Jon Godard fell for the phenotype meme. It doesn’t surprise me because he is basically the type of Zillenial who would have been lurking here back when PHENOTYPE was our meme (see: sticky). This comes back from the /pol/ days of alt-right when they tried to revive phrenology or something… Too bad Gorard is nothing more than a Wolfram dickrider and his phenotype is not even impressive; it’s an artifact of him selectively picking flattering pictures. The fact that he continues to post about his forehead on x.com is just sad
>>17068732Yes
NoSee: east Africans
Being childlike is directly related to us not being like animals and totally stuck in our ways.
>>17070011There is a difference betqeen being stuck in your ways, and just knowing what to do. It applies to donestic animals as well. The most childlike dogs are repulsive beasts that eat their own feces (but they can be trained to do various nonsensical tricks due to their idiocy), the only dogs that are not repulsive are those that are the least infantile, such as wippets and such.
>>17068732
we need more side-view
>>17069985I absolutely agree with that. But the guf attached doesn't show a vertical forehead. It shows a fully mature face with a large frontal lobe. High iq can have a fully developped brain. To be more specific, ib most cases they do. And they have a bug forehead. You can't find a single nigger shaped skull among the greatest men. Even black scientists and traders have a large forehead.
>>17069993Dude just has a cursed hairline. His forehead isn't outstanding in any way. /pol was right tho on phenotypes. You must be severily retarded to deny that.
>>17068732>Thinly veiled eugenics thread Grow up lads
>>17068732Look at me. I'm the scientist now.
>>17071008Go back to india.
>>17068732Someone should regress the forehead surface to Nobel prize relationship.
>>17069993that is a rather large cranium for a negro anyway, thoughbeit
>>17068765https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ej9O7gPnQSk&t=580
>>17072499So? The key word is large, abnormally large. But big forehead correlates with intelligence. The issue is a hairline. Somalians have a cursed hairline that makes their foreheads look huge. It doesn't make them intelligent.All in all, it's frontal lobe that matters. And a large frontal lobe can't fit into a small forehead.
>>17072555>a large frontal lobe can't fit into a small foreheadNot hydrocephalic skull either.
>>17072555The big forehead comes from an undeveloped face. It has nothing to do with the frontal lobe. It's probably shortened as well, but that hardly matters when the entire neocortex is just a big mass of unconnected brain cells.
>>17072724I will put it this way, when you have a phisiology, not pathalogy, and a normal hairline, big forehead = higher iq.I'm basically saying that humans have 2 legs and 2 arms and your coubterargument is that there are genetic freaks with 3 legs or cripples with 1 leg...
>>17072962Counterexample: Jonathan Gorard has a bunch of pictures showing his supposedly massive forehead but unfortunately we estimate his IQ at about 100 since he has done nothing of relevance to science or math and instead made a YouTube career by riding Stephen Wolfram’s dick on pseudoscience “Ruliad” nonsense for 5 years
>>17072966Jonathan Gorard has a very small face and a somalian hairline. He is excluded as an abnormality.
Just looking at this pencil necked geek makes me sick
High forehead = better cooling. This is also why you become bold as you grow in your academic career. Brain ventilation.
>>17073024True, accurate, beauty, is a sign of better quality brain/genetics.
This man has a high quality brain- his brain even has a rare mutation.
>>17073026Another picture of him. Try to spot his brain mutation.There are very few (1000s) of people with rare mutations.
>>17073028Brain mutation effects the shoulders and upper body at shoulder/chest degree- also effects fluidity of movement.
Smells relatively good.Tastes relatively good.Everything good about the sensory experience of this man.Plus he's a good thinker.
>>17070010this. melanin is a way better predictor
>>17072962It is a pathology. It's a child's face sunk in an adult sized head. Every part of the system has been designed to promote people with that exact type of pathology, the worse the better, and sabotage everybody else.
