What is the scientific explanation for paid actors flooding the board as Q3 reports are looming over silicon valley, having to report negative RoIs, and the NS """proof""" crumbling in real time? How does one model the astroturfers pivoting from "muh lean" to "peer review doesn't matter, ai is smarter than humans"?
>>17073814Pure cohencidence, scientifically speaking.
>>17073814Correct
>>17073814I think if you look into the Economic literature, you can explain this phenomenon within the Economic understanding of “Ponzi schemes”. A Ponzi scheme, in which investors’ funds are not invested in assets that grow in value, can continue to attract additional investors by fraudulent practices of overstating the rate of return, provided that the rate of new investments satisfies the need for capital to pay out asset holders who choose to divest. A famous example of this is Bernie Madoff
>>17073814Thread has nothing to do with sci. Also noone is flooding this dead board with anything stop coping
>>17074459>not scithere are many posts that aren't science on this board and stranglely pro ai
>>17074533found the mathie. are you ok?
>>17074535>mathie>oct 6ah yes, very organic memes, fellow website user.
What is the best way to model a monotonically decreasing function?
>>17074299Very interesting!
do black swans eat frogs?
