>"artificial intelligence">look inside>it's just a search engine with extra steps
dunno man, it coded shit faster for me. and better.it's like I manually plow my field or I use a tractor. with a tractor I do it faster with less effort. that's a win in my book
>>17074235>OP>look inside>its just a fag with extra steps
>>17074235It’s a search engine, stuff in a matrix!And covered in nacho cheese.
>>17074235>intelligence is just pattern recognitionYes, and clearly you are not intelligent enough yet to recognize you yourself is also running on this same pattern.
>>17074235>AI is useless junk>AI will take over and kill us allPick one
>>17074241because you aren't making anything new, youre just rehashing stuff other people already made
>>17074235No, its not just a search engine, it doesn't just search through an index of content to find matches, it is at least an upgrade to a context engine because it not only searches through the content index, but is able to compare all the content on the fly to provide helpful context to the content based on statistical calculations and historical uses of the content.>>17074241And an AI is more like an upgrade to your tractor so it automatically swaps out its attachments based on the conditions it detects.
>>17074248>He says this with a millennial reaction image from millennialslop movieThose shekels are paying off, don't they?
>>17074329It does. Stop lying to yourself.
>>17074241> and betterYou are a fraud.
>>17074284
>>17074343No, I clearly explained additional measures beyond the scope of engines that just do searching and sorting, but since you are obviously so low functioning you can't even grasp the answer, no amount of context will make you less retarded, so you will never comprehend the difference between indexed key word search versus comprehensive contextualization, so as far as you can tell, your mom's just a search engine given she is the one who finds your tendies and brings them to your room for you.
>>17074346>you have to have a high IQ to understand Rick and Mortylol, lmao even
Do you trust a system built by people who instituted laws fundamentally shaping how these ai react that make white people look worse and forbade you from saying mean words about jews?
>>17074352He's right your stupid retard. You're essentially asking a librarian in a library help desk for a book on cutting your dick off and just getting the first medical book on sexual anatomical surgery you find vs the librarian manually fetching you the "For Dummies" version with the page and outline section for a moron like yourself.
>>17074367I'm not white so yes
>it is at least an upgrade to a context engine because it not only searches through the content index, but is able to compare all the content on the fly to provide helpful context to the content based on statistical calculations and historical uses of the content.
>it's just a search engine with extra steps
>Yes, and clearly you are not intelligent enough yet to recognize you yourself is also running on this same pattern.
>>17074405Yes that is what allows it to synthesize novel data based on its own contextualization instead of just reproducing exactly what is in the search array like a search engine.>>17074406Extra capabilities and utility, not extra "steps" whatever that means. So ai is a search engine with "extra steps" in the same way an airplane is just a wagon with "extra steps".
>>17074409You realize you're hallucinating just like your mindless chat bot, right? It's word salad.
>>17074410No, I realize you are a barely literate retard who can't parse together most sentences you encounter let alone form your own sentence that justify your nonsequitur screeching.
>>17074419Look, I get it. You feel the chatbot is somehow different from a search engine because the results are dynamic and you heard it has something to do with "context". And that's about as far as your actual knowledge goes. But instead of realizing you don't understand shit, your broken Broca's area fires up and goes like:>ah, of course, it's just like a smegmato-statistical metacontextual search array engine based on historical analysis, not a regular search engineWhich somehow makes you feel less technologically illiterate. You're never gonna ask yourself "what the fuck am I even trying to say here?" because metacognition isn't your strong suit.
>>17074422Thanks for providing more evidence that you are barely literate. But you clearly still don't understand that search engines only search through existing text, they don't generate new text based on context.>You're never gonna ask yourself "what the fuck am I even trying to say here?" No, you are never going to ask what someone means by what they say, you are just going to search through your database of insults and start calling people chatbots or NPCs or whatever other low effort buzzword is popular this week because you are low functioning with very limited vocabulary capabilities.
>>17074425>search engines only search through existing text, they don't generate new text based on context.What did I just say?>>17074422>You feel the chatbot is somehow different from a search engine because the results are dynamic and you heard it has something to do with "context". And that's about as far as your actual knowledge goes.Pretty funny.
>>17074426>What did I just say?Retarded head in sand nonsense.>dynamicSearch engine results are also dynamic based on number of searches, location, time of day and clicks, but chatbot synthesis is completely ad libbed, it isn't just pulling something from a search, it is generating new information based on the context of the search and the information in the data set.
>>17074433>Retarded head in sand nonsense.But it's literally the same thing you said.>Search engine results are also dynamic based on number of searches, location, time of day and clicksSo you're saying it synthesizes novel outputs based on context? Wow. >muh LLM is generating new informationIt's definitely, 100% not doing that. If you weren't technologically and scientifically illiterate, you'd have known it can't do that in principle.
>>17074434>But it's literally the same thing you said.No its not and I just explained why, dynamic is not the same bar as generated from scratch.So you're saying you finally understand that it is doing something search engines can't do. Finally.>It's definitely, 100% not doing thatIt definitely is. That is why all those new novel papers about old math problems were dumped onto the public to scour and debate.
>>17074434>>17074440now kiss
>>17074440>dynamic is not the same bar as generated from scratch.Your chatbot is not generating anything from scratch.>It definitely isYou're a mongoloid for believing this and it's not even up for debate. A LLM alone can't generate new information.
>>17074447>Your chatbot is not generating anything from scratch.It is. Otherwise you are claiming that no new words have ever been generated since the invention of the alphabet since every possible word is just a permutation of letters from the alphabet.>A LLM alone can't generate new information.Then why is its output novel instead of exactly copy pasted directly from the search index like a search engine?
>>17074460I see you've degenerated into full-blown psychosis.
>>17074461I see you have decided to concede without admitting concession and your projected mental illness will compel you to keep replying even though nobody is going to read your further confessions.
>>17074447>A LLM alone can't generate new information.Prove this statement. So that we can see if you have any clue what you are talking about.
>>17074464You're just babbling incoherently. Your LLM is not generating anything from scratch and it's not producing new information. These are two basic facts that no one disputes except for mathematically and technically illiterate brown insects like you. They are not up for debate.
>>17074466>Prove this statement.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_processing_inequalityThe proof is at the bottom of the page. Just take your L and sit back down in the dunce corner.
>>17074469So the alphabet can't contain any more information than the alphabet, its just a string of letters that can't be rearranged in novel ways to create new words that mean something other than the alphabet?
>>17074471>psychotic word saladWipe the foam off your mouth, retard.
>>17074474Just take your L and sit back down in the dunce corner. The alphabet can be used to generate new information that isn't just the alphabet.
>The alphabet can be used to generate new information that isn't just the alphabet.
>>17074476Yes, you are currently rearranging letters of the alphabet to generate information that isn't part of the alphabet itself.
>>17074477>you are currently rearranging letters of the alphabet to generate information that isn't part of the alphabet itself.You know what? Sure. Now tell me, what new information have I generated? Be specific.
>>17074479That you are retarded and you don't even know that new words can be made by making novel permutations of letters in the alphabet.
>>17074481How come asking you a simple question about your statement completely derails you? You said I was generating new information. What new information did I generate? What did it pertain to?
>>17074447>A LLM alone can't generate new informationThen what exactly is happening when an LLM is hallucinating if it isn't creating new factually false information as a result of processing disorders?
>>17074483How come giving you answers to your questions makes you have a complete breakdown? I told you what new information you have provided to the thread, just because it isn't flattering doesn't mean it isn't new.
>>17074484>Then what exactly is happening when an LLM is hallucinatingA probability distribution that encodes a fixed amount of information is being sampled, producing no new information, unless by "new information" you mean finding out what particular token slop sequence the PRNG will produce this time, rather than "new information" of the kind you need to train a model in the first place.
>>17074485>I told you what new information you have provided to the threadFull-blown psychotic delusion. Moving on. Notice how your mental illness forces you to reply to me again even though nothing you shit out will be read from this point on. :^)
>>17074487>producing no new information,Then why doesn't it match reality, if it isn't new, then shouldn't it match some information that comes from reality instead of new nonsense information that was generated by a faulty algorithm or input?>the kind you need to train a model in the first place.So if you train an AI on another AI's hallucinations, it will exactly match the real training data since there is no new information except what came from the real information?
>>17074489>Then why doesn't it match realityWhy should it match reality? >So if you train an AI on another AI's hallucinations, it will exactly match the real training data since there is no new information except what came from the real information?No, it will degrade because not only are you failing to generate new information, but also losing existing information.
>>17074491>Why should it match reality?Because if it can't generated new information, the information it outputs must have come from reality.>losing existing information.So x-y isn't a new number, you can't make new information by reduction, only addition, there can't be words for hairless or pigmentless animals, you can only add features even though no new ideas can be added with new words?
>>17074495>the psychotic brown sub-animal is samefagging
>>17074498>samefaggingAnother term you clearly don't understand.
Protip: if you're gonna blatantly samefag, at least try coming at it from a different angle instead of regurgitating the same incoherent nonsense. I know you think you're generating "new information" because you're using a different combination of words to express the exact same mental retardation, but it's actually nothing new and I can tell it's just you begging for another (You).
>>17074515Nope there can't be a different combination of words, you can't make new words with an alphabet, you can only have alphabet, there is no information besides alphabet in an alphabet, so its pointless to try to rearrange letters.
>retarded monkey drops the act and starts repeating itself verbatimlol
>>17074525>alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabet alphabetalphabet
>i mindbroke it
