As obvious as it has always been, we didn't put our finger on it yet. Scientific evidence (controlled environment and scientific method) were come up with for one key reason (and now it all makes sense). The inventors of controlled environments and the scientific method had definitely settled upon a foundational agreement, and although that agreement is the cornerstone of our world today it is only so much. I began thinking about this in 2012 and I haven't yet put my finger on what exactly was going on until now. The scientific method and controlled environment have been designed intentionally to never prove the spiritual/paranormal. I know it's quite an accusation but I have tried different approaches and spoken to AI and it is actually not difficult to convince a human in other different ways that the emperical evidence approach altogether like they used to in ancient days when they could understand esoterism. What I'm saying is that the spiritual and paranormal world has been hiden from us all in a human rights crime against our best interests. And until we come up with a new way to test concepts we will never be able to comprehend reality on the full scale that is out there. Especially mental health.
>>17075686>The scientific method and controlled environment have been designed intentionally to never prove the spiritual/paranormal.That's because there is nothing to prove. It's all semantics.The scientific method is merely to test whether if you do "x" you get "y", repeatly. If you describe resulted models in spiritual languages then suddenly you just "proved" the paranormal.I'll demonstrate: Gravity is not a force it's a spirit, this spirit behaves like [insert all known physics about gravity]. You ask if it's a spirit why can't it choose to do otherwise? Well maybe it can but choose not to, and if enough new evidence starts to show up that it does, we'll update our mode..err I mean grimoires.At the end of the day, it doesn't matter what language you use, if you do "x" and you don't get "y", that's a fail /sci/ or /x/.
>>17075686The rambling nature of this post and the facts that your attempt at a point is buried somewhere in the middle of all this crap makes me seriously question your mental health.To address your point:>The scientific method and controlled environment have been designed intentionally to never prove the spiritual/paranormalSo what do you actually mean by this? If the spiritual/paranormal were testable in a scientific manner, then they would be science.Now what's the alternative? Do these things to not have a substance that can be measured materially?Do they not have a mind or intents which can be studied through psychology?Do they not have a measurable reaction to a given action?If all of the above, in what sense can they even be said to exist at all?
>>17075707This commands gravity brah.>>17075745Well think about in your head, you see it once and you speak. And its the same in life, you see it once and it's finished. So copying the little things life it to test if everything always does the same is just a way to try see what had happened, it is not a way to see what to do.
>>17075794You are not saying anything coherent.
>>17075794>Empiricism is just a way to try see what had happened, it is not a way to see what to do.And just exactly what is the way to see what to do?Because it doesn't matter whether it's known science or your schizo model that is creating reality, everybody is still postulating some "x" is creating "y". And if you want to change future "y", you have to change some present "x". And whatever the prediction is, it's validated by incoming experiences, aka your "what had happened".At the end of the day, everything is still empirical in nature. There is no escaping the scientific method.
>>17075859A narrative is the answer, a fictional Archetype/Myth a schizo delusion portal a non chaotic believe like significance of self compared to a speck in the universe an event where conciousness creates reality a protagonist.
