What's the new date for mass vaxxie death? Or have they finally quietly swept that under the rug with their hundreds of other failed predictions?

two more weeks.

This is the most embarrassing thing ever posted to this site.

>>17077211
this is whats happening to anti vaxxers

>>17077211
red deer was just a psyop to distract from Yukari Poster’s prediction of Optimizedbro harnessing infinity-hat to unlock the Mandelbaurian PHENOTYPE ice sun proof of 0.999… != 1

What was that covid vaccine thing? the 5G signals downloading GPT7 into your bloodstream if you had the vaccine and causing you to turn into a robot or some crazy shit?

>>17077211
Antivax is the most obvious psyop ever.
>design viruses meant to cull the population
>release a vaccine
>flood social media with disinfo to scare brave independent minded people away from the vaccines
>they succumb to the virus while docile vaxxie sheep prevail

>>17077240
covid was based because it largely killed off obese trump voters

>>17077238
lmao I miss these guys so much

>>17077242
you lost tranny

>>17077240
>viruses meant to cull the population
ah yes, the super virus that gives you a mild 30 hour cold lmao
a virus so potent they had to inflate death toll numbers using bogus PCR results to make influenza deaths count as muh cold
then charge for a gene treatment that does literally nothing and then stop all production because this thing is better at treating dog cancer

>>17077279
you realize different people react differently to the same virus right?

>>17077263
the good old days. why did those days ever have to go? (queue Stevie Wonder soundtrack: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v3Lu7l8nZMw )

File: IMG_3855.jpg (45 KB, 524x481)

45 KB JPG

>>17077211
>still recommended for pregnant women
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UQYTb9DwKjQ&ra=m

>>17077211
No reasonable study ever said that, vaxed lost something like 5 years of life expectancy and excess deaths will stay elevated thanks to that, they aren't literally going to "drop dead" on the spot.

>>17077293
The vax was a farming operation and drug trial.
It killed a lot of people early on but the real goal was creating a lot of sick ppeople with chronic health conditions dependent on expensive drugs.

>>17077293
2 more weeks I guess

>>17077240
>independent minded people
>convinced to kill themselves by a few schizoposts on social media
?

>>17077360
It already happened years ago anon.

>>17077468
Yes yes I'm going to die soon (2 weeks)

>>17077211
>>17077214
>>17077216
>>17077217
>>17077237
>>17077239
>>17077240
>>17077281
>>17077360
deaths are still elevated (in highly vaccinated countries)
https://youtu.be/OlBvymt5bAs

not to mention infertility
https://youtu.be/jBOQeFADyH8

good luck clotshotted

>>17077484
I don't think you understand what life expectancy means.

>>17077499
His awakening was impressive to see. just skirting the limits of getting cancelled for speaking the blatant truth

I never got the jab, never got the 'vid either.
What superpower do I gain compared to the jabbers?

>>17077560
your cum is now super tasty to demons
keep it inside or else

>>17077240
>retard thinks compromising your immune system is le correct protocol because science says o algo

>>17077499
Clotters will not respond to this post in good faith.

>>17077499
>click the source link
>retracted article

>>17077691
>The journal was alerted to concerns about quality, originality and messaging in this research paper. The journal published an expression of concern2 to explain that the research does not investigate or establish a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and mortality. The authors’ institution issued a press release on 11 June 2024 confirming they would investigate the work.

academic censorship, they didn't like the conclusions and threatened their careers

imagine the reaction if people were informed covid shots were literally killing them

>>17077691
>The cause that led to the filing both the Request and the Complaint was the publication of manuscript describing the extent of excess mortality since the Covid-19 pandemic in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Several of the authors of this article were (partly) affiliated with the Princess Máxima Center at the time of publication. The article caused much commotion because it may suggest that there is a link between excess mortality and vaccinations.

again, they didn't like the conclusions

> The CWI investigated the case using the guiding principles laid out in the Dutch Code of Conduct for Scientific Integrity (hereafter: Code of Conduct). In doing so, the CWI requested an external expert to provide an independent opinion on the case and to draw up a report based on her findings. Based on the expert report, the CWI concludes the following:

> The study analyzes the level of excess mortality in the 2020-2023 period in the Western World, but no research was conducted to actively investigate the possible causes of excess mortality. It is not an explanatory study, but merely a quantification of the excess
mortality. That excess mortality occurred, however, was known and not newsworthy.

Really? Because the media went really quiet compared to the covid period. And what's the problem of doing correlations now?

> Despite the fact that the authors do not investigate the causes for excess mortality, the introduction and discussion of the article are largely focused on how to explain the excess
mortality. In discussing possible causes, the article pays disproportionate attention to the possibility that introduction of corona measures and vaccination might have caused excess mortality, whilst largely ignoring alternative explanations

So when all the other "alternative explanations" authors do it they don't get any academic censorship on their asses, but since they've correlated deaths with vaccines and lockdowns they're guilty

>>17077691
> The article misleadingly and unilaterally cites literature that supports its own arguments.

What else would they quote? Literature that has nothing to do with their statements?

> Important, relevant literature that supports alternative views, interpretations and theories
is not discussed, or is discussed far too little.

A bit hypocritical about complaining about lack of discussion and alternative views when these people don't even allow wrongthinking research to be published

> The CWI concludes that the authors' actions do not qualify as scientific misconduct, since no evidence was found of malicious intent, fabrication or falsification of data, or plagiarism. However,
14 of the 21 standards of the Code of Conduct were violated, and the committee therefore
qualified the actions of one of the authors as questionable behavior, and the actions of another author as a shortcoming. This conclusion was reached using the weighing criteria as explained in Chapter 5 of the Code of Conduct. Factors that weighed in the judgement were the high degree of non-compliance with the code of conduct; the negative effect on confidence in science;

So they judge science by the effect it has on the "confidence" on it? What the fuck is this, a cult?

> the negative impact on society

Knowing the truth about something people were almost forced to be injected with would have a negative impact to society?

>>17077691
>>17077214
>>17077216
>>17077217
>>17077237
>>17077238
>>17077239
>>17077240
>>17077360
don't worry there's more
https://youtu.be/eVcXT4jhy5I

>QoVAX SET Statewide program evaluating COVID-19 vaccine safety and long-term efficacy

>The Queensland COVID-19 Vaccination Safety and Efficacy Statewide Study (QoVAX SET) was a large-scale, population-based research initiative in Queensland, Australia. It was designed to evaluate the safety, immunity, and long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered across the region.

>The program compiled a massive repository containing over 10,000 participants, 100,000+ biospecimens, and 11+ million data points, representing 86% of Queensland postcodes

>In mid-2023, Queensland Health abruptly withdrew all funding for the QoVAX SET research program. This unexpected defunding brought an early halt to the project just two years after it began, causing significant public and academic debate

>The decision to end the $20 million program was announced suddenly by Queensland Health. Recruitment for the study had successfully finished in September 2022, but funding officially ceased in June 2023. The abrupt decision reportedly surprised both the principal investigators and the thousands of participating citizens, as no prior consultation took place.

>Following the defunding, the program faced severe structural disruptions:

>Biosample Destruction Plans: Operational directives ordered the destruction of the collected biological samples within a year.

>Data Quarantining: Longitudinal health data tracking how participants utilized medical services over time was quarantined, preventing researchers from conducting ongoing analysis.

what's going on here exactly?

>>17077240
>da sheeeeep

>>17077725
so we've gone from
>vaxxie die off coming soon
to
>noooo not the heckin biosamples
lol

>>17077514
>60 more years
Talking about moving goalposts

>>17077293
>just 50 more years

>>17077940
45 for you if you took the vax.

File: Laughing-Girls-meme-2.jpg (45 KB, 449x401)

45 KB JPG

>>17077293
>uhm acsksaully you vaxxies don't understand all the posts made in 2021 like the OP weren't acsksaully literal they were metaphorical you're still going to die! you are the dumb ones haha!
these elaborate multiyear long ruses, i can't take them!

>>17078033
Losing several years of life expectancy isn't exactly nothing. I don't know why you think schizo posts are somehow indicative of science. You had equal amount of people screeching about how covid would kill everyone when in truth the first studied showed that the vax was more dangerous than the disease and that was before the long term effects were found.

>>17078090
>Losing several years of life expectancy isn't exactly nothing.
according to what? you're only saying this because you've been BTFO so many times on your "mass vaxxie death" date predictions arriving and never happening that now the only cope you have left is to say "you're going to die, just an indeterminate amount of time sooner than if you hadn't had the vax!"

>the vax was more dangerous than the disease
STILL waiting on a viable reputable source on this

>>17077217
Or it was just someone bored and wanted to test their skills at the whole ‘creative writing’ thing

>>17078097
>STILL waiting on a viable reputable source on this
people died because of the vaccine
https://revistaoeste.com/brasil/bruno-graf-morreu-devido-a-reacao-da-vacina-da-astrazeneca-informa-boletim/

if you didn't die from covid, that automatically makes yhe vaccine more dangerous than the virus because then there's still the risk you could die from it

use whatever is left from your brain after the clotshots

>>17078102
>one person died from an adverse reaction from tylenol THAT MEANS TYLENOL IS DEADLY AND WILL KILL THE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THAT TAKE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and i'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here because i'm not translating/reading that. you're a swarthy hue so i can't be too hard on you; you have a double digit IQ and actually think these kinds of cherrypicks are actually of serious persuasion.

anyway, come back when you're actually serious.

>>17078097
Again you are using schizo posting as evidence vs scientific papers on the topic. You can flip your post around entirely by pointing out how many times you have been BTFOd on your "covid is dealy take your vax" prediction never happening and how you are coping that people without the vax are going to die any day now from covid XXY. It's frankly ridiculous and you won't get more out of me if that's how you interact with the topic.

>>17077725
You have autism, and not the genius useful kind is what's going on here my nigga

Why did they pull the plug on the QoVAX study and nuke the samples?

personally I blame trump and his budget cuts

>>17077649
My immune system never compromises. it only gives commands.

>>17078102
This is a perfect troll. It is quite possibly the most extremely idiotic thing someone could ever write, it's so stupid that people *have* to take you seriously.

Walking (at all) is more dangerous than skydiving without a parachute for anyone that hasn't yet died, because people have died while walking and the person who bounced off the ground survived.

As long as you're alive, literally any activity you've ever done is less dangerous than any activity that has killed someone before.

>>17077211
that's 260 times 2 more weeks, but what's really frightening is... how many more sets of 2 more weeks do we baxies have left?

>>17078102
>if you didn't die from covid
>if
the flaw here is palpable. if you didn't go through your windshield, that automatically makes seatbelts more dangerous than no seatbelts. if you didn't get an std that automatically makes condoms more unsafe than using condoms.

notwithstanding, death is not the only bad thing to arise from catching covid.

>>17078102
I just cant understand how mentally disabled people like you figure out how to operate a computer and then write nonsense on 4chan. You can hardly be classified as a sentient being.