Don't know how else to say, while philosophizing 100% of credibility of information is bluntly isn't there. It's a constant. For Informational Era this is ridiculous. Physics try to solve it, yes, but their numbers are so small.Also, while knowing this, not confident people are respectable, but critical ones. And computers may never know something for sure- they can't check information, there is no one inside to do it, any AI doesn't have consciousness.
>>17078077The Frogs made more sense. I miss the old /sci/.
>>17078082It's just a random pic. I just had to include Descartes here somehow.
ITT: OP thinks. Not.Hilarity ensues.
>>17078093One can say there is never an assured drunk person. Does this ring better?
>>17078093I can rhyme it:Never a proofFor drunken man
100%, Cool, don't bother me further, better things to do.
>>17078082This.Bring. Them. Back.
