>>17080518
you dont. just keep following the cause and effect chain.

>When do you stop infinite recursion?
When you accept circularity or settle down on some axioms

>>17080518
Traditionally, when you get bored of recursion the great thinkers of history would decide the exact point they got frustrated is the point where religion is the answer. The "cause of stuff that I don't care to actually figure out" is God.

>>17080518
you get to the big bang which happened for no particular reason.
so you exist for no particular reason. but really you exist to slave away so rich people can eat kids. basically
>but why
they're deranged
>but why
nature. they were abused or neglected and grew up with fucked up parents or friends
>but why
their parents fucked
>but why
mostly for pleasure
>but why
selection, that's how we keep going
>but why
laws of nature I guess
>but why
univese exists?
>but why
big bang. ah right. so basically no reason really

>>17080518
When part of the answer has more time than we have.

>>17080518
jesus christ why are you bumping a thread about the toddler “why? why? why?” phenomenon. This is literally a toddler thread. Sage.

Let me guess, the frog bumpers are at it again. I used to like you frog guys but this is becoming just obviously disruptive and in bad faith at this point

>>17080657
Do you live without purpose? How sad.