>Human only mathHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>erm humans doing high quality basic research to improve the lives of everyone is bad akshually
Just like the meta changed when nuclear bombs were invented, there's no going back to the pre-AI era. Too many papers and textbooks have AI integrated into them. You would have to set up a university with no internet access and no visitors to even attempt to go back.
>Human only mathYou mean like slide rulers and memorizing your multiplication tables??Those simple things took human beings from inventing the air plane to landing on the moon in less than 60 years. But the moon landing was over 60 years ago. What's happened since then? Since then humans have become more and more reliant on computers and now we've lost the ability to go to the moon all together and knowing how to do math is a thing worthy of being mocked for.The human race is in experiencing decompensation, and AI is only accelerating the regression.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decompensation
>>17080861TMD
>>17080892There is going back. And it's going to happen. Sorry not sorry.
>>17080895>What's happened since then?>five man-made objects are on the way out of the solar system>we've maintained a space station for almost thirty years>we landed two SUV-sized rovers on Mars>one of them successfully launched a helicopter drone>we photographed the face of Pluto>we orbited a probe around Saturn and it dispatched another probe to the surface of Titan>we discovered exoplanets around other stars, including the nearest, Proxima Centauri>etc etc etcJust because you're an ignoramus about modern space flight doesn't mean you have insight.
>>17080908>enter list of all lesser feats of no note you are coping hard over boomer propaganda.
>>17080861Mathcel xissies... our fake reputation that was never based on anything useful or even real... our modus vivendi... our way to scam the system and make a living out of hard-earned taxed money from honest citizens... our academic cliques where we can be together more communists than Lenin and Mao combined and talk about it during lunch while wearing ugly old dirty sweaters... our response?
>>17080947Your entire position is sour grapes, AIfag. Don't act like it isn't.
>>17080947>be responsible for inventing computers and AI>everything you're responsible for is fake
>>17080897come on, its funny, admit it
>>17080908> January 2006> November 1998> August 6, 2012> July 30, 2020> July 14, 2015> August 1999> April 1915 A majority of these discoveries are over a decade old and ultimately prove the point that humans are leaving earth less and less. If anyone is going to leave the planet. History proves it will be machines.>>17080895> slide rulers and memorizing your multiplication tablesMost of the hard work was done by machinists, which hid their work when building the shuttles to ensure that they could continue to get work if NASA decided to replace them. Eventually they did and reaped the consequences of throwing out the old guard. All of the specified documents were slightly off in ways the "new kids" wouldn't care about.>t. talked to retired aerospace engineers who built the Apollo series.
there should be no humans on the right side
>>17080895This. The mechanism is externalization which leads to deskilling. Decompensation is an outcome
>>17080971Ok I admit it, made me laugh
>GPT Sunburst, Repurpose this political cartoon about human-only math vs AI-assisted math to show the human-only math side as flourishing and successful while the AI-assisted math side is dystopic and sinister.
>>17082733>left side doesn't even change muchI guess they were happy to begin with.
>>17080892This presumes that AI is able to financially support itself indefinitely which is far from a given.
>>17080895>now we've lost the ability to go to the moonLiteral retard take. We've lost the will and therefore financial backing to go to the moon. There's no fucking reason to go to the moon other than to flex on the commies that we beat them to it.
>>17082780what about Helium isotopes?
>>17081021who says there are any?
interesting how gemini made all of the hippies doing organic math white while the people at ai university are multiracial.. wonder if it's trying to tell us something
>sickos>honest mathematicians
>>17080861no one is ever going to call it "super intelligence"
>>17083030Super fake intelligence
>>17083030Super intelligence was an actual term with actual meaning, synonym to ASI or AI vastly superior to human intelligence in every way, but orange nigger changed that name so now everyone who made AI predictions has to rename everything. It’s like if someone renamed protons into “isotopes” and physicists were just supposed to roll with it.
>>17083081Machine learning for specific applications was called AI. It's non-controversial while SI breaks out of the sandbox environments and into other systems. It's quite relevant to make a distinction.
>>17083092>SIMIGAtards are so nonwhite they're actually picking this xitter clownship up and running with it like it's serious business.>breaks out of the sandbox environments and into other systems. With a little help from Israeli cyber"security" companies. Either way, that's called malware and it's been around for decades.
>>17083109You are just word wrangling to express your illegal migrant status.AI is simpler models and application specific. SI (or whatever else that's Woke certified) is the potentially destructive. It's important to make a distinction to not give the general public a biased opinion of the whole field.
>>17083116MIGAtard spambot confirmed.
>>17083092>>17083116no retard that's not what either of those words mean. AI is an umbrella term that applies to any machine learning program. "artificial superintelligence" is a hypothetical AI that's smarter than the smartest humans can can understand concepts too complex for any human. "breaking out of sandboxes" or any other theater anthropic and openai are putting on is not the qualification for ASI, nor is anyone using that term other than the orange ape and his goons for propaganda purposes.
